For the purpose of this ranking, bibliometric data were meticulously gathered on January 12, 2026, ensuring the most current citation-based metrics were incorporated. The ranking methodology hinges on a researcher's D-index (Discipline H-index), which specifically accounts for publications and citations within the examined discipline. This focused measurement provides a nuanced and discipline-specific evaluation of scholarly impact, distinguishing it from general indices that encompass all research areas indiscriminately.
Scope of Research and Qualification Criteria
This ranking evaluates a total of 279,971 scientist profiles identified through a variety of bibliometric data sources across all scientific disciplines, with particular attention given to those specializing in Economics and Finance. From this extensive pool, 4,234 scientists were identified specifically in the Economics and Finance disciplines for detailed analysis.
To qualify for inclusion in the ranking, a scientist’s D-index must be at least 30, ensuring a high standard of scholarly achievement within the discipline. Furthermore, a majority of the researcher's tier publications must be concentrated in Economics and Finance, reinforcing the relevance of the ranking to this specific field. Additionally, significant awards and achievements in Economics and Finance were considered as important qualitative factors to complement the quantitative metrics.
The threshold for the D-index is dynamically set in increments of 10, calibrated according to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline. This method ensures that the top 1% of leading researchers in Economics and Finance are included in the ranking while maintaining rigorous standards. Moreover, to ascertain alignment between general scholarly influence and disciplinary specialization, the difference between a scientist’s general H-index and their D-index is maintained within a proximity of 30% or less.
Verification and Validation Practices
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data alone cannot fully capture the quality and impact of a researcher’s output, the team responsible for the ranking undertook additional verification steps. Each scientist’s profile was manually reviewed and cross-correlated against publications indexed in a wide array of trustworthy and authoritative sources to ensure accuracy and validity.
Though not directly influencing the rank order, the number of publications in prominent journals and conference proceedings was acknowledged as a valuable secondary indicator of a scholar’s substantive contribution to Economics and Finance. The ranking positions, however, are ultimately established through the D-index derived from data gathered primarily from OpenAlex and CrossRef — the two most renowned and reliable bibliometric databases currently available.
Interested readers and stakeholders are encouraged to explore detailed information concerning the ranking methodology on our methodology page, which comprehensively outlines the principles and procedures underpinning this initiative.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision Behind the Ranking
At Research.com, our mission in creating this ranking is to inspire and inform researchers, industry leaders, policymakers, and academic institutions worldwide. By shedding light on the leading experts in Economics and Finance across Poland, we provide a critical pathway for understanding scientific trends, identifying key contributors, and fostering collaboration within the global research community.
This ranking serves as a trusted resource for recognizing outstanding scholarly achievements, facilitating knowledge exchange, and supporting evidence-based decision-making in research funding and policy development. Our careful and rigorous approach reflects a commitment to advancing transparency and excellence in scientific evaluation.
