World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
23290
World Ranking
2039
National Ranking
1190

Mark W. Mahowald publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Mahowald sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 210 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark W. Mahowald D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Mahowald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1965 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Mark W. Mahowald was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their academic career included contributions to the scientific community recognized by an award from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, having been named a Fellow in 1965.

Although specific details regarding the main fields of study or subfields, as well as notable topics, are not available, Mahowald's scholarly activity was situated within a research environment at a major American university. This environment typically supports interdisciplinary engagement and collaboration, although no frequent co-authors, publication venues, or papers were documented in the available data.

The absence of recorded recent papers or book publications suggests a scarcity of accessible bibliographic metadata in public databases for Mahowald's work. Despite this, the recognition by the Sloan Foundation indicates involvement in research of significance at the time.

Mahowald's career and legacy exist within the historical framework of mid-20th century scientific contributions, as indicated by the 1965 fellowship award. The data reflects a professional trajectory tied to academic research and potential mentorship activities within their institution.

Best Publications

  • Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder in 38% of 29 older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder

    Carlos H. Schenck;Scott R. Bundlie;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Chronic behavioral disorders of human REM sleep: a new category of parasomnia.

    Carlos H. Schenck;Scott R. Bundlie;Milton G. Ettinger;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Relationship between hours of CPAP use and achieving normal levels of sleepiness and daily functioning.

    Terri E. Weaver;Greg Maislin;David F. Dinges;Thomas Bloxham

  • Pathophysiology of REM sleep behaviour disorder and relevance to neurodegenerative disease

    B. F. Boeve;M. H. Silber;C. B. Saper;T. J. Ferman

  • REM sleep behavior disorder: clinical, developmental, and neuroscience perspectives 16 years after its formal identification in SLEEP.

    Carlos H. Schenck;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Delayed emergence of a parkinsonian disorder or dementia in 81% of older men initially diagnosed with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a 16-year update on a previously reported series

    Carlos H. Schenck;Bradley F. Boeve;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Atlas, rules, and recording techniques for the scoring of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in human sleep.

    Mario Giovanni Terzano;Liborio Parrino;Adriano Sherieri;Ronald Chervin

  • Synucleinopathy pathology and REM sleep behavior disorder plus dementia or parkinsonism.

    B. F. Boeve;M. H. Silber;J. E. Parisi;D. W. Dickson;D. W. Dickson

  • Proposed diagnostic criteria for night eating syndrome.

    Kelly C. Allison;Jennifer D. Lundgren;John P. O'Reardon;Allan Geliebter

  • Postoperative respiratory compromise in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: can it be anticipated?

    G. M. Rosen;R. P. Muckle;M. W. Mahowald;G. S. Goding

  • REM sleep parasomnias.

    Mark W. Mahowald;Carlos H. Schenck

  • Clinicopathologic correlations in 172 cases of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder with or without a coexisting neurologic disorder.

    B. F. Boeve;M. H. Silber;T. J. Ferman;S. C. Lin

  • A Polysomnographic and Clinical Report on Sleep-Related Injury in 100 Adult Patients

    Carlos H. Schenck;Donna M. Milner;Thomas D. Hurwitz;Scott R. Bundlie

  • REM sleep behaviour disorder: An update on a series of 96 patients and a review of the world literature

    Carlos H. Schenck;Thomas D. Hurwitz;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Insights from studying human sleep disorders

    Mark W. Mahowald;Carlos H. Schenck

  • Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Treatable Parasomnia Affecting Older Adults

    Carlos H. Schenck;Scott R. Bundlie;Andrea L. Patterson;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Motor dyscontrol in narcolepsy : rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep without atonia and REM sleep behavior disorder

    Carlos H. Schenck;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Long-term, nightly benzodiazepine treatment of injurious parasomnias and other disorders of disrupted nocturnal sleep in 170 adults

    Carlos H. Schenck;Mark W. Mahowald;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Prominent eye movements during NREM sleep and REM sleep behavior disorder associated with fluoxetine treatment of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Carlos H. Schenck;Mark W. Mahowald;Suck Won Kim;Kevin A. O'Connor

  • A parasomnia overlap disorder involving sleepwalking, sleep terrors, and REM sleep behavior disorder in 33 polysomnographically confirmed cases.

    Carlos H. Schenck;Jeffrey L. Boyd;Mark W. Mahowald

  • Postoperative Respiratory Compromise in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Can It Be Anticipated?

    Gerald M. Rosen;Robert P. Muckle;Mark W. Mahowald;George S. Coding

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos H. Schenck
Carlos H. Schenck University of Minnesota
Arthur S. Walters
Arthur S. Walters Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Joseph E. Parisi
Joseph E. Parisi Mayo Clinic
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
Sudhansu Chokroverty
Sudhansu Chokroverty Seton Hall University
Liborio Parrino
Liborio Parrino University of Parma
Yves Dauvilliers
Yves Dauvilliers University of Montpellier
Isabelle Arnulf
Isabelle Arnulf Sorbonne University
Mario Giovanni Terzano
Mario Giovanni Terzano University of Parma

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many aspiring professionals choose online programs for their flexibility, allowing them to balance studies with work or family commitments. Key areas you can specialize in include counseling, clinical psychology, school psychology, and behavioral therapy.

If your goal is to become a licensed therapist, you should be familiar with state-specific education and licensure requirements. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Chula Vista has its own unique process, while the Cincinnati licensed therapist education requirements emphasize accredited graduate degrees and supervised clinical practice. Similarly, becoming a licensed therapist in Cleveland and meeting Colorado Springs licensed therapist requirements require a deep understanding of local regulations.

No matter where you plan to practice, researching your desired location’s licensure process is essential. Online psychology degrees often provide the academic foundation, but earning your license also demands supervised hours, passing exams, and fulfilling ongoing professional development.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Mahowald

Recently Published Articles