World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 53 5096 4683 23 23 466 10553

In Koo Hwang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by In Koo Hwang between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. In Koo Hwang published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 19.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2010. 11 of the 490 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2010. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 46 publications 2011: 46 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2001 2025

490 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
In Koo Hwang: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 10
2003 19
2004 22
2005 17
2006 25
2007 16
2008 34
2009 37
2010 46
2011 46
2012 16
2013 12
2014 25
2015 16
2016 25
2017 23
2018 24
2019 25
2020 16
2021 10
2022 5
2023 8
2024 6
2025 5
Total 490
Download as CSV

In Koo Hwang publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where In Koo Hwang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 458–467 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 466 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36 466
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

In Koo Hwang D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where In Koo Hwang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418 53
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

In Koo Hwang is affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea. Their research spans multiple intersecting domains within the biomedical sciences, with a significant emphasis on neuroscience, molecular biology, and biochemistry.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their work delves deeper into subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Key research topics addressed by In Koo Hwang involve:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Nerve Injury and Regeneration
  • Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

Frequent coauthors collaborating with In Koo Hwang include:

  • Dae Won Kim
  • Woosuk Kim
  • Hyo Young Jung
  • Kyu Ri Hahn
  • Yeo Sung Yoon

The researcher has published extensively in several scientific journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Neurochemical Research
  • Cells
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Neurochemistry International

Notable recent papers by In Koo Hwang include:

  • Could Defatted Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) and Mealworm Oil Be Used as Food Ingredients? (2020, Foods)
  • Determination of Carbohydrate Composition in Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) Larvae and Characterization of Mealworm Chitin and Chitosan (2021, Foods)
  • Effects of Pyridoxine Deficiency on Hippocampal Function and Its Possible Association with V-Type Proton ATPase Subunit B2 and Heat Shock Cognate Protein 70 (2020, Cells)
  • High glucose-mediated PICALM and mTORC1 modulate processing of amyloid precursor protein via endosomal abnormalities (2020, British Journal of Pharmacology)
  • Pyridoxine Deficiency Exacerbates Neuronal Damage after Ischemia by Increasing Oxidative Stress and Reduces Proliferating Cells and Neuroblasts in the Gerbil Hippocampus (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

Best Publications

  • TNF-Related Activation-Induced Cytokine Enhances Leukocyte Adhesiveness: Induction of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 via TNF Receptor-Associated Factor and Protein Kinase C-Dependent NF-κB Activation in Endothelial Cells

    Jeong Ki Min;Young Myeong Kim;Sung Wan Kim;Min Chul Kwon

  • Indole‐3‐propionic acid attenuates neuronal damage and oxidative stress in the ischemic hippocampus

    In Koo Hwang;Ki Yeon Yoo;Hua Li;Ok Kyu Park

  • Ischemia-induced changes in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and neuroprotective effect of its agonist, exendin-4, in experimental transient cerebral ischemia.

    Choong Hyun Lee;Bingchun Yan;Ki Yeon Yoo;Jung Hoon Choi

  • Melatonin improves D-galactose-induced aging effects on behavior, neurogenesis, and lipid peroxidation in the mouse dentate gyrus via increasing pCREB expression.

    Dae Young Yoo;Woosuk Kim;Choong Hyun Lee;Bin Na Shin

  • In vivo protein transduction: biologically active intact pep-1-superoxide dismutase fusion protein efficiently protects against ischemic insult.

    Won Sik Eum;Dae Won Kim;In Koo Hwang;Ki-Yeon Yoo

  • Vanillin, 4-hydroxybenzyl aldehyde and 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol prevent hippocampal CA1 cell death following global ischemia

    Hyeon Ju Kim;In Koo Hwang;Moo Ho Won

  • Effects of curcumin (Curcuma longa) on learning and spatial memory as well as cell proliferation and neuroblast differentiation in adult and aged mice by upregulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor and CREB signaling.

    Sung Min Nam;Jung Hoon Choi;Dae Young Yoo;Woosuk Kim

  • Pre- and post-treatments with escitalopram protect against experimental ischemic neuronal damage via regulation of BDNF expression and oxidative stress.

    Choong Hyun Lee;Joon Ha Park;Ki Yeon Yoo;Jung Hoon Choi

  • Gastrodin decreases immunoreactivities of gamma-aminobutyric acid shunt enzymes in the hippocampus of seizure-sensitive gerbils.

    Sung-Jin An;Seung-Kook Park;In Koo Hwang;Soo Young Choi

  • Systemic administration of lipopolysaccharide induces cyclooxygenase-2 immunoreactivity in endothelium and increases microglia in the mouse hippocampus.

    Dae Won Chung;Ki-Yeon Yoo;In Koo Hwang;Dae Won Kim

  • Berberry extract reduces neuronal damage and N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor 1 immunoreactivity in the gerbil hippocampus after transient forebrain ischemia.

    Ki-Yeon Yoo;In Koo Hwang;Beong Ou Lim;Tae-Cheon Kang

  • Neuroprotective effects of grape seed extract on neuronal injury by inhibiting DNA damage in the gerbil hippocampus after transient forebrain ischemia

    In Koo Hwang;Ki-Yeon Yoo;Duk Soo Kim;Youn-Kab Jeong

  • Soy Isoflavones Improve Spatial Delayed Matching-to-Place Performance and Reduce Cholinergic Neuron Loss in Elderly Male Rats

    Yoon-Bok Lee;Hyong Joo Lee;Moo Ho Won;In Koo Hwang

  • Anti-inflammatory Effect of Tanshinone I in Neuroprotection Against Cerebral Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury in the Gerbil Hippocampus

    Joon Ha Park;Ok kyu Park;Jeong-Hwi Cho;Bai Hui Chen

  • Ionized Calcium-binding Adapter Molecule 1 Immunoreactive Cells Change in the Gerbil Hippocampal CA1 Region after Ischemia/Reperfusion

    In Koo Hwang;Ki-Yeon Yoo;Dae Won Kim;Soo Young Choi

  • Copper chaperone for Cu,Zn-SOD supplement potentiates the Cu,Zn-SOD function of neuroprotective effects against ischemic neuronal damage in the gerbil hippocampus

    In Koo Hwang;Won Sik Eum;Ki-Yeon Yoo;Jun Hwi Cho

  • Changes in the expression of mitochondrial peroxiredoxin and thioredoxin in neurons and glia and their protective effects in experimental cerebral ischemic damage.

    In Koo Hwang;Ki Yeon Yoo;Dae Won Kim;Choong Hyun Lee

  • Activation of microglia and induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus of type 2 diabetic rats.

    In Koo Hwang;Jung Hoon Choi;Sung Min Nam;Ok Kyu Park

  • Expression and changes of endogenous insulin-like growth factor-1 in neurons and glia in the gerbil hippocampus and dentate gyrus after ischemic insult.

    In Koo Hwang;Ki Yeon Yoo;Seung Kook Park;Sung Jin An

  • Strain-specific differences in cell proliferation and differentiation in the dentate gyrus of C57BL/6N and C3H/HeN mice fed a high fat diet.

    In Koo Hwang;Il Yong Kim;Dae Won Kim;Ki-Yeon Yoo

Frequent Co-Authors

Moo-Ho Won
Moo-Ho Won Kangwon National University
Je Kyung Seong
Je Kyung Seong Seoul National University
Soo Young Choi
Soo Young Choi Hallym University
Young-Myeong Kim
Young-Myeong Kim Kangwon National University
Young-Guen Kwon
Young-Guen Kwon Yonsei University
Tae-Cheon Kang
Tae-Cheon Kang Hallym University
Ho Jae Han
Ho Jae Han Seoul National University
SangGuan You
SangGuan You Gangneung–Wonju National University
Jung Ah Lim
Jung Ah Lim Korea Institute of Science and Technology
Stephen Safe
Stephen Safe Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of career options, especially with the growing availability of online programs. Students interested in maximizing their earning potential should consider how Neuroscience compares to other college majors that make the most money. While research and healthcare roles often require advanced degrees, emerging fields like neuroinformatics and biotechnology offer lucrative pathways as well.

Affordability is also a key concern for prospective students. Fortunately, there are many cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa in usa, making it possible to pursue a Neuroscience-related degree while minimizing student debt.

For those looking to bolster their resumes or switch into the field, consider earning certifications online in areas such as data analysis, medical coding, or laboratory technology. These certifications can enhance job prospects and often lead to well-paying positions.

Additionally, some students may prefer programs that are less intensive. There are several easy university options online, making it simpler to get started in allied health or support roles within Neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing In Koo Hwang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles