World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frank J. Snoek

Frank J. Snoek

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
25077
World Ranking
14663
National Ranking
560

Frank J. Snoek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Snoek sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank J. Snoek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Snoek sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank J. Snoek is affiliated with Amsterdam UMC in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Additional subfields include Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Genetics.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics related to diabetes and associated health conditions. These topics include:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetes Management and Education
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Diabetes and Associated Disorders
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Pancreatic Function and Diabetes

Frank J. Snoek has coauthored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators. These include:

  • Maartje de Wit
  • Gernot Desoyé
  • David Simmons
  • Jürgen Harreiter
  • Rosa Corcoy

The primary venues where this researcher's work has been published include:

  • Diabetic Medicine
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare
  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Therapy

Selected recent publications demonstrate the range of research topics addressed. These include:

  • The Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), 2021, Diabetes Care
  • The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), 2021, Diabetologia
  • Efficacy and Moderators of Internet-Based Interventions in Adults with Subthreshold Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • The statistical approach in trial-based economic evaluations matters: get your statistics together!, 2021, BMC Health Services Research
  • Metabolic phenotypes of early gestational diabetes mellitus and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes, 2020, Diabetic Medicine

Best Publications

  • Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis

    M J Knol;Jos W R Twisk;Jos W R Twisk;Aartjan T F Beekman;R. J. Heine

  • Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study

    Mark Peyrot;R. R. Rubin;T. Lauritzen;F. J. Snoek

  • The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

    Richard I. G. Holt;Richard I. G. Holt;J. Hans DeVries;Amy Hess-Fischl;Irl B. Hirsch

  • Resistance to Insulin Therapy Among Patients and Providers Results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study

    Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot;Richard R. Rubin;Torsten Lauritzen;Soren E. Skovlund

  • Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale.

    F J Snoek;F Pouwer;G W Welch;W H Polonsky

  • The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Nikki Perrin;M J Davies;N Robertson;F J Snoek

  • Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1.

    B.E. McGuire;T.G. Morrison;N. Hermanns;S. Skovlund

  • Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial

    Cornelis A J van Beers;J Hans DeVries;Susanne J Kleijer;Mark M Smits

  • Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

    Maartie de Wit;Frans Pouwer;Reinoud J B J Gemke;Henriette A Delemarre-van de Waal

  • Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis;Jasper Nuyen;Corinne Stoop;Juliana Chan

  • Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations.

    Sudesna Chatterjee;Melanie J Davies;Simon Heller;Jane Speight

  • Symptoms and Well-Being in Relation to Glycemic Control in Type II Diabetes

    Ferdinand E.E. Van Der Does;J. Nico D. De Neeling;Frank J. Snoek;Pieter J. Kostense

  • Cognitive functions and quality of life in patients with low-grade gliomas: the impact of radiotherapy.

    M. J. B. Taphoorn;A. K. Schiphorst;F. J. Snoek;J. Lindeboom

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Rates and risks for co-morbid depression in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from a community-based study

    F Pouwer;Aartjan T F Beekman;G Nijpels;J M Dekker

  • Web-Based Depression Treatment for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Patients A randomized, controlled trial

    Kim M.P. van Bastelaar;François Pouwer;Pim Cuijpers;Heleen Riper

  • A randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and intensive injection therapy in type 1 diabetes for patients with long-standing poor glycemic control.

    J. Hans DeVries;Frank J. Snoek;Piet J. Kostense;Nathalie Masurel

  • Diabetic encephalopathy: a concept in need of a definition

    G. S. Mijnhout;P. Scheltens;M. Diamant;G. J. Biessels

  • The Confidence in Diabetes Self-Care Scale: Psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and U.S. patients with type 1 diabetes

    Nicole C W Van Der Ven;Katie Weinger;Katie Weinger;Joyce Yi;Frans Pouwer

  • Development of a Type 2 Diabetes Symptom Checklist: a Measure of Symptom Severity

    P.A. Grootenhuis;F.J. Snoek;R.J. Heine;L.M. Bouter

Frequent Co-Authors

David Simmons
David Simmons Western Sydney University
Peter Damm
Peter Damm University of Copenhagen
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eus J.W. Van Someren
Eus J.W. Van Someren Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Stefano Del Prato
Stefano Del Prato University of Pisa
Femke Lamers
Femke Lamers Amsterdam UMC
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a range of online degree options and professional advancement pathways. Many registered nurses looking to become nurse practitioners can benefit from rn to np programs, which offer flexible coursework tailored for working professionals. Another popular route is pursuing online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, ideal for those seeking to earn a bachelor’s degree while managing other commitments.

For those interested in wellness and preventive care, online degrees in nutrition provide a solid foundation for roles in dietetics, health coaching, and public health. Healthcare administration is another growing field—students can advance their leadership skills and qualify for managerial roles by enrolling in online mha programs that are fully accredited.

Each of these pathways brings unique advantages, whether you hope to provide direct patient care, manage medical facilities, or promote healthy living through nutrition. Online programs offer the flexibility and accessibility needed to balance education with professional and personal responsibilities, making it easier to move forward in your healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Frank J. Snoek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles