World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5807 5395 3148 2854 173 15705

Diana Deutsch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana Deutsch between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana Deutsch published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 2 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 9 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 9 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 16 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1962 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana Deutsch: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 1
1970 2
1971 0
1972 3
1973 2
1974 4
1975 6
1976 4
1977 2
1978 9
1979 4
1980 6
1981 3
1982 7
1983 10
1984 5
1985 2
1986 7
1987 3
1988 4
1989 1
1990 3
1991 3
1992 3
1993 1
1994 3
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 6
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 6
2009 4
2010 7
2011 6
2012 1
2013 9
2014 2
2015 0
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 16
2020 1
2021 2
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

Diana Deutsch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Deutsch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 173 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 173
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana Deutsch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Deutsch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Diana Deutsch is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains primarily within neuroscience and mathematics, focusing particularly on cognitive neuroscience and statistics and probability.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions

Deutsch's scholarly output includes work published in peer-reviewed journals and contributions to book publications. Among recent papers, a notable publication is "Absolute pitch is disrupted by a memory illusion," released in 2021 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Research has also been disseminated in this venue:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Co-authorship has been an important aspect of their scientific contributions, with frequent collaborators including Howard Burton, Howard A. Burton, Miren Edelstein, Kevin Dooley, and Trevor Henthorn.

Deutsch has also authored at least one book published by Open Agenda Publishing eBooks titled Believing Your Ears: Examining Auditory Illusions, published in 2020.

The scientist's work has been recognized by professional organizations. They have been named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1992 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1986.

Best Publications

  • Attention: Some theoretical considerations.

    J. A. Deutsch;D. Deutsch

  • The psychology of music

    Diana Deutsch

  • Psychology and Music

    Diana Deutsch

  • The Internal Representation of Pitch Sequences in Tonal Music

    Diana Deutsch;John Feroe

  • Tones and numbers: specificity of interference in immediate memory.

    Diana Deutsch

  • 9 – The Processing of Pitch Combinations

    Diana Deutsch

  • Absolute pitch among American and Chinese conservatory students: prevalence differences, and evidence for a speech-related critical period.

    Diana Deutsch;Trevor Henthorn;Elizabeth Marvin;HongShuai Xu

  • The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences

    Diana Deutsch

  • Absolute Pitch, Speech, and Tone Language: Some Experiments and a Proposed Framework

    Diana Deutsch;Trevor Henthorn;Mark Dolson

  • Grouping Mechanisms in Music

    Diana Deutsch

  • Illusory transformation from speech to song.

    Diana Deutsch;Trevor Henthorn;Rachael Lapidis

  • An auditory illusion

    Diana Deutsch

  • Octave generalization and tune recognition.

    Diana Deutsch

  • THE PROCESSING OF PITCH COMBINATIONS

    Diana Deutsch

  • The generation of two isochronous sequences in parallel

    Diana Deutsch

  • Absolute pitch among students in an American music conservatory: Association with tone language fluency

    Diana Deutsch;Kevin Dooley;Trevor Henthorn;Brian Head

  • The Tritone Paradox: An Influence of Language on Music Perception

    Diana Deutsch

  • Paradoxes of musical pitch.

    Diana Deutsch

  • Speech versus Song: Multiple Pitch-Sensitive Areas Revealed by a Naturally Occurring Musical Illusion

    Adam Tierney;Frederic Dick;D. Deutsch;Martin I. Sereno

  • A Musical Paradox

    Diana Deutsch

  • Separate "what" and "where" decision mechanisms in processing a dichotic tonal sequence.

    Diana Deutsch;Philip L. Roll

Frequent Co-Authors

William S.-Y. Wang
William S.-Y. Wang Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Keith Rayner
Keith Rayner University of California, San Diego
Leon Y. Deouell
Leon Y. Deouell Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Timothy D. Griffiths
Timothy D. Griffiths University College London
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Martin I. Sereno
Martin I. Sereno San Diego State University
Nachum Soroker
Nachum Soroker Tel Aviv University
Frederic Dick
Frederic Dick Birkbeck, University of London
Peter Howell
Peter Howell University College London
Lauren Stewart
Lauren Stewart Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA unlocks a range of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students choose to specialize in counseling, where there is a growing demand for professionals skilled in mental health and substance abuse treatment.

One promising career path is becoming a substance abuse counselor in Phoenix, which requires relevant degrees, state licensure, and specific field experience. The process may vary depending on location; for instance, how to become a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh includes unique state requirements and training.

There are also valuable insights on becoming a substance abuse counselor in Plano or exploring how to become a substance abuse counselor in Port St. Lucie. Each city and state may have different certification processes and job opportunities, but all emphasize the importance of accredited education and supervised clinical hours.

Whether you’re pursuing an online psychology degree or aiming for a counseling specialization, it’s essential to research local requirements and tailor your studies to meet your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Diana Deutsch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles