World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
47
Citations
8140
World Ranking
18704
National Ranking
1279

Sascha Al Dahouk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sascha Al Dahouk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 122 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Sascha Al Dahouk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sascha Al Dahouk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sascha Al Dahouk is affiliated with the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment in Germany. Their research spans multiple areas within the life sciences, particularly focusing on microbiology, infectious diseases, and food safety.

The primary fields of study addressed by Al Dahouk include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Medicine. Their work is further specialized in subfields such as Food Science, Small Animals, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, and Infectious Diseases.

Research topics frequently explored in their publications cover:

  • Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Burkholderia infections and melioidosis
  • Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Al Dahouk's recent publications include:

  • Large Nationwide Outbreak of Invasive Listeriosis Associated with Blood Sausage, Germany, 2018-2019 (2020), Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • If You're Not Confused, You're Not Paying Attention: Ochrobactrum Is Not Brucella (2023), Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • Nationwide outbreak of invasive listeriosis associated with consumption of meat products in health care facilities, Germany, 2014-2019 (2020), Clinical Microbiology and Infection
  • Backtracking and forward checking of human listeriosis clusters identified a multiclonal outbreak linked to Listeria monocytogenes in meat products of a single producer (2020), Emerging Microbes & Infections
  • Invasive listeriosis outbreaks and salmon products: a genomic, epidemiological study (2022), Emerging Microbes & Infections

Frequent coauthors in Al Dahouk's research include:

  • Ralf Dieckmann (13 collaborations)
  • Sylvia Kleta (9 collaborations)
  • Stefanie Lüth (8 collaborations)
  • Hendrik Wilking (6 collaborations)
  • Sven Halbedel (5 collaborations)

The scientist publishes predominantly in journals such as Microorganisms, Scientific Reports, Emerging Microbes & Infections, Microbial Genomics, and Microbiology Spectrum.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation and selection of tandem repeat loci for a Brucella MLVA typing assay

    Philippe Le Flèche;Isabelle Jacques;Maggy Grayon;Sascha Al Dahouk

  • Brucella microti sp. nov., isolated from the common vole Microtus arvalis.

    Holger C. Scholz;Zdenek Hubalek;Ivo Sedláček;Gilles Vergnaud

  • Brucella inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection.

    Holger C. Scholz;Karsten Nöckler;Cornelia Göllner;Peter Bahn

  • Evaluation of Brucella MLVA typing for human brucellosis

    Sascha Al Dahouk;Philippe Le Flèche;Karsten Nöckler;Isabelle Jacques;Isabelle Jacques

  • Brucellosis - regionally emerging zoonotic disease?

    Mayada Gwida;Sascha Al Dahouk;Falk Melzer;Uwe Rösler

  • A "One Health" surveillance and control of brucellosis in developing countries: moving away from improvisation.

    Jacques Godfroid;Sascha Al Dahouk;Sascha Al Dahouk;Georgios Pappas;Felix Roth

  • Brucella papionis sp. nov., isolated from baboons (Papio spp.).

    Adrian M. Whatmore;Nicholas Davison;Axel Cloeckaert;Axel Cloeckaert;Sascha Al Dahouk

  • A medical-toxicological view of tattooing

    Peter Laux;Tewes Tralau;Jutta Tentschert;Annegret Blume

  • Brucella vulpis sp. nov., isolated from mandibular lymph nodes of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes)

    Holger C. Scholz;Sandra Revilla-Fernández;Sascha Al Dahouk;Jens A. Hammerl

  • Implications of Laboratory Diagnosis on Brucellosis Therapy

    Sascha Al Dahouk;Karsten Nöckler

  • Isolation of Brucella microti from soil.

    Holger C. Scholz;Zdenek Hubalek;Jirina Nesvadbova;Herbert Tomaso

  • MLVA-16 typing of 295 marine mammal Brucella isolates from different animal and geographic origins identifies 7 major groups within Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis

    Marianne Maquart;Philippe Le Flèche;Geoffrey Foster;Morten Tryland

  • Isolation of Brucella microti from mandibular lymph nodes of red foxes, Vulpes vulpes, in lower Austria.

    Holger Christian Scholz;Erwin Hofer;Gilles Vergnaud;Philippe Le Fleche

  • Changing epidemiology of human brucellosis, Germany, 1962-2005

    Sascha Al Dahouk;Heinrich Neubauer;Andreas Hensel;Irene Schöneberg

  • Overview of validated alternative methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens

    Alexander Rohde;Alexander Rohde;Jens Andre Hammerl;Idesbald Boone;Wiebke Jansen;Wiebke Jansen

  • FISHing for bacteria in food--a promising tool for the reliable detection of pathogenic bacteria?

    Alexander Rohde;Jens Andre Hammerl;Bernd Appel;Ralf Dieckmann

  • Whole genome sequencing as a typing tool for foodborne pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes – The way towards global harmonisation and data exchange

    Stefanie Lüth;Sylvia Kleta;Sascha Al Dahouk;Sascha Al Dahouk

  • Rapid detection of Yersinia pestis with multiplex real-time PCR assays using fluorescent hybridisation probes

    Herbert Tomaso;Emil C Reisinger;Sascha Al Dahouk;Dimitrios Frangoulidis

  • Antibiotic susceptibility of 259 Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from food, food-processing plants and human samples in Germany.

    Matthias Noll;Matthias Noll;Sylvia Kleta;Sascha Al Dahouk;Sascha Al Dahouk

  • Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of bacteria belonging to the Ochrobactrum–Brucella group by recA and 16S rRNA gene-based comparative sequence analysis

    Holger C. Scholz;Sascha Al Dahouk;Herbert Tomaso;Heinrich Neubauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert Tomaso
Herbert Tomaso Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
Heinrich Neubauer
Heinrich Neubauer Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
Holger C. Scholz
Holger C. Scholz Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology
Karsten Nöckler
Karsten Nöckler Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Gilles Vergnaud
Gilles Vergnaud University of Paris-Saclay
Jens A. Hammerl
Jens A. Hammerl Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Axel Cloeckaert
Axel Cloeckaert INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Martin Pfeffer
Martin Pfeffer Leipzig University
Adrian M. Whatmore
Adrian M. Whatmore Animal and Plant Health Agency
Jacques Godfroid
Jacques Godfroid University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and fast-growing healthcare careers. One attractive pathway is pursuing an online healthcare MBA, which equips graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, biotech firms, or public health organizations.

Many students are also interested in medical billing and coding. Certifications play a key role in this sector. To choose the best fit, explore the differences in ccs certification in terms of requirements, costs, and career prospects.

When considering income, it’s helpful to know how much do medical coders make across different states and specializations. Earnings can be competitive, especially for those with advanced skills and certifications.

Finally, some students wonder is medical coding a dying career. Recent trends show a steady demand for qualified coders due to ongoing healthcare industry growth and evolving regulatory requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Sascha Al Dahouk

Trending Scientists