World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6190 5752 627 595 264 8501

Peter Howell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Howell between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Howell published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 17 of the 322 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 13 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
1975 2025

322 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Howell: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 0
1977 1
1978 2
1979 0
1980 5
1981 2
1982 0
1983 13
1984 4
1985 5
1986 4
1987 9
1988 4
1989 2
1990 6
1991 14
1992 5
1993 3
1994 1
1995 5
1996 0
1997 6
1998 4
1999 5
2000 9
2001 5
2002 8
2003 5
2004 15
2005 10
2006 5
2007 8
2008 10
2009 5
2010 9
2011 19
2012 6
2013 16
2014 8
2015 6
2016 8
2017 10
2018 9
2019 10
2020 7
2021 9
2022 3
2023 3
2024 11
2025 6
Total 322
Download as CSV

Peter Howell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Howell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 264 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 264
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Howell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Howell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Howell is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology and neuroscience, with notable contributions to subfields such as clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and artificial intelligence.

Their work addresses a range of topics including stuttering research and treatment, phonetics and phonology research, the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, hearing loss and rehabilitation, language development and disorders, speech recognition and synthesis, and noise effects and management.

Recent scientific papers authored or coauthored by Peter Howell include:

  • Systematic Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Detecting Developmental Stuttering, 2022, published in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
  • The Possible Role of Early-Stage Phase-Locked Neural Activities in Speech-in-Noise Perception in Human Adults across Age and Hearing Loss, 2022, published in Hearing Research
  • Causal Relationship between the Right Auditory Cortex and Speech-Evoked Envelope-Following Response: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Stimulation and Electroencephalography, 2021, published in Cerebral Cortex
  • Neuroplasticity of Speech-in-Noise Processing in Older Adults Assessed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), 2024, published in Brain Topography
  • Voice Onset Time and Formant Onset Frequencies in Arabic Stuttered Speech, 2020, published in Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

Peter Howell's collaborations involve frequent co-authors including Kevin Tang, Liam Barrett, Guangting Mai, Feda Al-Tamimi, and Roaa Alsulaiman.

Their publications appear across several key academic venues with multiple contributions, including:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • Hiroshima University Academic Information Repository (Hiroshima University)

Their academic contributions also include book publications, such as a work titled "Xenophon" released in 2020 under Bloomsbury Academic eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering

    Kate E. Watkins;Stephen M. Smith;Steve Davis;Peter Howell

  • Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates

    Stephen Davis;Peter Howell;Frances Cooke

  • Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis.

    Maggie Snowling;Nata Goulandris;Maria Bowlby;Peter Howell

  • Assessment of Some Contemporary Theories of Stuttering That Apply to Spontaneous Speech.

    Peter Howell

  • Genetic etiology in cases of recovered and persistent stuttering in an unselected, longitudinal sample of young twins

    Katharina Dworzynski;Anna Remington;Frühling Rijsdijk;Peter Howell

  • Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age.

    Peter Howell;James Au-Yeung;Stevie Sackin

  • The EXPLAN theory of fluency control applied to the diagnosis of stuttering

    Peter Howell;James Au-Yeung

  • Comparison of prosodic properties between read and spontaneous speech material

    Peter Howell;Karima Kadi-Hanifi

  • Musical structure and cognition

    Peter Howell;Ian Cross;Robert West

  • Phonological Words and Stuttering on Function Words

    James Au-Yeung;Peter Howell;Lesley Pilgrim

  • Disrupted white matter in language and motor tracts in developmental stuttering

    Emily L. Connally;David Ward;Peter Howell;Kate E. Watkins

  • Factors Affecting Fluency in Stutterers when Speaking under Altered Auditory Feedback

    Peter Howell;Nirit El-Yaniv;David J. Powell

  • Anxiety in speakers who persist and recover from stuttering

    Stephen Davis;Daniella Shisca;Peter Howell

  • The effects of bilingualism on stuttering during late childhood

    Peter Howell;Stephen Roger Davis;Roberta Williams

  • Production and perception of rise time in the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction

    Peter Howell;Stuart Rosen

  • INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF CONTENT WORDS LEADING TO LIFESPAN DIFFERENCES IN PHONOLOGICAL DIFFICULTY IN STUTTERING.

    Peter Howell;James Au-Yeung;Stevie Sackin

  • Syntactic analysis of the spontaneous speech of normally fluent and stuttering children

    Karima Kadi-Hanifi;Peter Howell

  • The University College London Archive of Stuttered Speech (UCLASS)

    Peter Howell;Stephen Davis;Jon Bartrip

  • Signs of developmental stuttering up to age eight and at 12 plus

    Peter Howell

  • Susceptibility to the effects of delayed auditory feedback.

    Peter Howell;Alexandra Archer

  • Development of A Two-Stage Procedure for the Automatic Recognition of Dysfluencies in the Speech of Children Who Stutter: I. Psychometric Procedures Appropriate for Selection of Training Material for Lexical Dysfluency Classifiers

    Peter Howell;Stevie Sackin;Kazan Glenn

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert West
Robert West University College London
Kate E. Watkins
Kate E. Watkins University of Oxford
Roland von Känel
Roland von Känel University of Zurich
Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross
Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross University of Zurich
Martin Preisig
Martin Preisig University of Lausanne
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich
Phil Reed
Phil Reed Swansea University
Fruhling Rijsdijk
Fruhling Rijsdijk King's College London
J. Scott Yaruss
J. Scott Yaruss Michigan State University
Chuansheng Chen
Chuansheng Chen University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in Psychology, there are several related online degrees and career pathways you might explore. Popular options include social work, counseling, and mental health services. Each field has its own specific educational and licensure requirements, which often vary by state.

For those interested in social work, understanding the social worker degree requirements in Wyoming is a good starting point, as requirements can differ across regions. Similarly, aspiring counselors must be aware of state-specific rules. For example, the Alabama licensed professional counselor requirements, lpc licensure requirements in Alaska, and lpc license requirements in Arizona all provide detailed information for students considering these paths.

Many accredited universities offer online Psychology and counseling programs that align with state licensure standards, allowing you to study flexibly while preparing for a rewarding career. Researching requirements early helps ensure you stay on the right track for your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Howell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles