World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5082
World Ranking
10198
National Ranking
1002

Martin Corley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Corley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin Corley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Corley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Corley is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom and works primarily in the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their research contributions span areas such as Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's main research topics involve:

  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Hate speech and cyberbullying detection
  • Language, metaphor, and cognition
  • Neurobiology of language and bilingualism
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Mental health research topics
  • Behavioral health and interventions

Martin Corley has contributed to several publication venues, notably:

  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Discourse Processes
  • Methods in Psychology

Recent scholarly articles authored or co-authored include:

  • Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability (2020), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Crosby, Monin, and Richardson (2008) (2020), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Veritable Untruths: Autistic Traits and the Processing of Deception (2021), published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Discourse Markers Activate Their, Like, Cohort Competitors (2021), published in Discourse Processes

Frequent collaborators in research include:

  • Josiah King
  • Jia E. Loy
  • Hannah Rohde
  • Hugh Rabagliati
  • Benjamin Dering

Best Publications

  • Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records

    Don C. Mitchell;Fernando Cuetos;Martin M. B. Corley;Marc Brysbaert

  • Hesitation Disfluencies in Spontaneous Speech: The Meaning of um

    Martin Corley;Oliver W. Stewart

  • It's the way that you, er, say it: hesitations in speech affect language comprehension.

    Martin Corley;Lucy J. MacGregor;David I. Donaldson

  • Parsing in Different Languages

    Fernando Cuetos;Don C Mitchell;Martin M B Corley;Manuel Carreiras

  • Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study

    Martin Corley;Christoph Scheepers

  • Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials

    Aine Ito;Martin Corley;Martin J. Pickering;Andrea E. Martin

  • Timing accuracy of Web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package

    Frank Keller;Subahshini Gunasekharan;Neil Mayo;Martin Corley

  • Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism.

    Don C. Mitchell;Martin M. B. Corley;Alan Garnham

  • Investigating the time-course of phonological prediction in native and non-native speakers of English: A visual world eye-tracking study

    Aine Ito;Aine Ito;Martin J. Pickering;Martin Corley

  • Error Biases in Inner and Overt Speech: Evidence From Tongue Twisters

    Martin Corley;Paul H. Brocklehurst;H. Susannah Moat

  • A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension

    Aine Ito;Martin Corley;Martin J. Pickering

  • The role of inhibition in the production of disfluencies.

    Paul E. Engelhardt;Martin Corley;Joel T. Nigg;Fernanda Ferreira

  • Cascading influences on the production of speech: Evidence from articulation

    Corey T. McMillan;Martin Corley

  • The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn’t fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975) ☆

    Robert J. Hartsuiker;Martin Corley;Heike Martensen

  • Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    C Scheepers;Martin Corley

  • Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability

    Charles R. Ebersole;Maya B. Mathur;Erica Baranski;Diane-Jo Bart-Plange

  • Exploring the Relationship Between Gestural Recognition and Imitation: Evidence of Dyspraxia in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Heidi Stieglitz Ham;Angela Bartolo;Martin Corley;Gnanathusharan Rajendran

  • Listening to the sound of silence: disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners.

    Lucy J. MacGregor;Martin Corley;David I. Donaldson

  • Why um helps auditory word recognition: the temporal delay hypothesis.

    Martin Corley;Robert J. Hartsuiker

  • Articulatory evidence for feedback and competition in speech production

    Corey T. McMillan;Martin Corley;Robin J. Lickley

  • Attention orienting effects of hesitations in speech: evidence from ERPs.

    Philip Collard;Martin Corley;Lucy J. MacGregor;David I. Donaldson

  • Investigating the inner speech of people who stutter: evidence for (and against) the covert repair hypothesis.

    Paul H. Brocklehurst;Martin Corley

  • Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

    Martin Corley;R J Hartsuiker

  • Phonological Encoding and Monitoring in Normal and Pathological Speech

    Melanie Russell;Martin Corley;Robin Lickley

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Hartsuiker
Robert J. Hartsuiker Ghent University
Martin J. Pickering
Martin J. Pickering University of Edinburgh
David I. Donaldson
David I. Donaldson University of Stirling
Michael Ramscar
Michael Ramscar University of Tübingen
Frank Keller
Frank Keller University of Edinburgh
Tracy Packiam Alloway
Tracy Packiam Alloway University of North Florida
Marc Brysbaert
Marc Brysbaert Ghent University
Corey T. McMillan
Corey T. McMillan University of Pennsylvania
Mante S. Nieuwland
Mante S. Nieuwland Max Planck Society
Wendy Johnson
Wendy Johnson University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. One of the most popular fields is marriage and family therapy (MFT), which requires a specialized education and credentialing process that varies by location.

For individuals interested in this career, knowing the St. Louis mft education requirements can help you plan your academic path. Each state and city can have specific guidelines. For example, if you want to explore how to become an MFT in St. Petersburg, how to become an mft in St. Petersburg offers a step-by-step guide.

Students considering careers outside these areas can research how to how to become an mft in Stockton or review the Tampa mft education requirements for localized insights. Understanding these requirements can help you select the best online or in-person degree to fit your career goals, whether as a counselor, therapist, or other psychology professional.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Corley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles