World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
7133
World Ranking
8797
National Ranking
3147

Richard C. Quinn publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Quinn sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard C. Quinn D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Quinn sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard C. Quinn is affiliated with Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research portfolio spans across several fields, primarily focusing on physics and astronomy as well as engineering. Within these areas, their work is further categorized into subfields including astronomy and astrophysics, biomedical engineering, physiology, aerospace engineering, and ecology.

Their main topics of investigation include:

  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Space Exploration and Technology
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Quinn has published extensively in a range of scientific venues. Frequent platforms for their research dissemination include:

  • Astrobiology
  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • npj Microgravity
  • Frontiers in Space Technologies

Among recent publications, notable works consist of:

  • "Mars Extant Life: What's Next? Conference Report" (2020), published in Astrobiology
  • "Future space experiment platforms for astrobiology and astrochemistry research" (2023), published in npj Microgravity
  • "Community Report from the Biosignatures Standards of Evidence Workshop" (2022), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Europan Molecular Indicators of Life Investigation (EMILI) for a Future Europa Lander Mission" (2022), published in Frontiers in Space Technologies
  • "The Atacama Rover Astrobiology Drilling Studies (ARADS) Project" (2023), published in Astrobiology

The collaboration network of Richard C. Quinn includes frequent co-authors such as Antonio J. Ricco, Alfonso F. Dávila, J. L. Eigenbrode, C. Stoker, and Scott M. Perl. These co-authors have worked alongside Quinn on multiple occasions, contributing to various projects and publications.

Best Publications

  • Detection of Perchlorate and the Soluble Chemistry of Martian Soil at the Phoenix Lander Site

    M. H. Hecht;S. P. Kounaves;R. C. Quinn;S. J. West

  • Mars-like soils in the Atacama Desert, Chile, and the dry limit of microbial life

    Rafael Navarro-González;Fred A. Rainey;Paola Molina;Danielle R. Bagaley

  • Lunar and Planetary Science Conference

    R. Quinn;A. Elsaesser;P. Ehrenfreund;A. Ricco

  • Evidence for Calcium Carbonate at the Mars Phoenix Landing Site

    W. V. Boynton;D. W. Ming;S. P. Kounaves;S. M. M. Young

  • On the possibility of liquid water on present‐day Mars

    Robert M. Haberle;Christopher P. McKay;James Schaeffer;Nathalie A. Cabrol

  • Atmospheric origins of perchlorate on Mars and in the Atacama

    D. C. Catling;D. C. Catling;Mark Claire;K. J. Zahnle;R. C. Quinn;R. C. Quinn

  • Spectral comparison of heavily hydrated salts with disrupted terrains on Europa

    J.B. Dalton;O. Prieto-Ballesteros;J.S. Kargel;C.S. Jamieson

  • Epitaxial Directional Growth of Indium-Doped Tin Oxide Nanowire Arrays

    Pho Nguyen;Hou T. Ng;Jing Kong;Alan M. Cassell

  • Wet Chemistry experiments on the 2007 Phoenix Mars Scout Lander mission: Data analysis and results

    S. P. Kounaves;M. H. Hecht;J. Kapit;J. Kapit;K. Gospodinova;K. Gospodinova

  • Amino acid photostability on the Martian surface

    Inge Loes Ten Kate;James R. C. Garry;Zan Peeters;Richard Quinn;Richard Quinn

  • Perchlorate radiolysis on Mars and the origin of martian soil reactivity

    Richard C. Quinn;Hana F.H. Martucci;Stephanie R. Miller;Charles E. Bryson

  • Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Ammonia Glow-Discharge: Experiments and Modeling

    Bishun N. Khare;Patrick Wilhite;Richard C. Quinn;Bin Chen

  • The Icebreaker Life Mission to Mars: A Search for Biomolecular Evidence for Life

    Christopher P. McKay;Carol R. Stoker;Brian J. Glass;Arwen I. Davé

  • Soluble sulfate in the martian soil at the Phoenix landing site

    Samuel P. Kounaves;Michael H. Hecht;Jason Kapit;Jason Kapit;Richard C. Quinn

  • Earth as a Tool for Astrobiology—A European Perspective

    Zita Martins;Hervé Cottin;Julia Michelle Kotler;Nathalie Carrasco

  • Habitability of the Phoenix landing site

    Carol R. Stoker;Aaron Zent;David C. Catling;Susanne Douglas

  • Simultaneous adsorption of CO2 and H2O under Mars‐like conditions and application to the evolution of the Martian climate

    Aaron P. Zent;Richard C. Quinn

  • Hydroxyl (OH) production on airless planetary bodies: Evidence from H+/D+ ion-beam experiments

    A.S. Ichimura;A.P. Zent;R.C. Quinn;M.R. Sanchez

  • Rainfall limit of the N cycle on Earth

    Stephanie A. Ewing;Greg Michalski;Mark Thiemens;Richard C. Quinn

  • Peroxide-modified titanium dioxide: a chemical analog of putative Martian soil oxidants.

    Richard C. Quinn;Aaron P. Zent

  • Mars Extant Life: What's Next? Conference Report.

    D. W. Beaty;M. A. Meyer;J. G. Blank

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio J. Ricco
Antonio J. Ricco Ames Research Center
Aaron P. Zent
Aaron P. Zent Ames Research Center
Christopher P. McKay
Christopher P. McKay Ames Research Center
David C. Catling
David C. Catling University of Washington
Mark A. Sephton
Mark A. Sephton Imperial College London
Alfonso F. Davila
Alfonso F. Davila Ames Research Center
Wayne L. Nicholson
Wayne L. Nicholson University of Florida
Douglas W. Ming
Douglas W. Ming National Aeronautics and Space Administration
William V. Boynton
William V. Boynton University of Arizona
Daniel P. Glavin
Daniel P. Glavin Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse career paths, often intersecting with other vital fields. For example, pursuing a geologist degree online can deepen your understanding of Earth processes, essential for environmental consulting and natural resource management.

Another promising avenue is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), where spatial data analysis plays a crucial role in environmental planning. The best GIS undergraduate programs offer specialized training to equip students with these in-demand skills.

Environmental policy and administration are also key to addressing global challenges. Online programs like the online MPA degrees prepare students for leadership roles in government and nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Lastly, understanding human social dynamics is essential in environmental decision-making. Earning an online sociology bachelor programs degree can provide insights into community impacts and promote effective environmental advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Richard C. Quinn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles