World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 58 124 107 74 61 221 35966

Jens Hainmueller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jens Hainmueller between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jens Hainmueller published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 20.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 114 publications in 2020. 13 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 114. Peak 114 publications in 2020. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 100 publications 2020: 114 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2005 2025

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jens Hainmueller: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 3
2007 7
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 19
2012 8
2013 26
2014 14
2015 30
2016 18
2017 31
2018 10
2019 100
2020 114
2021 10
2022 7
2023 5
2024 5
2025 8
Total 429
Download as CSV

Jens Hainmueller publications per year - data summary

  • Jens Hainmueller, a Political Science scholar from Stanford University, has 429 publications recorded across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2005 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 114 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2006, 2008 and 2009, with 3 publications each.
  • The rate of publication averages 20.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 20.4 per year counting only the 21 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2005-2011: 43 publications (6.1 per year); 2012-2018: 137 publications (19.6 per year); 2019-2025: 249 publications (35.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jens Hainmueller publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Hainmueller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–225 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 221 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17 221
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Jens Hainmueller publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Jens Hainmueller, a Political Science scholar from Stanford University, records 221 publications - the 84th percentile of the discipline.
  • 84% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Jens Hainmueller, and about 16% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Jens Hainmueller ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Jens Hainmueller D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Hainmueller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12 58
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Jens Hainmueller D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Jens Hainmueller, a Political Science scholar from Stanford University, records 58 D-Index - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Jens Hainmueller, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Jens Hainmueller ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Overview

Jens Hainmueller is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans several subfields, including Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, and General Decision Sciences.

The main topics of Jens Hainmueller's work include Migration and Labor Dynamics, Migration, Health and Trauma, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Migration, Refugees, and Integration, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, and Global Health Workforce Issues.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jens Hainmueller cover a range of subjects and publication venues. Notable works include:

  • Attitudes Toward Migrants in a Highly Impacted Economy: Evidence From the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Jordan (2020, Comparative Political Studies)
  • Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Election Outcomes: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect (2022, Political Analysis)
  • Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments (2020, Political Analysis)
  • Europeans' support for refugees of varying background is stable over time (2023, Nature)
  • Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Elections: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect (AMCE) (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)

Jens Hainmueller frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Kirk Bansak
  • Avidit Acharya
  • Dominik Hangartner
  • Duncan Lawrence
  • Jeremy M. Weinstein

Their publications have appeared in leading venues such as Harvard Dataverse, Political Analysis, arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, and AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.

Best Publications

  • Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program

    Alberto Abadie;Alexis Diamond;Jens Hainmueller

  • Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies

    Jens Hainmueller

  • Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method

    Alberto Abadie;Alexis Diamond;Jens Hainmueller

  • Public Attitudes Toward Immigration

    Jens Hainmueller;Daniel J. Hopkins

  • Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments

    Jens Hainmueller;Daniel J. Hopkins;Teppei Yamamoto

  • Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe

    Jens Hainmueller;Michael J. Hiscox

  • Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

    Jens Hainmueller;Michael J. Hiscox

  • Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Teppei Yamamoto

  • ebalance: A Stata Package for Entropy Balancing

    Jens Hainmueller;Yiqing Xu

  • The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants

    Jens Hainmueller;Daniel J. Hopkins

  • How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

    Jens Hainmueller;Jonathan Mummolo;Yiqing Xu

  • How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers

    Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers

    Kirk Bansak;Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner

  • Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade

    Jens Hainmueller;Michael J. Hiscox

  • Synth: An R Package for Synthetic Control Methods in Comparative Case Studies

    Alberto Abadie;Alexis Diamond;Jens Hainmueller

  • On the validity of the regression discontinuity design for estimating electoral effects: : new evidence from over 40,000 close races

    Andrew C. Eggers;Anthony Fowler;Jens Hainmueller;Andrew B. Hall

  • How Lasting Is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short‐ and Long‐Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy

    Michael M. Bechtel;Jens Hainmueller

  • Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner

  • MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics

    Andrew C. Eggers;Jens Hainmueller

  • Preferences for International Redistribution: The Divide over the Eurozone Bailouts

    Michael M. Bechtel;Jens Hainmueller;Yotam Margalit

  • Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment

    Kirk Bansak;Jeremy Ferwerda;Jeremy Ferwerda;Jens Hainmueller;Andrea Dillon

  • When lives are put on hold: Lengthy asylum processes decrease employment among refugees

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Duncan Lawrence

  • Kernel Regularized Least Squares: Reducing Misspecification Bias with a Flexible and Interpretable Machine Learning Approach

    Jens Hainmueller;Chad Hazlett

  • Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes

    Holger Lutz Kern;Jens Hainmueller

  • Incumbency as a source of spillover effects in mixed electoral systems: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design

    Jens Hainmueller;Holger Lutz Kern

  • Protecting unauthorized immigrant mothers improves their children's mental health.

    Jens Hainmueller;Duncan Lawrence;Linna Martén;Linna Martén;Bernard Black

  • Multidimensional measure of immigrant integration.

    Niklas Harder;Lucila Figueroa;Rachel M. Gillum;Dominik Hangartner

  • The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments

    Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Daniel J. Hopkins;Teppei Yamamoto

  • Naturalization fosters the long-term political integration of immigrants

    Jens Hainmueller;Dominik Hangartner;Dominik Hangartner;Giuseppe Pietrantuono;Giuseppe Pietrantuono

  • Conjoint Survey Experiments

    Kirk Bansak;Jens Hainmueller;Daniel J. Hopkins;Teppei Yamamoto

  • Do Concerns about Labour Market Competition Shape Attitudes Toward Immigration? New Evidence

    Jens Hainmueller;Michael J. Hiscox;Yotam M. Margalit

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Hopkins
Daniel J. Hopkins University of Pennsylvania
Jeremy M. Weinstein
Jeremy M. Weinstein Harvard University
David D. Laitin
David D. Laitin Stanford University
Andrew C. Eggers
Andrew C. Eggers University of Chicago
Marc Helbling
Marc Helbling University of Mannheim
James M. Snyder
James M. Snyder Harvard University
Beth A. Simmons
Beth A. Simmons University of Pennsylvania
Eric F. Lambin
Eric F. Lambin Stanford University
Albert Heim
Albert Heim Hannover Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online study options and careers. If you’re looking to accelerate your education, you might consider enrolling in a shortest online masters degree to quickly enhance your qualifications and enter the workforce sooner.

Affordability is another key concern for many students. Researching cheap online college classes can help minimize student debt while receiving a quality education. These cost-effective options make it easier for students to pursue additional interests or double majors.

A Political Science background is also highly relevant for careers focused on sustainability and the environment. For instance, if you are interested in making an impact as a consultant, learn how to become a sustainability consultant.

Strong analytical skills are also in demand in this field. Earning an online mathematics degree can open up additional pathways in research, policy analysis, and data-driven roles related to Political Science.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Hainmueller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles