World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Janellen Huttenlocher

Janellen Huttenlocher

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
25725
World Ranking
1849
National Ranking
1091

Janellen Huttenlocher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janellen Huttenlocher sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janellen Huttenlocher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janellen Huttenlocher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2008 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association

Overview

Janellen Huttenlocher was affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the field of psychology with a focus reflected by the recognition they received from professional associations.

They were honored with the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2013, which acknowledges significant intellectual contributions to the basic science of psychology. Earlier, in 2008, they received the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association, highlighting impactful research achievements within the discipline.

Although specific details regarding their research papers, topics of study, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications are not available, their affiliation and awards indicate an established presence in psychological science. The absence of listed recent papers and frequent collaborators does not diminish the documented recognitions from major psychology organizations.

Janellen Huttenlocher's career is marked by these honors, suggesting a professional trajectory significant within the field of psychology as recognized by peers and leading organizations. Their work was situated within the academic environment of the University of Chicago, a center with a longstanding reputation for contributions to psychological research.

Best Publications

  • Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender.

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Wendy Haight;Anthony Bryk;Michael Seltzer

  • Language input and child syntax

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Marina Vasilyeva;Elina Cymerman;Susan Levine

  • Sources of variability in children’s language growth

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Heidi Waterfall;Marina Vasilyeva;Jack Vevea

  • Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Larry V. Hedges;Susan Duncan

  • Preschool children's mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher "math talk.".

    Raquel S. Klibanoff;Susan C. Levine;Janellen Huttenlocher;Marina Vasilyeva

  • Early sex differences in spatial skill.

    Susan C. Levine;Janellen Huttenlocher;Amy Taylor;Adela Langrock

  • Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning

    Nora S. Newcombe;Janellen Huttenlocher

  • Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.

    Janellen Huttenlocher

  • What Counts in the Development of Young Children's Number Knowledge?

    Susan C. Levine;Linda Whealton Suriyakham;Meredith Lee Rowe;Janellen Huttenlocher

  • Children's spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter?

    Shannon M. Pruden;Susan C. Levine;Janellen Huttenlocher

  • Early Puzzle Play: A predictor of preschoolers’ spatial transformation skill

    Susan C. Levine;Kristin R. Ratliff;Janellen Huttenlocher;Joanna Cannon

  • Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them?

    Kelly S. Mix;Janellen Huttenlocher;Susan C. Levine

  • Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill

    Susan C. Levine;Marina Vasilyeva;Stella F. Lourenco;Nora S. Newcombe

  • Why do categories affect stimulus judgment

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Larry V. Hedges;Jack L. Vevea

  • Bayesian integration of spatial information

    Ken Cheng;Sara J. Shettleworth;Janellen Huttenlocher;John J. Rieser

  • Syntactic priming in young children

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Marina Vasilyeva;Priya Shimpi

  • Quantitative Development in Infancy and Early Childhood

    Kelly S. Mix;Janellen Huttenlocher;Susan Cohen Levine

  • The varieties of speech to young children

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Marina Vasilyeva;Heidi R. Waterfall;Jack L. Vevea

  • A mental model for early arithmetic

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Nancy C. Jordan;Susan Cohen Levine

  • The Coding of Spatial Location in Young Children

    J. Huttenlocher;N. Newcombe;E.H. Sandberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan C. Levine
Susan C. Levine University of Chicago
Nora S. Newcombe
Nora S. Newcombe Temple University
Larry V. Hedges
Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University
Stella F. Lourenco
Stella F. Lourenco Emory University
Nancy C. Jordan
Nancy C. Jordan University of Delaware
Kelly S. Mix
Kelly S. Mix University of Maryland, College Park
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University
Meredith L. Rowe
Meredith L. Rowe Harvard University
Steven L. Small
Steven L. Small The University of Texas at Dallas
Herbert H. Clark
Herbert H. Clark Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up various career pathways—such as counseling, school psychology, or mental health services. One major consideration for prospective students is cost. Fortunately, students nationwide have more options than ever for affordable programs, making education accessible regardless of location.

If you are considering becoming a counselor in Colorado, check out the cheapest counseling degrees in Colorado for budget-friendly options. Students in Connecticut can explore affordable counseling degrees in Connecticut to find programs that align with both their career aspirations and financial circumstances.

Those residing in the Midwest will benefit from researching affordable counseling programs in Des Moines, which provide flexible options for local and remote learners alike. Similarly, students in the Southeast can review affordable counseling degrees in Florida, helping streamline the path from education to professional licensure.

Choosing the right program requires careful research on cost, accreditation, and career outcomes to ensure your investment leads to meaningful opportunities in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Janellen Huttenlocher