World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
41
Citations
15584
World Ranking
6787
National Ranking
1839

Gregory L. Fenves publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory L. Fenves sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 124 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Gregory L. Fenves D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory L. Fenves sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to computational modeling, creation of open source software for earthquake engineering analysis, and academic leadership.

Overview

Gregory L. Fenves is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on engineering with specific contributions to civil and structural engineering as well as computational mechanics.

The main topics of Fenves's work include:

  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

Fenves has published in the following venues:

  • Journal of Structural Engineering

One recent paper authored by Fenves is titled "Erratum for 'Krylov Subspace Accelerated Newton Algorithm: Application to Dynamic Progressive Collapse Simulation of Frames' by Michael H. Scott and Gregory L. Fenves," published in 2020 in the Journal of Structural Engineering.

Frequently collaborating with Michael H. Scott, Fenves has coauthored research that intersects structural engineering and computational analysis.

In 2014, Fenves was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Engineering for their work on computational modeling, the creation of open source software for earthquake engineering analysis, and academic leadership.

Best Publications

  • Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures

    Jeeho Lee;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks

    Sukun Kim;Shamim Pakzad;David Culler;James Demmel

  • Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition

    Frank McKenna;Frank McKenna;Frank McKenna;Michael H. Scott;Michael H. Scott;Michael H. Scott;Gregory L. Fenves;Gregory L. Fenves;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements

    Michael H. Scott;Gregory L. Fenves;Gregory L. Fenves

  • A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams

    Jeeho Lee;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Object-oriented finite element programming: frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing

    Francis Thomas Mckenna;Gregory L. Fenves

  • SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION IN BUILDINGS. I: ANALYTICAL METHODS

    Jonathan P. Stewart;Gregory L. Fenves;Raymond B. Seed

  • Design and Implementation of Scalable Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Monitoring

    Shamim N. Pakzad;Gregory L. Fenves;Sukun Kim;David E. Culler

  • Characterization and Modeling of Friction Pendulum Bearings Subjected to Multiple Components of Excitation

    Gilberto Mosqueda;Andrew S. Whittaker;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including reservoir bottom absorption and dam-water-foundation rock interaction.

    Gregory L Fenves;Anil K. Chopra

  • Software framework for distributed experimental-computational simulation of structural systems

    Yoshikazu Takahashi;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Object-oriented programming for engineering software development

    Gregory L Fenves

  • Wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring

    Sukun Kim;Shamim Pakzad;David Culler;James Demmel

  • Krylov Subspace Accelerated Newton Algorithm: Application to Dynamic Progressive Collapse Simulation of Frames

    Michael H. Scott;Gregory L. Fenves

  • System identification for evaluating soil–structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings

    Jonathan P. Stewart;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Effects of reservoir bottom absorption and dam-water-foundation rock interaction on frequency response functions for concrete gravity dams

    Gregory L Fenves;Anil K. Chopra

  • Statistical Analysis of Vibration Modes of a Suspension Bridge Using Spatially Dense Wireless Sensor Network

    Shamim N. Pakzad;Shamim N. Pakzad;Gregory L. Fenves;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Earthquake analysis and response of concrete gravity dams.

    G. Fenves;A. K. Chopra

  • Seismic Damage Detection of a Full-Scale Shaking Table Test Structure

    Xiaodong Ji;Gregory L. Fenves;Kouichi Kajiwara;Masayoshi Nakashima

  • A return-mapping algorithm for plastic-damage models: 3-D and plane stress formulation

    Jeeho Lee;Gregory L. Fenves

  • Effects of reservoir bottom absorption on earthquake response of concrete gravity dams

    Gregory L Fenves;Anil K. Chopra

Frequent Co-Authors

Anil K. Chopra
Anil K. Chopra University of California, Berkeley
Andrew S. Whittaker
Andrew S. Whittaker University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jonathan P. Stewart
Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles
Filip C. Filippou
Filip C. Filippou University of California, Berkeley
Raymond B. Seed
Raymond B. Seed University of California, Berkeley
Reginald DesRoches
Reginald DesRoches Rice University
David E. Culler
David E. Culler University of California, Berkeley
Masayoshi Nakashima
Masayoshi Nakashima Kyoto University
James Demmel
James Demmel University of California, Berkeley
George P. Petropoulos
George P. Petropoulos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology shapes the future of work, studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens diverse career pathways. Online education lets you gain in-demand skills on a flexible schedule, with many accredited programs now offering specialized degrees.

For example, a ux design online degree can prepare you for creative roles in web and app development, one of the fastest-growing tech fields. Leadership-oriented students might wonder, "is a project management degree worth it?"—and discover that project management training is highly valued across industries for bringing ideas to life efficiently.

If you’re interested in cutting-edge financial innovation, a masters in crypto provides advanced knowledge in blockchain and fintech, two vital areas for the future of banking and security.

Tech knowledge is also in demand outside traditional STEM fields. In the sports industry, the sports management programs online combine technology and leadership, unlocking opportunities in management and analytics for sports organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory L. Fenves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles