World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10694 10012 10 10 98 14542

Incheol Choi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Incheol Choi between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Incheol Choi published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2024. 30 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2024. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 12 publications
1997 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Incheol Choi: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 6
2009 2
2010 1
2011 3
2012 5
2013 6
2014 7
2015 3
2016 8
2017 4
2018 8
2019 6
2020 10
2021 13
2022 7
2023 10
2024 18
2025 12
Total 150
Download as CSV

Incheol Choi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Incheol Choi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Incheol Choi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Incheol Choi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Incheol Choi is a researcher affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea, specializing in the field of Psychology. Their work primarily focuses on areas within social psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and health psychology. The principal topics covered in their research include psychological well-being and life satisfaction, mental health in relation to COVID-19, optimism and hope, health disparities and outcomes, as well as behavioral health interventions.

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed articles, notably:

  • How COVID-19 affected mental well-being: An 11-week trajectories of daily well-being of Koreans amidst COVID-19 by age, gender and region, 2021, published in PLoS ONE
  • Emotional well-being and gut microbiome profiles by enterotype, 2020, published in Scientific Reports
  • The Role of Coping Strategies in Maintaining Well-Being During the COVID-19 Outbreak in South Korea, 2021, published in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Individualism-collectivism during the COVID-19 pandemic: A field study testing the pathogen stress hypothesis of individualism-collectivism in Korea, 2021, published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • Psychological well-being and gene expression in Korean adults: The role of age, 2020, published in Psychoneuroendocrinology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Incheol Choi include Sung-Ha Lee, Eun-Soo Choi, Xyle Ku, Jongan Choi, and Nam Hee Kim. These collaborations have produced numerous contributions in their shared fields of interest.

The researcher has published extensively in several academic journals with notable repeat appearances in:

  • Journal of Happiness Studies
  • Studies in Modern Grammar
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Health Psychology

The main research themes surrounding this scientist emphasize psychological well-being and life satisfaction, with a significant portion dedicated to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. Their work also explores optimism, hope, and coping strategies, alongside social and health disparities, and behavioral health research interventions.

Best Publications

  • Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.

    Richard E. Nisbett;Kaiping Peng;Incheol Choi;Ara Norenzayan

  • Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality.

    Incheol Choi;Richard E. Nisbett;Ara Norenzayan

  • Individual Differences in Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking

    Incheol Choi;Minkyung Koo;Jong An Choi

  • Situational Salience and Cultural Differences in the Correspondence Bias and Actor-Observer Bias

    Incheol Choi;Richard E. Nisbett

  • Culture and judgment of causal relevance.

    Incheol Choi;Reeshad Dalal;Chu Kim-Prieto;Hyekyung Park

  • Cultural Similarities and Differences in Social Inference: Evidence from Behavioral Predictions and Lay Theories of Behavior

    Ara Norenzayan;Incheol Choi;Richard E. Nisbett

  • Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction.

    Incheol Choi;Richard E. Nisbett

  • Culture Matters When Designing a Successful Happiness-Increasing Activity: A Comparison of the United States and South Korea

    Kristin Layous;Hyunjung Lee;Incheol Choi;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • Conversing across cultures: East-West communication styles in work and nonwork contexts.

    Jeffrey Sanchez-Burks;Fiona Lee;Incheol Choi;Richard Nisbett

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning

    Iincheol Choi;Richard E. Nisbett;Edward E. Smith

  • Culture and Self-Concept Flexibility

    Incheol Choi;Yimoon Choi

  • 'It's up to you': Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks

    S. Katherine Nelson;Matthew D. Della Porta;Katherine Jacobs Bao;HyunJung Crystal Lee

  • Eastern and Western perceptions of causality for social behavior: Lay theories about personalities and situations.

    Ara Norenzayan;Incheol Choi;Richard E. Nisbett

  • The dynamics of daily events and well-being across cultures: when less is more.

    Shigehiro Oishi;Ed Diener;Dong-Won Choi;Chu Kim-Prieto

  • Culture and First-Person Pronouns

    Jinkyung Na;Incheol Choi

  • Beyond Self-Protection Self-Affirmation Benefits Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being

    S. Katherine Nelson;Joshua A. K. Fuller;Incheol Choi;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • Need for cognitive closure and information search strategy

    Jong An Choi;Minkyung Koo;Incheol Choi;Seigyoung Auh

  • The proximal experience of gratitude

    Kristin Layous;Kate Sweeny;Christina Armenta;Soojung Na

  • Taking Stock of Happiness and Meaning in Everyday Life: An Experience Sampling Approach

    Jongan Choi;Rhia Catapano;Incheol Choi

  • Reasoning: Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic versus Analytic Cognition

    Richard E. Nisbett;Kaiping Peng;Incheol Choi;Ara Norenzayan

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Nisbett
Richard E. Nisbett University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ara Norenzayan
Ara Norenzayan University of British Columbia
Sonja Lyubomirsky
Sonja Lyubomirsky University of California, Riverside
Kaiping Peng
Kaiping Peng Tsinghua University
Eunji Lee
Eunji Lee Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
Gerald L. Clore
Gerald L. Clore University of Virginia
David A. Pizarro
David A. Pizarro Cornell University
Michael Bang Petersen
Michael Bang Petersen Aarhus University
Woong-Ryeol Yu
Woong-Ryeol Yu Seoul National University
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees are becoming increasingly popular for students seeking flexibility and accelerated study options. Many universities in the United States now offer a variety of online programs tailored to diverse educational and career goals.

Students can choose specialized tracks, such as accelerated online psychology master's programs in Virginia, perfect for those eager to advance their careers quickly. For undergraduate students, the fastest online psychology programs in Texas provide an efficient pathway to earn degrees and enter the workforce or graduate school much sooner.

Regional offerings like the fastest online psychology degrees in Washington and accelerated online psychology programs in Wisconsin emphasize both speed and quality, allowing students to balance work, family, and education.

Ultimately, these online degrees open doors to a wide range of career pathways, from counseling and mental health services to research and human resources. By choosing the right program, students can position themselves for rewarding roles in the growing field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Incheol Choi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles