World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
93
Citations
38604
World Ranking
585
National Ranking
16

Bruno Pot publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Pot sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 219 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Bruno Pot D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Pot sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Pot is a researcher affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. Their work spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, medicine, and agricultural and biological sciences. Within these domains, their research interests emphasize food science, molecular biology, infectious diseases, nutrition and dietetics, and physiology.

The central themes of Bruno Pot's scientific contributions include probiotics and fermented foods, gut microbiota and health, genomics and phylogenetic studies, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research, microbial metabolites in food biotechnology, diet and metabolism studies, and transgenic plants and their applications.

Bruno Pot has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY
  • Gut Microbiome
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Gut Microbes

Their recent papers include:

  • "A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae" (2020, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY)
  • "Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as "Probiotic" in Foods and Dietary Supplements" (2020, Frontiers in Microbiology)
  • "Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives" (2023, Gut Microbes)
  • "Live biotherapeutic products: the importance of a defined regulatory framework" (2020, Experimental & Molecular Medicine)
  • "The microbiota-gut-brain axis: pathways to better brain health. Perspectives on what we know, what we need to investigate and how to put knowledge into practice" (2022, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences)

Collaboration is an important aspect of Bruno Pot's scientific activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Charles M. A. P. Franz
  • Paola Mattarelli
  • Giovanna E. Felis
  • Magali Cordaillat-Simmons
  • Alice Rouanet

These collaborations have supported research outputs involving microbial taxonomy, probiotic evaluation, and the regulatory considerations of live biotherapeutic products.

Bruno Pot's work continues to contribute to the understanding of microbiota-related health topics and microbial genomics, underpinning advancements in food biotechnology and clinical microbiology. The diversity of topics and extensive interdisciplinary exploration reflect the integration of molecular biology techniques with applied medical and agricultural sciences.

Best Publications

  • Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic

    Colin Hill;Francisco Guarner;Gregor Reid;Glenn R. Gibson

  • A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae.

    Jinshui Zheng;Stijn Wittouck;Elisa Salvetti;Charles M A P Franz

  • Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics.

    P Vandamme;B Pot;M Gillis;P de Vos

  • Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products

    Petros A. Maragkoudakis;Georgia Zoumpopoulou;Christos Miaris;George Kalantzopoulos

  • Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes

    Alexandra Moura;Alexis Criscuolo;Hannes Pouseele;Mylène M. Maury

  • Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products.

    Robin Temmerman;Bruno Pot;Geert Huys;Jean Swings

  • Analysis of electrophoretic whole organism protein fingerprints

    Bruno Pot;Peter Vandamme;Karel Kersters

  • Polyphasic taxonomic study of the emended genus Arcobacter with Arcobacter butzleri comb. nov. and Arcobacter skirrowii sp. nov., an aerotolerant bacterium isolated from veterinary specimens

    P. Vandamme;M. Vancanneyt;B. Pot;L. Mels

  • Enhanced antiinflammatory capacity of a Lactobacillus plantarum mutant synthesizing modified teichoic acids.

    Corinne Grangette;Sophie Nutten;Sophie Nutten;Emmanuelle Palumbo;Siegfried Morath

  • Polyphasic Taxonomy of Rhizobia: Emendation of the Genus Sinorhizobium and Description of Sinorhizobium meliloti comb. nov., Sinorhizobium saheli sp. nov., and Sinorhizobium teranga sp. nov.

    Philippe De Lajudie;Anne Willems;Bruno Pot;Dirk Dewettinck

  • Correlation between in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory properties of lactic acid bacteria

    Benoit Foligne;Sophie Nutten;Corinne Grangette;Véronique Dennin

  • Probiotics as Biotherapeutic Agents: Present Knowledge and Future Prospects

    A. Mercenier;S. Pavan;B. Pot

  • Anti-inflammatory capacity of selected lactobacilli in experimental colitis is driven by NOD2-mediated recognition of a specific peptidoglycan-derived muropeptide

    Elise Macho Fernandez;Véronique Valenti;Christoph Rockel;Corinna Hermann

  • Phenotypic identification of the genus Enterococcus and differentiation of phylogenetically distinct enterococcal species and species groups.

    L.A. Devriese;B. Pot;M.D. Collins

  • Modulation of the microbial ecology of the human colon by probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics to enhance human health: An overview of enabling science and potential applications

    Robert A. Rastall;Glenn R. Gibson;Harsharnjit S. Gill;Fransisco Guarner

  • Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as "Probiotic" in Foods and Dietary Supplements.

    Sylvie Binda;Colin Hill;Eric Johansen;David Obis

  • Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives

    Unknown

  • Discovering probiotic microorganisms: in vitro, in vivo, genetic and omics approaches.

    Konstantinos Papadimitriou;Georgia Zoumpopoulou;Benoit Foligné;Voula Alexandraki

  • The genus Enterococcus

    Luc Devriese;Bruno Pot

  • Hydrogenophaga, a new genus of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria that includes Hydrogenophaga flava comb. nov. (formerly Pseudomonas flava), Hydrogenophaga palleronii (formerly Pseudomonas palleronii), Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (formerly Pseudomonas pseudoflava and Pseudomonas carboxydoflava), and Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis (formerly Pseudomonas taeniospiralis)

    A. Willems;J. Busse;M. Goor;B. Pot

  • Azospirillum halopraeferens sp. nov., a Nitrogen-Fixing Organism Associated with Roots of Kallar Grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth)

    Barbara Reinhold;Thomas Hurek;Istvan Fendrik;Bruno Pot

  • Feeding Our Immune System: Impact on Metabolism

    Isabelle Wolowczuk;Claudie Verwaerde;Odile Viltart;Odile Viltart;Anne Delanoye

Frequent Co-Authors

Karel Kersters
Karel Kersters Ghent University
Peter Vandamme
Peter Vandamme Ghent University
Luc Devriese
Luc Devriese Ghent University
Monique Gillis
Monique Gillis Ghent University
Effie Tsakalidou
Effie Tsakalidou Agricultural University of Athens
Annick Mercenier
Annick Mercenier NutriLeads (Netherlands)
Freddy Haesebrouck
Freddy Haesebrouck Ghent University
Jean Swings
Jean Swings Ghent University
Philip Supply
Philip Supply Institut Pasteur
Marc Vancanneyt
Marc Vancanneyt Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing microbiology, there are several related online degrees and career options to consider. Many students explore programs like the quickest medical billing and coding certificate online as a pathway into healthcare administration. This certification is a fast-track option for entering the medical field with strong job prospects.

If you are curious about broader medical education options, it’s helpful to explore what medical degree can i get online. This guide highlights various accredited online programs that allow students to earn credentials without traditional on-campus attendance, making healthcare education more accessible.

Public health is another complementary pathway to microbiology. Identifying which online mph programs are easiest to get into can be especially useful for microbiology students focused on epidemiology or community health roles. These degree programs often have flexible admission criteria and can enhance career opportunities in health policy and disease prevention.

Career options extend beyond research and healthcare into specialized support roles. Becoming a certified child life specialist salary highlights a career built around helping children cope with medical environments, combining science knowledge with emotional support skills. This path offers rewarding work with strong professional demand.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Pot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles