What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Particle physics
- Quantum mechanics
- Electron
Particle physics, Electron–positron annihilation, Nuclear physics, Branching fraction and Particle decay are his primary areas of study.
His study ties his expertise on Lepton together with the subject of Particle physics.
His Electron–positron annihilation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as B-factory, Particle identification, Crystallography, Resonance and Invariant mass.
His Nuclear physics research includes themes of Asymmetry and Photon.
His Branching fraction research focuses on Isospin and how it relates to Quantum chromodynamics.
His Particle decay study incorporates themes from Particle accelerator, Pair production, Pion and Annihilation.
His most cited work include:
- The BABAR detector (738 citations)
- Evidence for an excess of B̄→D( *)τ -ν ̄τ decays (550 citations)
- Measurement of an excess of B̄→D(*) τ-ν̄τ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons (513 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
D. Bernard mainly focuses on Particle physics, Nuclear physics, Electron–positron annihilation, Branching fraction and B meson.
His study connects Resonance and Particle physics.
His study on Nuclear physics is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Asymmetry.
As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Electron–positron annihilation, focusing on Dalitz plot and, on occasion, Amplitude.
His research integrates issues of Particle decay, Crystallography, Particle identification and Analytical chemistry in his study of Branching fraction.
He combines subjects such as Standard Model, Isospin and Semileptonic decay with his study of B meson.
He most often published in these fields:
- Particle physics (61.81%)
- Nuclear physics (45.32%)
- Electron–positron annihilation (39.47%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?
- Particle physics (61.81%)
- Nuclear physics (45.32%)
- Electron–positron annihilation (39.47%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Particle physics, Nuclear physics, Electron–positron annihilation, Branching fraction and Meson.
His study in CP violation, B meson, Hadron, Asymmetry and BaBar experiment are all subfields of Particle physics.
The B meson study combines topics in areas such as Isospin and Baryon.
His Nuclear physics research incorporates themes from Resonance and Photon.
He interconnects B-factory, Standard Model and Muon in the investigation of issues within Electron–positron annihilation.
His studies in Branching fraction integrate themes in fields like Lepton, Quantum chromodynamics, Form factor, Invariant mass and Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix.
Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Evidence for an excess of B̄→D( *)τ -ν ̄τ decays (550 citations)
- Measurement of an excess of B̄→D(*) τ-ν̄τ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons (513 citations)
- Search for a dark photon in e(+)e(-) collisions at BABAR. (310 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Quantum mechanics
- Particle physics
- Electron
His main research concerns Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Electron–positron annihilation, Branching fraction and CP violation.
As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Nuclear physics, narrowing it down to issues related to the Photon, and often Electron, Detector, Range and Invariant mass.
His research links Lepton with Particle physics.
His Electron–positron annihilation research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Resonance, Atomic physics, Resonance and Annihilation.
His research in Branching fraction intersects with topics in Mass spectrum and Luminosity.
Within one scientific family, D. Bernard focuses on topics pertaining to Amplitude under B-factory, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Analytical chemistry.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
