World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Saudi Arabia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 66 2083 1987 4 4 290 16738

Georgiy L. Stenchikov publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Georgiy L. Stenchikov between 1974 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Georgiy L. Stenchikov published across 53 years, from 1974 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2016. 16 of the 352 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2016. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1974 2026

352 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Georgiy L. Stenchikov: publications per year, 1974 to 2026
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 2
1976 2
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 3
1981 2
1982 2
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 6
2002 6
2003 3
2004 6
2005 6
2006 20
2007 10
2008 6
2009 14
2010 4
2011 5
2012 7
2013 11
2014 16
2015 18
2016 26
2017 25
2018 16
2019 7
2020 24
2021 11
2022 16
2023 22
2024 13
2025 15
2026 1
Total 352
Download as CSV

Georgiy L. Stenchikov publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgiy L. Stenchikov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 290 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130 290
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Georgiy L. Stenchikov D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georgiy L. Stenchikov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120 66
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Saudi Arabia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Saudi Arabia Leader Award

Overview

Georgiy L. Stenchikov is affiliated with King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions to the subfields of Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. Additional areas of study include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Earth-Surface Processes, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their work:

  • Climate Change and Weather Extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, 2022, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Business-as-usual will lead to super and ultra-extreme heatwaves in the Middle East and North Africa, 2021, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Assessment of natural and anthropogenic aerosol air pollution in the Middle East using MERRA-2, CAMS data assimilation products, and high-resolution WRF-Chem model simulations, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Synergy processing of diverse ground-based remote sensing and in situ data using the GRASP algorithm: applications to radiometer, lidar and radiosonde observations, 2021, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Improving dust simulations in WRF-Chem v4.1.3 coupled with the GOCART aerosol module, 2021, Geoscientific model development

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Alexander Ukhov
  • Suleiman Mostamandi
  • Sergey Osipov
  • Jos Lelieveld
  • Illia Shevchenko

They have published extensively in several scientific venues, with particular frequency in:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Environmetrics

Best Publications

  • The Impact of Aerosols on Solar Ultraviolet Radiation and Photochemical Smog

    R. R. Dickerson;S. Kondragunta;S. Kondragunta;G. Stenchikov;G. Stenchikov;K. L. Civerolo;K. L. Civerolo

  • Global Cooling After the Eruption of Mount Pinatubo: A Test of Climate Feedback by Water Vapor

    Brian J. Soden;Richard T. Wetherald;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Alan Robock

  • Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections

    Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Radiative forcing from the 1991 Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption

    Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Ingo Kirchner;Alan Robock;Hans-F. Graf

  • The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

    Ben Kravitz;Alan Robock;Olivier Boucher;Hauke Schmidt

  • Changes of Snow Cover, Temperature, and Radiative Heat Balance over the Northern Hemisphere

    Pavel Ya Groisman;Thomas R. Karl;Richard W. Knight;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering.

    Alan Robock;Allison Marquardt;Ben Kravitz;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols.

    Philip J Rasch;Simone Tilmes;Richard P Turco;Alan Robock

  • Spectral nudging to eliminate the effects of domain position and geometry in regional climate model simulations

    Gonzalo Miguez-Macho;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Alan Robock

  • Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions

    Simon Driscoll;Alessio Bozzo;Alessio Bozzo;Lesley J. Gray;Alan Robock

  • Arctic Oscillation response to the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption: Effects of volcanic aerosols and ozone depletion

    Georgiy Stenchikov;Alan Robock;V. Ramaswamy;M. Daniel Schwarzkopf

  • Remote sensing the phytoplankton seasonal succession of the Red Sea.

    Dionysios E. Raitsos;Yaswant Pradhan;Robert J. W. Brewin;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • The impact of dust storms on the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea

    P. Jish Prakash;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Stoitchko Kalenderski;Sergey Osipov

  • Production of lightning NOx and its vertical distribution calculated from three‐dimensional cloud‐scale chemical transport model simulations

    Lesley E. Ott;Kenneth E. Pickering;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Dale J. Allen

  • Climate model simulation of winter warming and summer cooling following the 1991 Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption

    Ingo Kirchner;Georgiy Lvovich Stenchikov;Hans F. Graf;Alan Robock

  • Assessment of Twentieth-Century Regional Surface Temperature Trends using the GFDL CM2 Coupled Models

    Thomas R. Knutson;T. L. Delworth;K. W. Dixon;Isaac M. Held

  • Arctic Oscillation response to volcanic eruptions in the IPCC AR4 climate models

    Georgiy Stenchikov;Kevin Hamilton;Ronald J. Stouffer;Alan Robock

  • Climatic response to high‐latitude volcanic eruptions

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy Stenchikov;Gavin A. Schmidt;Gavin A. Schmidt

  • Volcanic signals in oceans

    Georgiy Stenchikov;Georgiy Stenchikov;Thomas L. Delworth;V. Ramaswamy;Ronald J. Stouffer

  • Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals : Still catastrophic consequences

    Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Lightning-generated NOX and its impact on tropospheric ozone production: A three-dimensional modeling study of a Stratosphere- Troposphere Experiment: Radiation, Aerosols and Ozone (STERAO-A) thunderstorm

    Alex J. DeCaria;Alex J. DeCaria;Kenneth E. Pickering;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Lesley E. Ott

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Robock
Alan Robock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Luke D. Oman
Luke D. Oman Goddard Space Flight Center
Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Kenneth E. Pickering
Kenneth E. Pickering University of Maryland, College Park
Venkatachalam Ramaswamy
Venkatachalam Ramaswamy Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Andrew T. Wittenberg
Andrew T. Wittenberg Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Kevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton University of Hawaii at Manoa
Owen B. Toon
Owen B. Toon University of Colorado Boulder
Claudia Timmreck
Claudia Timmreck Max Planck Society
Russell R. Dickerson
Russell R. Dickerson University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields that address today’s pressing global challenges. Many students complement their environmental studies with degrees in related social sciences to better understand human-environment interactions. For those interested in societal aspects, pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree programs can provide valuable insights into social behaviors and structures influencing environmental policies.

For educators aiming to integrate environmental topics into curriculum development or policy, advanced education degrees are a practical path. Online options like education doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexibility, helping professionals earn their doctorates while continuing to work. Similarly, there are comprehensive online eds to edd programs which facilitate smooth academic progression for educators dedicated to environmental advocacy through education.

Social work also intersects with environmental concerns, especially in community resilience and disaster recovery. Those interested might explore online dsw programs that prepare graduates for leadership roles integrating social justice with environmental sustainability. Together, these pathways illustrate the diverse career opportunities stemming from environmental sciences, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary learning and advanced online degrees to meet contemporary environmental and societal challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Georgiy L. Stenchikov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles