World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
5347
World Ranking
9419
National Ranking
700

Ron Smith publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron Smith sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ron Smith D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ron Smith is affiliated with the Natural Environment Research Council in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily contributes to the broad field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a specialization in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, as well as Plant Science.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as Lichen and fungal ecology, Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology, and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions. These themes reflect a focus on the interactions between fungi, plants, and microbial communities within various ecosystems.

The recent publications by Ron Smith include studies published in well-recognized scientific venues. Notable papers are:

  • Loss of nitrogen fixing capacity in a montane lichen is linked to increased nitrogen deposition, 2022, Journal of Ecology
  • Human-Wildlife Confict: Assessing the Complexity of Stakeholder Perspectives, 2022, Lessons in Conservation

In collaboration, Ron Smith has frequently worked with several co-authors, including:

  • P. D. Crittenden
  • Christopher J. Ellis
  • Wolfgang Wanek
  • Barry Thornton
  • Leo R. Douglas

The scientist's publications are recorded in journals like Journal of Ecology and Lessons in Conservation, each with at least one publication noted. This indicates engagement with both ecological research and applied conservation discourse.

Best Publications

  • Quantifying the effect of urban tree planting on concentrations and depositions of PM10 in two UK conurbations

    A.G. McDonald;W.J. Bealey;D. Fowler;U. Dragosits

  • Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen to European ecosystems: a comparison of inferential models across the NitroEurope network

    C. R. Flechard;E. Nemitz;R. I. Smith;D. Fowler

  • Regional estimation of pollutant gas dry deposition in the UK: model description, sensitivity analyses and outputs

    R.I. Smith;D. Fowler;M.A. Sutton;C. Flechard

  • Changes in the atmospheric deposition of acidifying compounds in the UK between 1986 and 2001.

    D. Fowler;R.I. Smith;J.B.A. Muller;G. Hayman

  • Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach

    Paula A. Harrison;Robert Dunford;David Nicholas Barton;Eszter Kelemen

  • Effects of acid mist on the frost hardiness of red spruce seedlings

    D. Fowler;J. N. Cape;J. D. Deans;I. D. Leith

  • Assessment of the magnitude of ammonia emissions in the United Kingdom

    M.A. Sutton;C.J. Place;M. Eager;D. Fowler

  • Dispersion, deposition and impacts of atmospheric ammonia: quantifying local budgets and spatial variability

    M. A. Sutton;C. Milford;U. Dragosits;C. J. Place

  • Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes.

    Julen Gonzalez-Redin;Sandra Luque;Laura Poggio;Ron Smith

  • Integrating health and environmental impact analysis

    S. Reis;G. Morris;L.E. Fleming;S. Beck

  • Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies

    Jan Dick;Francis Turkelboom;Helen Woods;Irene Iniesta-Arandia

  • A review and application of the evidence for nitrogen impacts on ecosystem services

    L. Jones;A. Provins;M. Holland;G. Mills

  • A chronology of nitrogen deposition in the UK between 1900 and 2000

    D. Fowler;M. O’Donoghue;J. B. A. Muller;R. I. Smith

  • Quantifying the spatial distribution of surface ozone concentration in the UK

    M. Coyle;R.I. Smith;J.R. Stedman;K.J. Weston

  • The UK Environmental Change Network: Emerging trends in the composition of plant and animal communities and the physical environment

    M.D. Morecroft;C.E. Bealey;D.A. Beaumont;S. Benham

  • The terrestrial arthropod fauna and its habitats in northern Marguerite Bay and Alexander Island, maritime Antarctic

    Peter Convey;Ronald I. Lewis Smith

  • Accidental transfer of non-native soil organisms into Antarctica on construction vehicles

    K. A. Hughes;P. Convey;N. R. Maslen;R. I. L. Smith

  • Modelling photochemical oxidant formation, transport, deposition and exposure of terrestrial ecosystems.

    D. Fowler;J.N. Cape;M. Coyle;R.I. Smith

  • (Poly)phenolic compounds in pollen and spores of Antarctic plants as indicators of solar UV-B – A new proxy for the reconstruction of past solar UV-B?

    J. Rozema;A.J. Noordijk;R.A. Broekman;A. van Beem

  • A spatial analysis of atmospheric ammonia and ammonium in the U.K.

    M.A. Sutton;Y.S. Tang;U. Dragosits;N. Fournier

Frequent Co-Authors

David Fowler
David Fowler University of Saskatchewan
John N. Cape
John N. Cape Stockholm University
Mark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton Natural Environment Research Council
Eiko Nemitz
Eiko Nemitz UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Lucy J. Sheppard
Lucy J. Sheppard UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Ian D. Leith
Ian D. Leith UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Ulrike Dragosits
Ulrike Dragosits UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Anthony J. Dore
Anthony J. Dore University of Manchester
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Peter Convey
Peter Convey British Antarctic Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and provide specialized skills. Many find that combining this field with General Studies offers a flexible, interdisciplinary approach. Budget friendly online general studies degree programs are great for those seeking affordability without sacrificing quality.

Some learners prefer degrees that are considered less demanding yet valuable in the job market. The easiest bachelor's degree to get may appeal to those who want to balance study with other commitments while still gaining relevant knowledge in science and sustainability.

For a more focused approach, geology is a closely related discipline. Many universities now offer geology degrees online, allowing students to study earth processes and environmental impacts without relocating. This skill set is highly applicable in environmental consulting and resource management careers.

Another fast-growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The best GIS graduate programs can prepare graduates for roles involving spatial data analysis, crucial for environmental planning and conservation efforts. Integrating GIS expertise with Environmental Sciences can enhance employability and career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Ron Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles