World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen L. Smith

Stephen L. Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
14219
World Ranking
3069
National Ranking
170

Stephen L. Smith publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 206 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stephen L. Smith D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen L. Smith is a researcher affiliated with the University of Guelph in Canada. Their work spans multiple areas within computer science and engineering, particularly focusing on robotics and control systems. They have contributed extensively to research in control and systems engineering, artificial intelligence, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their research themes include robotic path planning algorithms, optimization and search problems, advanced control systems optimization, and human-automation interaction and safety. Additional focuses include reinforcement learning applications in robotics, robot manipulation and learning, and control systems and identification.

Frequent coauthors in their body of work are:

  • Nils Wilde
  • Armin Sadeghi
  • Alexander Botros
  • Abhinav Dahiya
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn

Stephen L. Smith has published in several venues with multiple contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics
  • 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems

Notable recent publications include:

  • A survey of multi-agent Human-Robot Interaction systems, 2022, Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • The diffusion of Airbnb: a comparative look at earlier adopters, later adopters, and non-adopters, 2020, Current Issues in Tourism
  • Optimal Partitioning of Non-Convex Environments for Minimum Turn Coverage Planning, 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Safety-Critical Control of Stochastic Systems using Stochastic Control Barrier Functions, 2021, 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
  • Learning Control Barrier Functions with High Relative Degree for Safety-Critical Control, 2021, 2021 European Control Conference (ECC)

Their main fields of study consist of:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, their subfields of study are:

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Best Publications

  • Tourism Analysis: A Handbook

    Stephen L J Smith

  • THE TOURISM PRODUCT

    Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Why Tourists Choose Airbnb: A Motivation-Based Segmentation Study:

    Daniel Guttentag;Stephen Smith;Luke Potwarka;Mark Havitz

  • Segmenting Canadian Culinary Tourists

    Elena Ignatov;Stephen Smith

  • Assessing Airbnb as a disruptive innovation relative to hotels: Substitution and comparative performance expectations

    Daniel A. Guttentag;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Defining tourism a supply-side view

    Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Residents’ attitudes to tourism: a longitudinal study of 140 articles from 1984 to 2010

    Robin Nunkoo;Stephen L. J. Smith;Haywantee Ramkissoon

  • Culinary Tourism Supply Chains: A Preliminary Examination

    Stephen L. J. Smith;Honggen Xiao

  • The making of tourism research: Insights from a Social Sciences Journal

    Honggen Xiao;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Practical Tourism Research

    Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems

    Marco Pavone;Stephen L Smith;Emilio Frazzoli;Daniela Rus

  • Planning Paths for Package Delivery in Heterogeneous Multirobot Teams

    Neil Mathew;Stephen L. Smith;Steven L. Waslander

  • Case studies in tourism research: A state-of-the-art analysis

    Honggen Xiao;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Political economy of tourism: trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants.

    Robin Nunkoo;Robin Nunkoo;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Ethnic tourism development:: Chinese Government Perspectives

    Li Yang;Geoffrey Wall;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Dynamic Vehicle Routing for Robotic Systems

    F. Bullo;E. Frazzoli;M. Pavone;K. Savla

  • Tourism Statistics

    Unknown

  • The use of Tourism knowledge: Research Propositions

    Honggen Xiao;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Optimal Control of Markov Decision Processes With Linear Temporal Logic Constraints

    Xuchu Ding;Stephen L. Smith;Calin Belta;Daniela Rus

  • Profiling Taiwanese ecotourists using a self-definition approach.

    Chang-Hung (Teresa) Tao;Paul F.J. Eagles;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Ethnic representations: destination imagery.

    Christine N. Buzinde;Carla Almeida Santos;Stephen L.J. Smith

  • A Test Of Plog's Allocentric/Psychocentric Model: Evidence From Seven Nations

    Stephen L.J. Smith

  • Submodularity and greedy algorithms in sensor scheduling for linear dynamical systems

    Syed Talha Jawaid;Stephen L. Smith

  • GLNS: An effective large neighborhood search heuristic for the Generalized Traveling Salesman Problem

    Stephen L. Smith;Frank Imeson

  • Dynamic Vehicle Routing for Robotic Systems Planning optimal routes for multiple vehicles performing different tasks is discussed; fundamental limits on achievable performance are established for tasks that are generated by exogenous processes.

    Francesco Bullo;Emilio Frazzoli;Marco Pavone;Ketan Savla

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Bullo
Francesco Bullo University of California, Santa Barbara
Calin Belta
Calin Belta Boston University
Dana Kulic
Dana Kulic Monash University
Honggen Xiao
Honggen Xiao Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Marco Pavone
Marco Pavone Stanford University
Mac Schwager
Mac Schwager Stanford University
Krzysztof Czarnecki
Krzysztof Czarnecki University of Waterloo
Bruce A. Francis
Bruce A. Francis University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA has never been more flexible, thanks to a variety of online options. Students can choose from programs designed to fit different schedules, budgets, and career goals.

Affordability is a key factor for many. If you’re researching how much does a masters in psychology cost, you’ll find that online programs can offer significant savings compared to traditional on-campus options.

Looking for speed? There are programs tailored for quick completion, such as the shortest edd program online, which allow you to earn an advanced degree on an accelerated timeline.

Broader options like an online masters degree or accelerated online degrees provide additional flexibility for those balancing work and study. These pathways can open doors to careers in teaching, research, counseling, and beyond.

No matter your circumstances, there’s likely an online Social Sciences or Humanities program that aligns with your ambitions and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen L. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles