World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Political Science
Italy
2026
Award Badge
Law and Political Science
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
50
Citations
15745
World Ranking
234
National Ranking
8

Mark N. Franklin publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark N. Franklin sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 173 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Mark N. Franklin D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark N. Franklin sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Political Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Political Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Law and Political Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Law and Political Science in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Mark N. Franklin is affiliated with the European University Institute in Italy. Their academic work primarily spans the Social Sciences with a particular focus on Political Science and International Relations. Subfields contributing to their research include Ocean Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, and Demography.

Their research addresses diverse topics, prominently featuring Electoral Systems and Political Participation. Additional areas of focus include Social Policy and Reform Studies, Populism and Right-Wing Movements, Gender Politics and Representation, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Culture, Economy, and Development Studies, as well as Political Influence and Corporate Strategies.

Their recent publications demonstrate a sustained engagement with electoral and political science issues. Notable papers include:

  • "Early voting experiences and habit formation" (2023) published in Political Science Research and Methods
  • "Clarity of voter choices: neglected foundation for ideological congruence" (2021) published in Quaderni dell Osservatorio elettorale QOE - IJES
  • "The 2019 European Elections: something old, something new, something borrowed, and something green" (2020) published in Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
  • "Pilot Program for Digitally Validating Well Barrier Integrity During Inflow Testing" (2022) published in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • "From ideological congruence to satisfaction with democracy: how leverage can mitigate the ill-effects of party polarization" (2023) published in Political Research Exchange

Frequent coauthors include Luana Russo, Elias Dinas, Vicente Valentim, Nikolaj Broberg, and Stefanie Beyens, indicating collaborative work across multiple research projects.

Mark N. Franklin publishes across several recognized venues, such as:

  • Political Science Research and Methods
  • Quaderni dell Osservatorio elettorale QOE - IJES
  • Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • Political Research Exchange

Best Publications

  • Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945

    Mark N. Franklin;Cees van der Eijk;Diana Evans;Michael Fotos

  • Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries

    Mark N. Franklin;Thomas T. Mackie;Henry Valen

  • Choosing Europe?: The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union

    C. van der Eijk;Mark N. Franklin

  • The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries

    Wouter van der Brug;Cees van der EijK;Mark Franklin

  • Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht

    C. van der Eijk;M.N. Franklin;M. Marsh

  • Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht

    Mark Franklin;Michael Marsh;Lauren McLAREN

  • Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies

    Eric C. Browne;Mark N. Franklin

  • The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice, 1964-1983

    Mark N. Franklin

  • Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities

    Cees van der Eijk;Wouter van der Brug;Martin Kroh;Mark Franklin

  • European Integration and Political Conflict: Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe

    Cees Van Der Eijk;Mark N. Franklin

  • Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity

    Christopher Wlezien;Mark Franklin;Daniel Twiggs

  • What voters teach us about Europe-Wide elections: What Europe-Wide elections teach us about voters

    Cees Van Der Eijk;Mark N. Franklin;Michael Marsh

  • The dynamics of electoral participation

    M.N. Franklin

  • The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification

    Mark N. Franklin;Christopher Wlezien

  • Electoral Engineering and Cross-National Turnout Differences: What Role for Compulsory Voting?

    Mark N. Franklin

  • Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election

    Richard G. Niemi;Guy Written;Mark N. Franklin

  • Attitudes toward Europe and referendum votes: A response to Siune and Svensson

    Mark Franklin;Michael Marsh;Christopher Wlezien

  • Elections and Voters

    Cees Van Der Eijk;Mark N. Franklin

  • Generational Basis of Turnout Decline in Established Democracies

    Mark N Franklin;Mark N Franklin;Patrick Lyons;Michael Marsh

  • The Legacy of Lethargy: How elections to the European Parliament depress turnout

    Mark N. Franklin;Sara B. Hobolt

  • Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century

    Unknown

  • Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945: Rational Responses to Electoral Competition

    Mark N. Franklin;Cees van der Eijk;Diana Evans;Michael Fotos

Frequent Co-Authors

Wouter van der Brug
Wouter van der Brug University of Amsterdam
Michael Marsh
Michael Marsh Trinity College Dublin
Wolfgang Rudig
Wolfgang Rudig University of Strathclyde
Christopher Wlezien
Christopher Wlezien The University of Texas at Austin
Sara B. Hobolt
Sara B. Hobolt London School of Economics and Political Science
Rachel Gibson
Rachel Gibson University of Manchester
Richard G. Niemi
Richard G. Niemi University of Rochester
Edward Fieldhouse
Edward Fieldhouse University of Manchester
Bernard Grofman
Bernard Grofman University of California, Irvine
Alexander H. Trechsel
Alexander H. Trechsel University of Lucerne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to varied and rewarding careers, but you might also consider other online degrees to further expand your options. Many students explore complementary fields, such as Environmental Science, which allows you to make an impact through roles in government, nonprofits, or research. See some examples of jobs with bachelor's in elementary education and environmental science to understand your career prospects in policy, advocacy, or education.

Pursuing a Political Science degree online can be cost-effective. Explore the online university cheapest options to ensure your studies are affordable and accessible. You may also consider allied fields such as mathematics, which is highly valued for research and data analysis roles. Discover more about the mathematics bachelor degree online for versatile career preparation.

Additionally, public policy and library science often intersect with Political Science in areas like information management, government archives, and advocacy. Explore the best online library science degree to expand your knowledge and career possibilities within these sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Mark N. Franklin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles