World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ryan T. LaLumiere

Ryan T. LaLumiere

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 33 9436 8706 3989 3607 78 5361

Ryan T. LaLumiere publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ryan T. LaLumiere between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ryan T. LaLumiere published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2025. 15 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2025. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
2003 2025

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ryan T. LaLumiere: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 0
2007 2
2008 4
2009 2
2010 2
2011 1
2012 3
2013 3
2014 6
2015 3
2016 2
2017 5
2018 2
2019 6
2020 3
2021 7
2022 4
2023 4
2024 7
2025 8
Total 80
Download as CSV

Ryan T. LaLumiere publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan T. LaLumiere sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 78
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ryan T. LaLumiere D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan T. LaLumiere sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172 33
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ryan T. LaLumiere is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a specific emphasis on cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, behavioral neuroscience, and social psychology.

The main topics of LaLumiere's work include memory and neural mechanisms, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, stress responses and cortisol, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, and ion transport and channel regulation.

LaLumiere has contributed to a number of recent publications, including:

  • "Amygdala-hippocampal interactions in synaptic plasticity and memory formation" (2021) published in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • "Infralimbic cortex functioning across motivated behaviors: Can the differences be reconciled?" (2021) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Bed nuclei of the stria terminalis modulate memory consolidation via glucocorticoid-dependent and -independent circuits" (2020) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Daily Optogenetic Stimulation of the Left Infralimbic Cortex Reverses Extinction Impairments in Male Rats Exposed to Single Prolonged Stress" (2021) published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "The medial entorhinal cortex mediates basolateral amygdala effects on spatial memory and downstream activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein expression" (2020) published in Neuropsychopharmacology

Frequent co-authors with whom LaLumiere has collaborated include:

  • Kelle E. Nett
  • Jason J. Radley
  • Matthew S. McGregor
  • Subhash C. Gupta
  • John A. Wemmie

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, with notable frequent publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Addiction Biology

Best Publications

  • Infralimbic Prefrontal Cortex is Responsible for Inhibiting Cocaine Seeking in Extinguished Rats

    Jamie Peters;Ryan T. LaLumiere;Peter W. Kalivas

  • Glutamate Release in the Nucleus Accumbens Core Is Necessary for Heroin Seeking

    Ryan T LaLumiere;Peter W Kalivas

  • Glutamate transmission in addiction.

    Peter W. Kalivas;Ryan T. LaLumiere;Lori Knackstedt;Haowei Shen

  • Post-Training Intra-Basolateral Amygdala Infusions of Norepinephrine Enhance Consolidation of Memory for Contextual Fear Conditioning

    Ryan T. LaLumiere;Thea-Vanessa Buen;James L. McGaugh

  • Optogenetic inhibition of cocaine seeking in rats

    Michael T. Stefanik;Khaled Moussawi;Yonatan M. Kupchik;Kyle C. Smith

  • Extinction Training after Cocaine Self-Administration Induces Glutamatergic Plasticity to Inhibit Cocaine Seeking

    Lori A. Knackstedt;Khaled Moussawi;Ryan Lalumiere;Marek Schwendt

  • The infralimbic cortex regulates the consolidation of extinction after cocaine self-administration

    Ryan T. LaLumiere;Kate E. Niehoff;Peter W. Kalivas

  • Acid-sensing ion channels contribute to synaptic transmission and inhibit cocaine-evoked plasticity

    Collin J Kreple;Yuan Lu;Rebecca J Taugher;Andrea L Schwager-Gutman

  • Neural circuit competition in cocaine-seeking: roles of the infralimbic cortex and nucleus accumbens shell

    Ryan T. LaLumiere;Kyle C. Smith;Peter W. Kalivas

  • A single intra-PFC infusion of BDNF prevents cocaine-induced alterations in extracellular glutamate within the nucleus accumbens.

    William J. Berglind;Timothy W. Whitfield;Ryan T. LaLumiere;Peter W. Kalivas

  • Ceftriaxone normalizes nucleus accumbens synaptic transmission, glutamate transport, and export following cocaine self-administration and extinction training

    Heather Trantham-Davidson;Ryan T. LaLumiere;Kathryn J. Reissner;Peter W. Kalivas

  • Modulation of memory consolidation by the basolateral amygdala or nucleus accumbens shell requires concurrent dopamine receptor activation in both brain regions.

    Ryan T. LaLumiere;Erene M. Nawar;James L. McGaugh

  • Blockade of noradrenergic receptors in the basolateral amygdala impairs taste memory

    M. I. Miranda;R. T. LaLumiere;T. V. Buen;F. Bermudez-Rattoni

  • Post-training intrabasolateral amygdala infusions of dopamine modulate consolidation of inhibitory avoidance memory: involvement of noradrenergic and cholinergic systems

    Ryan T Lalumiere;Linda T Nguyen;James L McGaugh

  • Posttraining optogenetic manipulations of basolateral amygdala activity modulate consolidation of inhibitory avoidance memory in rats

    Mary L. Huff;Rachel L. Miller;Karl Deisseroth;David E. Moorman

  • A new technique for controlling the brain: optogenetics and its potential for use in research and the clinic

    Ryan T. LaLumiere

  • Glutamate: the new frontier in pharmacotherapy for cocaine addiction.

    Joachim D. Uys;Ryan T. LaLumiere

  • Amygdala-hippocampal interactions in synaptic plasticity and memory formation.

    Rafael Roesler;Marise B. Parent;Ryan T. LaLumiere;Christa K. McIntyre

  • Basolateral amygdala projections to ventral hippocampus modulate the consolidation of footshock, but not contextual, learning in rats

    Mary L. Huff;Eric B. Emmons;Nandakumar S. Narayanan;Ryan T. LaLumiere

  • Emotional Modulation of Learning and Memory: Pharmacological Implications.

    Ryan T. LaLumiere;James L. McGaugh;Christa K. McIntyre

  • Memory enhancement induced by post-training intrabasolateral amygdala infusions of β-adrenergic or muscarinic agonists requires activation of dopamine receptors: Involvement of right, but not left, basolateral amygdala

    Ryan T. LaLumiere;James L. McGaugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter W. Kalivas
Peter W. Kalivas Medical University of South Carolina
James L. McGaugh
James L. McGaugh University of California, Irvine
Nandakumar S. Narayanan
Nandakumar S. Narayanan University of Iowa
John A. Wemmie
John A. Wemmie University of Iowa
Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University
John H. Freeman
John H. Freeman University of Iowa
Matthias Klugmann
Matthias Klugmann University of New South Wales
Julie A. Blendy
Julie A. Blendy University of Pennsylvania
Rafael Roesler
Rafael Roesler Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni
Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni National Autonomous University of Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience but want a flexible or alternative route, there are several accelerated bachelor’s degree programs available online. These allow you to complete your studies faster and jump-start your career sooner. Choosing an accelerated path can be especially beneficial for those with prior college credits or professionals looking to switch fields efficiently.

When considering your future, it’s also important to explore degrees that pay well as well as academic pathways that are recognized as the most lucrative degrees. These fields often intersect with neuroscience—such as bioengineering, computer science, or health-related majors—offering both intellectual fulfillment and strong salary potential.

If affordability is a key concern, many of the best online colleges that accept fafsa provide cost-effective neuroscience-related programs and financial aid options. Carefully reviewing degree type, earning prospects, and school cost can help guide you to the best choice for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ryan T. LaLumiere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles