World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4128
World Ranking
11826
National Ranking
17

Marko Munih publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Munih sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marko Munih D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Munih sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marko Munih is affiliated with the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia, focusing on engineering research with particular emphasis on control and systems engineering, biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, mechanical engineering, and plant science. Their research contributions span multiple subfields within engineering, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach.

Munih's main topics of research cover a diverse array of applied and theoretical domains, including:

  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Smart Agriculture and AI

The scientist has published prolifically in venues such as:

  • Sensors
  • Applied Sciences
  • 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR)
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
  • IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Among recent publications are:

  • "Pressure-Sensitive Insoles for Real-Time Gait-Related Applications" (2020) in Sensors
  • "Anchor Calibration for Real-Time-Measurement Localization Systems" (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
  • "Robotic Device for Out-of-Clinic Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation" (2022) in Applied Sciences
  • "A Classification Approach Based on Directed Acyclic Graph to Predict Locomotion Activities With One Inertial Sensor on the Thigh" (2021) in IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
  • "Distance Measurements in UWB-Radio Localization Systems Corrected with a Feedforward Neural Network Model" (2021) in Sensors

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Munih's research activity, having frequently coauthored with Matjaž Mihelj, Sebastjan Šlajpah, Janez Podobnik, Peter Krapež, and Aljaž Baumkircher.

Best Publications

  • A survey of methods for data fusion and system adaptation using autonomic nervous system responses in physiological computing

    Domen Novak;Matja Mihelj;Marko Munih

  • Upper limb motion analysis using haptic interface

    A. Bardorfer;M. Munih;A. Zupan;A. Primozic

  • Online Phase Detection Using Wearable Sensors for Walking with a Robotic Prosthesis

    Maja Goršič;Roman Kamnik;Luka Ambrožič;Nicola Vitiello

  • Automated detection of gait initiation and termination using wearable sensors

    Domen Novak;Peter Reberšek;Stefano Marco Maria De Rossi;Marco Donati

  • Three-Axial Accelerometer Calibration Using Kalman Filter Covariance Matrix for Online Estimation of Optimal Sensor Orientation

    T. Beravs;J. Podobnik;M. Munih

  • Virtual rehabilitation environment using principles of intrinsic motivation and game design

    Matjaž Mihelj;Domen Novak;Maja Milavec;Jaka Ziherl

  • Psychophysiological Responses to Robotic Rehabilitation Tasks in Stroke

    D Novak;J Ziherl;A Olenšek;M Milavec

  • Feedback control of unsupported standing in paraplegia. I. Optimal control approach

    K.J. Hunt;M. Munih;N. de N. Donaldson

  • Psychophysiological Measurements in a Biocooperative Feedback Loop for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation

    Domen Novak;Matjaž Mihelj;Jaka Ziherl;Andrej Olensek

  • A Flexible Sensor Technology for the Distributed Measurement of Interaction Pressure

    Marco Donati;Nicola Vitiello;Stefano Marco Maria De Rossi;Tommaso Lenzi

  • HIFE-haptic interface for finger exercise

    U. Mali;M. Munih

  • Model based inertial sensing of human body motion kinematics in sit-to-stand movement

    Josip Musić;Roman Kamnik;Marko Munih

  • CYBERLEGs: A user-oriented robotic transfemoral prosthesis with whole-body awareness control

    Luka Ambrozic;Maja Gorsic;Joost Geeroms;Louis L. Flynn

  • Kinematics based sensory fusion for wearable motion assessment in human walking

    S. Šlajpah;R. Kamnik;M. Munih

  • Psychophysiological responses to different levels of cognitive and physical workload in haptic interaction

    Domen Novak;Matjaž Mihelj;Marko Munih

  • Pressure-Sensitive Insoles for Real-Time Gait-Related Applications.

    Elena Martini;Tommaso Fiumalbi;Filippo Dell'Agnello;Zoran Ivanić

  • Implantable telemeter for long-term electroneurographic recordings in animals and humans.

    N. de N. Donaldson;L. Zhou;T. A. Perkins;M. Munih

  • Real-Time Hybrid Locomotion Mode Recognition for Lower Limb Wearable Robots

    Andrea Parri;Kebin Yuan;Dario Marconi;Tingfang Yan

  • Toward Real-Time Automated Detection of Turns during Gait Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units

    Domen Novak;Maja Goršič;Janez Podobnik;Marko Munih

  • Using Inertial Measurement Units and Electromyography to Quantify Movement during Action Research Arm Test Execution.

    Eva Repnik;Urška Puh;Nika Goljar;Marko Munih

  • Rehabilitation robotics

    Marko Munih;Tadej Bajd

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Vitiello
Nicola Vitiello Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Paolo Dario
Paolo Dario Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Eugenio Guglielmelli
Eugenio Guglielmelli Università Campus Bio-Medico
Robert Riener
Robert Riener ETH Zurich
Maria Chiara Carrozza
Maria Chiara Carrozza Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Dirk Lefeber
Dirk Lefeber Radboud University
Giovanni Cioni
Giovanni Cioni University of Pisa
Long Wang
Long Wang Peking University
Ales Ude
Ales Ude Jožef Stefan Institute
Cecilia Laschi
Cecilia Laschi National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often opens doors to a range of related online degrees and professional opportunities. Prospective students can benefit from reviewing affordable study options in science, technology, engineering, and math fields.

For those interested in a strong science foundation, the cheapest online physics degree programs provide an excellent starting point at a manageable cost. If data and analytics are more your interest area, you may want to find out what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to keep education affordable while gaining in-demand skills.

For engineering-minded students, take a look at the top online electrical engineering schools that offer flexible learning and robust programs. And don’t forget, many tech-related fields reward quick upskilling—explore certifications for jobs that can boost your qualifications and earning potential in less time.

These related online programs and certifications can complement your Computer Science studies, expand your career options, and help you stay competitive in the rapidly changing tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Marko Munih

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles