World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 38 7969 7683 292 288 214 6856

Loredana Zollo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Loredana Zollo between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Loredana Zollo published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2025. 63 of the 286 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2025. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 37 publications
2001 2025

286 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Loredana Zollo: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 6
2003 3
2004 2
2005 6
2006 3
2007 3
2008 7
2009 5
2010 5
2011 10
2012 7
2013 13
2014 12
2015 8
2016 13
2017 18
2018 12
2019 10
2020 16
2021 13
2022 19
2023 30
2024 26
2025 37
Total 286
Download as CSV

Loredana Zollo publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Loredana Zollo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 214 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317 214
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Loredana Zollo D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Loredana Zollo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350 38
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Loredana Zollo is affiliated with Università Campus Bio-Medico in Italy. Their research spans multiple fields including Engineering, Medicine, and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Rehabilitation. The scientist's work also intersects with Control and Systems Engineering.

Their main research topics cover areas such as muscle activation and electromyography studies, neuroscience and neural engineering, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, prosthetics and rehabilitation robotics, robot manipulation and learning, as well as advanced sensor and energy harvesting materials.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Loredana Zollo include:

  • Methods and Sensors for Slip Detection in Robotics: A Survey (2020, IEEE Access)
  • Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Exoskeletons in Clinical Neurorehabilitation: Ready or Not? (2022, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair)
  • Affordable Robotics for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review (2021, IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics)
  • Restoring Activities of Daily Living Using an EEG/EOG-Controlled Semiautonomous and Mobile Whole-Arm Exoskeleton in Chronic Stroke (2020, IEEE Systems Journal)
  • Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries and Pain Among Healthcare Professionals. A Comprehensive Systematic Review of the Literature (2022, Journal of Safety Research)

Frequent coauthors of Loredana Zollo include Francesca Cordella, Christian Tamantini, Francesco Scotto di Luzio, Clemente Lauretti, and Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte.

The scientist often publishes in the following venues:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Sensors
  • IEEE Access
  • Applied Sciences
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users.

    Francesca Cordella;Anna Lisa Ciancio;Rinaldo Sacchetti;Angelo Davalli

  • Biomechatronic Design and Control of an Anthropomorphic Artificial Hand for Prosthetic and Robotic Applications

    L. Zollo;S. Roccella;E. Guglielmelli;M.C. Carrozza

  • Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans

    Calogero M. Oddo;Stanisa Raspopovic;Stanisa Raspopovic;Fiorenzo Artoni;Fiorenzo Artoni;Alberto Mazzoni

  • PD control with on-line gravity compensation for robots with elastic joints: Theory and experiments

    Alessandro De Luca;Bruno Siciliano;Loredana Zollo

  • Restoring Tactile sensations via neural interfaces for real-time force-and-slippage closed-loop control of bionic hands.

    Loredana Zollo;Giovanni Di Pino;Anna L. Ciancio;Federico Ranieri

  • Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation

    Loredana Zollo;Luca Rossini;Marco Bravi;Giovanni Magrone

  • Control of Prosthetic Hands via the Peripheral Nervous System.

    Anna Lisa Ciancio;Francesca Cordella;Roberto Barone;Rocco Antonio Romeo

  • Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke

    Fioravante Capone;Sandra Miccinilli;Giovanni Pellegrino;Loredana Zollo

  • The passive stiffness of the wrist and forearm

    Domenico Formica;Steven K. Charles;Loredana Zollo;Eugenio Guglielmelli

  • Inter-hemispheric coupling changes associate with motor improvements after robotic stroke rehabilitation

    G. Pellegrino;L. Tomasevic;M. Tombini;G. Assenza

  • Compliance control for an anthropomorphic robot with elastic joints: Theory and experiments

    Loredana Zollo;Bruno Siciliano;Alessandro De Luca;Eugenio Guglielmelli

  • NLR, MLP, SVM, and LDA: a comparative analysis on EMG data from people with trans-radial amputation

    Alberto Dellacasa Bellingegni;Emanuele Gruppioni;Giorgio Colazzo;Angelo Davalli

  • Microfabricated tactile sensors for biomedical applications: a review.

    Paola Saccomandi;Emiliano Schena;Calogero Maria Oddo;Loredana Zollo

  • Invasive Intraneural Interfaces: Foreign Body Reaction Issues.

    Fiorenza Lotti;Federico Ranieri;Gianluca Vadalà;Loredana Zollo

  • Augmentation-related brain plasticity

    Giovanni Di Pino;Angelo Maravita;Loredana Zollo;Eugenio Guglielmelli

  • Methods and Sensors for Slip Detection in Robotics: A Survey

    Rocco Antonio Romeo;Loredana Zollo

  • Learning by Demonstration for Planning Activities of Daily Living in Rehabilitation and Assistive Robotics

    Clemente Lauretti;Francesca Cordella;Eugenio Guglielmelli;Loredana Zollo

  • Brain activity preceding a 2D manual catching task

    Mario Tombini;Filippo Zappasodi;Loredana Zollo;Giovanni Pellegrino

  • Design and Characterization of a Novel High-Power Series Elastic Actuator for a Lower Limb Robotic Orthosis

    Dino Accoto;Giorgio Carpino;Fabrizio Sergi;Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte

  • Feasibility and safety of shared EEG/EOG and vision-guided autonomous whole-arm exoskeleton control to perform activities of daily living.

    Simona Crea;Marius Nann;Emilio Trigili;Francesca Cordella

  • An experimental study on compliance control for a redundant personal robot arm

    Loredana Zollo;Bruno Siciliano;Cecilia Laschi;Giancarlo Teti

  • Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.

    L Zollo;E Gallotta;E Guglielmelli;S Sterzi

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugenio Guglielmelli
Eugenio Guglielmelli Università Campus Bio-Medico
Bruno Siciliano
Bruno Siciliano University of Naples Federico II
Paolo Dario
Paolo Dario Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Cecilia Laschi
Cecilia Laschi National University of Singapore
Giovanni Pellegrino
Giovanni Pellegrino McGill University
Federico Ranieri
Federico Ranieri University of Verona
Emiliano Schena
Emiliano Schena Università Campus Bio-Medico
Maria Chiara Carrozza
Maria Chiara Carrozza Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Silvestro Micera
Silvestro Micera Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Nicola Vitiello
Nicola Vitiello Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology are versatile fields that intersect with many career paths. If you’re considering expanding your expertise or exploring alternative roles in the U.S., online degrees offer flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in law and technology, check out the best online aba-approved paralegal programs to gain valuable legal skills applicable to tech industries. If you’re aiming for leadership roles in people management, a master degree in human resources can boost your ability to navigate workplace dynamics within engineering firms.

Communication is vital in every technical field. Earning an affordable online master's degree in communications helps engineers and technologists effectively share ideas and lead teams. For entrepreneurial-minded students, an mba in entrepreneurship can provide the skills to launch startups or innovate within established organizations.

Exploring these related pathways can enrich your career options and set you apart in the competitive U.S. job market.

Best Scientists Citing Loredana Zollo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles