World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
72
Citations
14310
World Ranking
1527
National Ranking
647

David J. Tanner publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Tanner sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David J. Tanner D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Tanner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Tanner is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric chemistry, environmental science, and related subfields.

The main fields of study in which Tanner has contributed include:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Their work spans several specialized subfields, notably:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Their research topics cover a range of atmospheric and environmental issues, including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

David J. Tanner has a strong publication record with multiple recent papers. Representative works include:

  • "Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes," 2021, Science Advances
  • "Large contribution of biomass burning emissions to ozone throughout the global remote troposphere," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Observation-based modeling of ozone chemistry in the Seoul metropolitan area during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ)," 2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • "A vacuum ultraviolet ion source (VUV-IS) for iodide-chemical ionization mass spectrometry: a substitute for radioactive ion sources," 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • "Low-Molecular-Weight Carboxylic Acids in the Southeastern U.S.: Formation, Partitioning, and Implications for Organic Aerosol Aging," 2021, Environmental Science & Technology

Their frequent coauthors demonstrate ongoing collaborative efforts in atmospheric research. Notable collaborators include:

  • L. G. Huey
  • Glenn S. Diskin
  • Young Ro Lee
  • P. O. Wennberg
  • Joshua P. DiGangi

Tanner regularly publishes in key scientific venues such as:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Atmospheric Environment

Best Publications

  • Measurements of new particle formation and ultrafine particle growth rates at a clean continental site

    R. J. Weber;R. J. Weber;J. J. Marti;J. J. Marti;P. H. McMurry;F. L. Eisele;F. L. Eisele

  • Measurement of the gas phase concentration of H2SO4 and methane sulfonic acid and estimates of H2SO4 production and loss in the atmosphere

    Unknown

  • MEASURED ATMOSPHERIC NEW PARTICLE FORMATION RATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEATION MECHANISMS

    R. J. Weber;J. J. Marti;P. H. McMURRY;F. L. Eisele

  • New Particle Formation in the Remote Troposphere: A Comparison of Observations at Various Sites

    R. J. Weber;P. H. McMurry;R. L. Mauldin;D. J. Tanner

  • Particle production in the remote marine atmosphere: Cloud outflow and subsidence during ACE 1

    A. D. Clarke;J. L. Varner;F. Eisele;R. L. Mauldin

  • Measurement of Expected Nucleation Precursor Species and 3–500-nm Diameter Particles at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii

    R. J. Weber;P. H. McMurry;F. L. Eisele;D. J. Tanner

  • Particle nucleation in the tropical boundary layer and its coupling to marine sulfur sources

    A. D. Clarke;D. Davis;V. N. Kapustin;F. Eisele

  • A thermal dissociation–chemical ionization mass spectrometry (TD‐CIMS) technique for the simultaneous measurement of peroxyacyl nitrates and dinitrogen pentoxide

    Darlene L. Slusher;Darlene L. Slusher;L. Gregory Huey;David J. Tanner;Frank M. Flocke

  • Ion-assisted tropospheric OH measurements

    F. L. Eisele;D. J. Tanner

  • Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications

    Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;L. Gregory Huey;Robert J. Yokelson;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Photochemical production of molecular bromine in Arctic surface snowpacks

    Kerri A. Pratt;Kyle D. Custard;Paul B. Shepson;Thomas A. Douglas

  • A study of new particle formation and growth involving biogenic and trace gas species measured during ACE 1

    Rodney J. Weber;Peter H. McMurry;Lee Mauldin;David J. Tanner

  • A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere

    P. H. McMurry;M. Fink;H. Sakurai;M. R. Stolzenburg

  • Unexpected high levels of NO observed at South Pole

    D. Davis;J. B. Nowak;G. Chen;M. Buhr

  • Sesquiterpene emissions from pine trees--identifications, emission rates and flux estimates for the contiguous United States.

    Detlev Helmig;John Ortega;Tiffany Duhl;David Tanner

  • Selected ion chemical ionization mass spectrometric measurement of OH

    D. J. Tanner;A. Jefferson;F. L. Eisele

  • DMS oxidation in the Antarctic marine boundary layer: Comparison of model simulations and held observations of DMS, DMSO, DMSO2, H2SO4(g), MSA(g), and MSA(p)

    D. Davis;G. Chen;P. Kasibhatla;A. Jefferson

  • Atmospheric sulfur chemistry and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations over the northeastern Pacific Coast

    H. Berresheim;F. L. Eisele;D. J. Tanner;L. M. McInnes

  • Measurements of dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethyl sulfone, and aerosol ions at Palmer Station, Antarctica

    H. Berresheim;J. W. Huey;R. P. Thorn;F. L. Eisele

  • Photochemical modeling of hydroxyl and its relationship to other species during the Tropospheric OH Photochemistry Experiment

    S. A. McKeen;G. Mount;F. Eisele;E. Williams

  • Nucleation in the equatorial free troposphere: Favorable environments during PEM‐Tropics

    A. D. Clarke;F. Eisele;V. N. Kapustin;K. Moore

  • ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols

    S.C. Wofsy;S. Afshar;H.M. Allen;E.C. Apel

Frequent Co-Authors

L. G. Huey
L. G. Huey Georgia Institute of Technology
John B. Nowak
John B. Nowak Langley Research Center
Roy L. Mauldin
Roy L. Mauldin University of Colorado Boulder
Fred L. Eisele
Fred L. Eisele Georgia Institute of Technology
Douglas D. Davis
Douglas D. Davis Georgia Institute of Technology
Barry Lefer
Barry Lefer National Aeronautics and Space Administration
J. A. Neuman
J. A. Neuman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Rodney J. Weber
Rodney J. Weber Georgia Institute of Technology
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine
Jack E. Dibb
Jack E. Dibb University of New Hampshire

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For students interested in technology and mapping, pursuing one of the best gis graduate programs can enhance spatial analysis skills crucial for environmental research and resource management.

For those aiming to combine leadership with environmental policy, a 1 year mpa online program offers a fast-track route into public administration and sustainable governance roles.

Understanding social dynamics around environmental issues is key, making an online sociology degree bachelors an excellent option for students focusing on community impact and social behavior in environmental contexts.

Moreover, professionals aiming to advance in education and training related to environmental topics may consider online edd programs no dissertation, which provide advanced credentials without the lengthy dissertation process.

These diverse online degrees complement Environmental Sciences by broadening career possibilities in research, policy, education, and applied technology.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Tanner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles