World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
74
Citations
14321
World Ranking
1371
National Ranking
586

Fred L. Eisele publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred L. Eisele sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Fred L. Eisele D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred L. Eisele sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred L. Eisele is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their academic and research work is connected with this institution, reflecting involvement in its scientific community and research environment.

While there is no available data on published papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues related to Fred L. Eisele, the affiliation indicates a base for contributions in higher education and research.

No specific information on fields of study, subfields, or particular research topics is provided for Fred L. Eisele. There are also no records of book publications or awards linked to this scientist.

The profile maintains an objective perspective based solely on the available data, and no assumptions are made beyond recorded facts.

Best Publications

  • Measurements of new particle formation and ultrafine particle growth rates at a clean continental site

    R. J. Weber;R. J. Weber;J. J. Marti;J. J. Marti;P. H. McMurry;F. L. Eisele;F. L. Eisele

  • Measurement of the gas phase concentration of H2SO4 and methane sulfonic acid and estimates of H2SO4 production and loss in the atmosphere

    Unknown

  • MEASURED ATMOSPHERIC NEW PARTICLE FORMATION RATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEATION MECHANISMS

    R. J. Weber;J. J. Marti;P. H. McMURRY;F. L. Eisele

  • Dependence of nucleation rates on sulfuric acid vapor concentration in diverse atmospheric locations

    C. Kuang;P. H. McMurry;A. V. McCormick;F. L. Eisele

  • Laboratory studies of particle nucleation: Initial results for H2SO4, H2O, and NH3 vapors

    S. M. Ball;S. M. Ball;D. R. Hanson;F. L. Eisele;F. L. Eisele;Peter H McMurry

  • Particle production in the remote marine atmosphere: Cloud outflow and subsidence during ACE 1

    A. D. Clarke;J. L. Varner;F. Eisele;R. L. Mauldin

  • Measurement of Expected Nucleation Precursor Species and 3–500-nm Diameter Particles at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii

    R. J. Weber;P. H. McMurry;F. L. Eisele;D. J. Tanner

  • Ion-assisted tropospheric OH measurements

    F. L. Eisele;D. J. Tanner

  • A study of new particle formation and growth involving biogenic and trace gas species measured during ACE 1

    Rodney J. Weber;Peter H. McMurry;Lee Mauldin;David J. Tanner

  • A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere

    P. H. McMurry;M. Fink;H. Sakurai;M. R. Stolzenburg

  • Testing fast photochemical theory during TRACE‐P based on measurements of OH, HO2, and CH2O

    Jennifer R. Olson;J. H. Crawford;G. Chen;A. Fried

  • Acid–base chemical reaction model for nucleation rates in the polluted atmospheric boundary layer

    Modi Chen;Mari Titcombe;Mari Titcombe;Jingkun Jiang;Coty Jen

  • Unexpected high levels of NO observed at South Pole

    D. Davis;J. B. Nowak;G. Chen;M. Buhr

  • Export efficiency of black carbon aerosol in continental outflow: Global implications

    Rokjin J. Park;Daniel J. Jacob;Paul I. Palmer;Antony D. Clarke

  • Selected ion chemical ionization mass spectrometric measurement of OH

    D. J. Tanner;A. Jefferson;F. L. Eisele

  • DMS oxidation in the Antarctic marine boundary layer: Comparison of model simulations and held observations of DMS, DMSO, DMSO2, H2SO4(g), MSA(g), and MSA(p)

    D. Davis;G. Chen;P. Kasibhatla;A. Jefferson

  • Atmospheric sulfur chemistry and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations over the northeastern Pacific Coast

    H. Berresheim;F. L. Eisele;D. J. Tanner;L. M. McInnes

  • Measurements of dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethyl sulfone, and aerosol ions at Palmer Station, Antarctica

    H. Berresheim;J. W. Huey;R. P. Thorn;F. L. Eisele

  • Diffusion of H2SO4 in Humidified Nitrogen: Hydrated H2SO4

    D. R. Hanson;F. Eisele

  • Thermal Desorption Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer for Ultrafine Particle Chemical Composition

    Didier Voisin;J. N. Smith;H. Sakurai;P. H. McMurry

  • Photochemical modeling of hydroxyl and its relationship to other species during the Tropospheric OH Photochemistry Experiment

    S. A. McKeen;G. Mount;F. Eisele;E. Williams

  • Nucleation in the equatorial free troposphere: Favorable environments during PEM‐Tropics

    A. D. Clarke;F. Eisele;V. N. Kapustin;K. Moore

  • Growth rates of freshly nucleated atmospheric particles in Atlanta : Topical collection: New particle formation and growth in Atlanta

    Mark R. Stolzenburg;Peter H. Mcmurry;Hiromu Sakurai;James N. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Tanner
David J. Tanner Georgia Institute of Technology
Christopher A. Cantrell
Christopher A. Cantrell University of Colorado Boulder
Richard E. Shetter
Richard E. Shetter National Center for Atmospheric Research
Peter H. McMurry
Peter H. McMurry University of Minnesota
Douglas D. Davis
Douglas D. Davis Georgia Institute of Technology
Roy L. Mauldin
Roy L. Mauldin University of Colorado Boulder
Donald R. Blake
Donald R. Blake University of California, Irvine
Mark A. Zondlo
Mark A. Zondlo Princeton University
Donald C. Thornton
Donald C. Thornton Drexel University
Alan R. Bandy
Alan R. Bandy Drexel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with related fields. For those considering a more accessible entry point, reviewing the easiest bachelor degree options can provide insights into programs that balance quality education with manageable workloads. This can be especially beneficial for students seeking flexibility in their studies.

Specialized degrees like online geology degrees offer students a focused understanding of Earth systems, complementing environmental science knowledge. These programs enhance skills in fieldwork and analysis, which are critical for careers in conservation, natural resource management, and climate science.

Geospatial technologies play a crucial role in environmental research and planning. Pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs can equip students with advanced tools for mapping and spatial analysis, empowering them to make data-driven decisions in environmental policy and management.

For professionals aiming to influence environmental policy and administration, a one year MPA offers an accelerated pathway to public administration skills. This degree supports leadership roles in government and nonprofit organizations, where they can impact sustainable development and environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Fred L. Eisele