World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
104
Citations
38006
World Ranking
293
National Ranking
133

Chemistry

D-Index
99
Citations
34351
World Ranking
1345
National Ranking
515

Peter H. McMurry publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. McMurry sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 296 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter H. McMurry D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. McMurry sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter H. McMurry is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their academic career includes recognition through prestigious awards, highlighting contributions to the scientific community.

Among notable distinctions, Peter H. McMurry was named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2007. They also received the honor of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1998.

There is no publicly available data concerning McMurry's specific recent publications, frequent co-authors, or preferred publication venues. Similarly, detailed information about fields of study, subfields, major research topics, or book publications is not present in the data provided.

Given the available information, McMurry's academic profile reflects a scientist recognized by major organizations, holding an active position at a well-established research university in the United States.

Best Publications

  • Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations

    M Kulmala;Hanna Tuula Katariina Vehkamäki;Tuukka Petäjä;M Dal Maso

  • A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements

    Peter H McMurry

  • Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions

    A. Wiedensohler;W. Birmili;A. Nowak;A. Sonntag

  • Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing

    Renyi Zhang;Alexei F. Khalizov;Joakim Pagels;Dan Zhang

  • Nanoparticles and the Environment

    Pratim Biswas;Chang-Yu Wu

  • Organics alter hygroscopic behavior of atmospheric particles

    Pradeep Saxena;Lynn M. Hildemann;Peter H. McMurry;John H. Seinfeld

  • Generating Particle Beams of Controlled Dimensions and Divergence: I. Theory of Particle Motion in Aerodynamic Lenses and Nozzle Expansions

    Peng Liu;Paul J. Ziemann;David B. Kittelson;Peter H. McMurry

  • Generating Particle Beams of Controlled Dimensions and Divergence: II. Experimental Evaluation of Particle Motion in Aerodynamic Lenses and Nozzle Expansions

    Peng Liu;Paul J. Ziemann;David B. Kittelson;Peter H. McMurry

  • Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles

    Kihong Park;Feng Cao;David B Kittelson;Peter H McMurry

  • Application of the tandem differential mobility analyzer to studies of droplet growth or evaporation

    D.J. Rader;P.H. McMurry

  • Measurements of new particle formation and ultrafine particle growth rates at a clean continental site

    R. J. Weber;R. J. Weber;J. J. Marti;J. J. Marti;P. H. McMurry;F. L. Eisele;F. L. Eisele

  • Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments—a review

    Erik Swietlicki;H-C Hansson;K Hameri;Birgitta Svenningsson

  • An Ultrafine Aerosol Condensation Nucleus Counter

    Mark R. Stolzenburg;Peter H. McMurry

  • The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density

    Peter H. McMurry;Xin Wang;Kihong Park;Kensei Ehara

  • Observations of aminium salts in atmospheric nanoparticles and possible climatic implications

    James N. Smith;Kelley C. Barsanti;Hans R. Friedli;Mikael Ehn

  • MEASURED ATMOSPHERIC NEW PARTICLE FORMATION RATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEATION MECHANISMS

    R. J. Weber;J. J. Marti;P. H. McMURRY;F. L. Eisele

  • On-line measurements of diesel nanoparticle composition and volatility

    Hiromu Sakurai;Herbert J. Tobias;Kihong Park;Darrick Zarling

  • Structural Properties of Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility

    Kihong Park;David B. Kittelson;Peter H. McMurry

  • Dependence of nucleation rates on sulfuric acid vapor concentration in diverse atmospheric locations

    C. Kuang;P. H. McMurry;A. V. McCormick;F. L. Eisele

  • Chemical analysis of diesel engine nanoparticles using a nano-DMA/thermal desorption particle beam mass spectrometer.

    Herbert J. Tobias;Derek E. Beving;Paul J. Ziemann;Hiromu Sakurai

Frequent Co-Authors

James N. Smith
James N. Smith University of California, Irvine
David B. Kittelson
David B. Kittelson University of Minnesota
Rodney J. Weber
Rodney J. Weber Georgia Institute of Technology
Fred L. Eisele
Fred L. Eisele Georgia Institute of Technology
Paul J. Ziemann
Paul J. Ziemann University of Colorado Boulder
Xiaoliang Wang
Xiaoliang Wang Desert Research Institute
William W Gerberich
William W Gerberich University of Minnesota
David J. Tanner
David J. Tanner Georgia Institute of Technology
Joakim Pagels
Joakim Pagels Lund University
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that address critical environmental challenges. Many students opt to complement their education with specialized online degrees that enhance technical and leadership skills.

For those interested in spatial data analysis and environmental mapping, exploring the top GIS masters programs can provide advanced expertise in Geographic Information Systems. This skillset is increasingly vital for environmental monitoring and resource management careers.

Leadership roles in environmental policy and public administration are also common career pathways. Accelerated options like 1 year MPA programs offer a streamlined path to gaining public affairs knowledge essential for managing environmental initiatives and regulations.

Additionally, an understanding of societal influences on environmental issues is critical. Pursuing online sociology bachelor programs helps students study social dynamics and human behavior, valuable for community-focused environmental work.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise without lengthy research commitments, EdD programs without dissertation requirements provide flexible doctoral-level education, enabling career growth in education, policy, or environmental leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Peter H. McMurry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles