World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joakim Pagels

Joakim Pagels

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7547
World Ranking
6732
National Ranking
125

Joakim Pagels publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joakim Pagels sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 326 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Joakim Pagels D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joakim Pagels sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joakim Pagels is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and focuses their research on Environmental Science and Engineering. Their main fields of study include Environmental Science with 47 publications and Engineering with 33 publications, reflecting a strong interdisciplinary approach.

The subfields of study in which Pagels is active cover a range of topics related to the environment and technology. These include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (28 publications), Automotive Engineering (17 publications), Atmospheric Science (10 publications), Environmental Engineering (9 publications), and Pollution (7 publications).

Pagels' work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
  • Tribology and Wear Analysis

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pagels include Vilhelm Malmborg, Louise Gren, Martin Tunér, Axel Eriksson, and Ulla Vogel, indicating a broad network of research partnerships.

Pagels has contributed multiple papers across well-regarded scientific venues. Frequent publication venues with three publications each include Wear, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Atmosphere, Indoor Air, and Toxicology Letters.

Representative recent papers include:

  • Particle characterization and toxicity in C57BL/6 mice following instillation of five different diesel exhaust particles designed to differ in physicochemical properties, 2020, Particle and Fibre Toxicology
  • Effects of renewable fuel and exhaust aftertreatment on primary and secondary emissions from a modern heavy-duty diesel engine, 2021, Journal of Aerosol Science
  • Emissions and exposures of graphene nanomaterials, titanium dioxide nanofibers, and nanoparticles during down-stream industrial handling, 2020, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
  • Ice-nucleating ability of particulate emissions from solid-biomass-fired cookstoves: an experimental study, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Effect of Renewable Fuels and Intake O2 Concentration on Diesel Engine Emission Characteristics and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Formation, 2020, Atmosphere

Best Publications

  • Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing

    Renyi Zhang;Alexei F. Khalizov;Joakim Pagels;Dan Zhang

  • Health effects of residential wood smoke particles: the importance of combustion conditions and physicochemical particle properties

    Anette Kocbach Bølling;Joakim Pagels;Karl Espen Yttri;Lars Barregard

  • Saturation Vapor Pressures and Transition Enthalpies of Low-Volatility Organic Molecules of Atmospheric Relevance: From Dicarboxylic Acids to Complex Mixtures

    Merete Bilde;Kelley Barsanti;Murray Booth;Christopher D Cappa

  • Size-Resolved Respiratory-Tract Deposition of Fine and Ultrafine Hydrophobic and Hygroscopic Aerosol Particles During Rest and Exercise

    Jakob Löndahl;Andreas Massling;Joakim Pagels;Erik Swietlicki

  • Processing of Soot by Controlled Sulphuric Acid and Water Condensation—Mass and Mobility Relationship

    Joakim Pagels;Joakim Pagels;Alexei F. Khalizov;Peter H. McMurry;Renyi Y. Zhang

  • Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor

    Alexei F. Khalizov;Renyi Zhang;Dan Zhang;Huaxin Xue

  • Experimental determination of deposition of diesel exhaust particles in the human respiratory tract

    Jenny Rissler;Erik Swietlicki;Agneta Bengtsson;Christoffer Boman

  • Impacts of Combustion Conditions and Photochemical Processing on the Light Absorption of Biomass Combustion Aerosol

    J Martinsson;A C Eriksson;I Elbaek Nielsen;Berg Malmborg

  • A set-up for field studies of respiratory tract deposition of fine and ultrafine particles in humans

    Jakob Löndahl;Joakim Pagels;Erik Swietlicki;Jingchuan Zhou

  • Secondary organic aerosol formation from idling gasoline passenger vehicle emissions investigated in a smog chamber

    Erik Nordin;Axel Eriksson;Pontus Roldin;Patrik Nilsson

  • Measurement Techniques for Respiratory Tract Deposition of Airborne Nanoparticles: A Critical Review

    Jakob Löndahl;Winfried Möller;Joakim H. Pagels;Wolfgang G. Kreyling

  • Chemical composition and mass emission factors of candle smoke particles

    Joakim Pagels;Aneta Wierzbicka;Erik Nilsson;Christina Isaxon

  • Effective Density Characterization of Soot Agglomerates from Various Sources and Comparison to Aggregation Theory

    Jenny Rissler;Maria E. Messing;Azhar I. Malik;Patrik T. Nilsson

  • Effective Density and Mixing State of Aerosol Particles in a Near-Traffic Urban Environment

    Jenny Rissler;Erik Z Nordin;Axel C Eriksson;Patrik T Nilsson

  • Fly ash penetration through electrostatic precipitator and flue gas condenser in a 6 MW biomass fired boiler

    M. Strand;J. Pagels;A. Szpila;A. Gudmundsson

  • Modelling non-equilibrium secondary organic aerosol formation and evaporation with the aerosol dynamics, gas- and particle-phase chemistry kinetic multilayer model ADCHAM

    P. Roldin;P. Roldin;A. C. Eriksson;E. Z. Nordin;E. Hermansson

  • Particle emissions from district heating units operating on three commonly used biofuels

    Aneta Wierzbicka;L Lillieblad;Joakim Pagels;M Strand

  • Antioxidant airway responses following experimental exposure to wood smoke in man.

    Maria Sehlstedt;Rosamund Dove;Christoffer Boman;Joakim Pagels

  • Characteristics of aerosol particles formed during grate combustion of moist forest residue

    Joakim Pagels;Michael Strand;Jenny Rissler;Aneta Szpila

  • Experimentally Determined Human Respiratory Tract Deposition of Airborne Particles at a Busy Street

    Jakob Löndahl;Andreas Massling;Erik Swietlicki;Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner

  • Processing of Soot by Controlled Sulphuric Acid and Water Condensation – Mass and Mobility Relationship and Morphology

    Joakim Pagels;Alexei K. Khalizov;Mark Emery;Peter H. McMurry

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Swietlicki
Erik Swietlicki Lund University
Christoffer Boman
Christoffer Boman Umeå University
Birgitta Svenningsson
Birgitta Svenningsson Lund University
Knut Deppert
Knut Deppert Lund University
Andreas Massling
Andreas Massling Aarhus University
Anders Blomberg
Anders Blomberg University of Gothenburg
Steffen Loft
Steffen Loft University of Copenhagen
Martin Tuner
Martin Tuner Lund University
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki
Peter H. McMurry
Peter H. McMurry University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students complement their studies with social science perspectives, which is why considering a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions.

For professionals aiming to step into leadership or policy roles, advanced education options like an online EdD program become relevant. When searching for flexible options, an online edd no dissertation choice can be especially appealing, balancing rigorous coursework without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Choosing the right institution is critical, so reviewing accredited eds to edd programs ensures that your degree holds value and meets industry standards. For those interested in socially driven environmental work, pursuing an affordable doctorate is feasible by exploring the cheapest dsw program, combining social work expertise with environmental advocacy.

Overall, these related online degrees enhance knowledge and skills, increasing career flexibility in environmental policy, education, and community leadership fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joakim Pagels

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles