World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joakim Pagels

Joakim Pagels

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6734 6466 124 121 326 7547

Joakim Pagels publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joakim Pagels between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joakim Pagels published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 13 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2011. 17 of the 351 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2011. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
1999 2025

351 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joakim Pagels: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 8
2002 5
2003 12
2004 9
2005 15
2006 14
2007 11
2008 14
2009 22
2010 16
2011 36
2012 27
2013 21
2014 28
2015 22
2016 10
2017 15
2018 13
2019 5
2020 8
2021 11
2022 7
2023 2
2024 9
2025 8
Total 351
Download as CSV

Joakim Pagels publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joakim Pagels sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 326 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106 326
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Joakim Pagels D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joakim Pagels sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Joakim Pagels is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and focuses their research on Environmental Science and Engineering. Their main fields of study include Environmental Science with 47 publications and Engineering with 33 publications, reflecting a strong interdisciplinary approach.

The subfields of study in which Pagels is active cover a range of topics related to the environment and technology. These include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (28 publications), Automotive Engineering (17 publications), Atmospheric Science (10 publications), Environmental Engineering (9 publications), and Pollution (7 publications).

Pagels' work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
  • Tribology and Wear Analysis

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pagels include Vilhelm Malmborg, Louise Gren, Martin Tunér, Axel Eriksson, and Ulla Vogel, indicating a broad network of research partnerships.

Pagels has contributed multiple papers across well-regarded scientific venues. Frequent publication venues with three publications each include Wear, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Atmosphere, Indoor Air, and Toxicology Letters.

Representative recent papers include:

  • Particle characterization and toxicity in C57BL/6 mice following instillation of five different diesel exhaust particles designed to differ in physicochemical properties, 2020, Particle and Fibre Toxicology
  • Effects of renewable fuel and exhaust aftertreatment on primary and secondary emissions from a modern heavy-duty diesel engine, 2021, Journal of Aerosol Science
  • Emissions and exposures of graphene nanomaterials, titanium dioxide nanofibers, and nanoparticles during down-stream industrial handling, 2020, Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
  • Ice-nucleating ability of particulate emissions from solid-biomass-fired cookstoves: an experimental study, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Effect of Renewable Fuels and Intake O2 Concentration on Diesel Engine Emission Characteristics and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Formation, 2020, Atmosphere

Best Publications

  • Variability in morphology, hygroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing

    Renyi Zhang;Alexei F. Khalizov;Joakim Pagels;Dan Zhang

  • Health effects of residential wood smoke particles: the importance of combustion conditions and physicochemical particle properties

    Anette Kocbach Bølling;Joakim Pagels;Karl Espen Yttri;Lars Barregard

  • Saturation Vapor Pressures and Transition Enthalpies of Low-Volatility Organic Molecules of Atmospheric Relevance: From Dicarboxylic Acids to Complex Mixtures

    Merete Bilde;Kelley Barsanti;Murray Booth;Christopher D Cappa

  • Size-Resolved Respiratory-Tract Deposition of Fine and Ultrafine Hydrophobic and Hygroscopic Aerosol Particles During Rest and Exercise

    Jakob Löndahl;Andreas Massling;Joakim Pagels;Erik Swietlicki

  • Processing of Soot by Controlled Sulphuric Acid and Water Condensation—Mass and Mobility Relationship

    Joakim Pagels;Joakim Pagels;Alexei F. Khalizov;Peter H. McMurry;Renyi Y. Zhang

  • Formation of highly hygroscopic soot aerosols upon internal mixing with sulfuric acid vapor

    Alexei F. Khalizov;Renyi Zhang;Dan Zhang;Huaxin Xue

  • Experimental determination of deposition of diesel exhaust particles in the human respiratory tract

    Jenny Rissler;Erik Swietlicki;Agneta Bengtsson;Christoffer Boman

  • Impacts of Combustion Conditions and Photochemical Processing on the Light Absorption of Biomass Combustion Aerosol

    J Martinsson;A C Eriksson;I Elbaek Nielsen;Berg Malmborg

  • A set-up for field studies of respiratory tract deposition of fine and ultrafine particles in humans

    Jakob Löndahl;Joakim Pagels;Erik Swietlicki;Jingchuan Zhou

  • Secondary organic aerosol formation from idling gasoline passenger vehicle emissions investigated in a smog chamber

    Erik Nordin;Axel Eriksson;Pontus Roldin;Patrik Nilsson

  • Measurement Techniques for Respiratory Tract Deposition of Airborne Nanoparticles: A Critical Review

    Jakob Löndahl;Winfried Möller;Joakim H. Pagels;Wolfgang G. Kreyling

  • Chemical composition and mass emission factors of candle smoke particles

    Joakim Pagels;Aneta Wierzbicka;Erik Nilsson;Christina Isaxon

  • Effective Density Characterization of Soot Agglomerates from Various Sources and Comparison to Aggregation Theory

    Jenny Rissler;Maria E. Messing;Azhar I. Malik;Patrik T. Nilsson

  • Effective Density and Mixing State of Aerosol Particles in a Near-Traffic Urban Environment

    Jenny Rissler;Erik Z Nordin;Axel C Eriksson;Patrik T Nilsson

  • Fly ash penetration through electrostatic precipitator and flue gas condenser in a 6 MW biomass fired boiler

    M. Strand;J. Pagels;A. Szpila;A. Gudmundsson

  • Modelling non-equilibrium secondary organic aerosol formation and evaporation with the aerosol dynamics, gas- and particle-phase chemistry kinetic multilayer model ADCHAM

    P. Roldin;P. Roldin;A. C. Eriksson;E. Z. Nordin;E. Hermansson

  • Particle emissions from district heating units operating on three commonly used biofuels

    Aneta Wierzbicka;L Lillieblad;Joakim Pagels;M Strand

  • Antioxidant airway responses following experimental exposure to wood smoke in man.

    Maria Sehlstedt;Rosamund Dove;Christoffer Boman;Joakim Pagels

  • Characteristics of aerosol particles formed during grate combustion of moist forest residue

    Joakim Pagels;Michael Strand;Jenny Rissler;Aneta Szpila

  • Experimentally Determined Human Respiratory Tract Deposition of Airborne Particles at a Busy Street

    Jakob Löndahl;Andreas Massling;Erik Swietlicki;Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner

  • Processing of Soot by Controlled Sulphuric Acid and Water Condensation – Mass and Mobility Relationship and Morphology

    Joakim Pagels;Alexei K. Khalizov;Mark Emery;Peter H. McMurry

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik Swietlicki
Erik Swietlicki Lund University
Christoffer Boman
Christoffer Boman Umeå University
Birgitta Svenningsson
Birgitta Svenningsson Lund University
Knut Deppert
Knut Deppert Lund University
Andreas Massling
Andreas Massling Aarhus University
Anders Blomberg
Anders Blomberg University of Gothenburg
Steffen Loft
Steffen Loft University of Copenhagen
Martin Tuner
Martin Tuner Lund University
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki
Peter H. McMurry
Peter H. McMurry University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students complement their studies with social science perspectives, which is why considering a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions.

For professionals aiming to step into leadership or policy roles, advanced education options like an online EdD program become relevant. When searching for flexible options, an online edd no dissertation choice can be especially appealing, balancing rigorous coursework without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Choosing the right institution is critical, so reviewing accredited eds to edd programs ensures that your degree holds value and meets industry standards. For those interested in socially driven environmental work, pursuing an affordable doctorate is feasible by exploring the cheapest dsw program, combining social work expertise with environmental advocacy.

Overall, these related online degrees enhance knowledge and skills, increasing career flexibility in environmental policy, education, and community leadership fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joakim Pagels

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles