World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 95 637 567 346 303 234 31455

Mark T. Bedford publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark T. Bedford between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark T. Bedford published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2023. 24 of the 312 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2023. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 50 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 10 publications
1992 2025

312 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark T. Bedford: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 3
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 5
2003 4
2004 5
2005 7
2006 8
2007 11
2008 6
2009 12
2010 11
2011 14
2012 13
2013 10
2014 9
2015 13
2016 15
2017 13
2018 14
2019 12
2020 18
2021 15
2022 5
2023 50
2024 14
2025 10
Total 312
Download as CSV

Mark T. Bedford publications per year - data summary

  • Mark T. Bedford, a Molecular Biology scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, has 312 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 50 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992, 1993 and 1998, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 34 years in the span carries no publications at all (1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.5 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 94 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 27 publications (2.3 per year); 2004-2015: 119 publications (9.9 per year); 2016-2025: 166 publications (16.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mark T. Bedford publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. Bedford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 227–236 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 234 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74 234
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark T. Bedford publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Mark T. Bedford, a Molecular Biology scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, records 234 publications - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Mark T. Bedford, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Mark T. Bedford ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mark T. Bedford D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. Bedford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43 95
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark T. Bedford D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Mark T. Bedford, a Molecular Biology scholar from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, records 95 D-Index - the 80th percentile of the discipline.
  • 80% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Mark T. Bedford, and about 20% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Mark T. Bedford ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Mark T. Bedford is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a total of 127 publications. Within this main field, they focus extensively on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Plant Science, and Immunology.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of specialized topics including cancer-related gene regulation, epigenetics and DNA methylation, RNA modifications and cancer, genomics and chromatin dynamics, protein degradation and inhibitors, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, and mosquito-borne diseases and control.

Some of their recent notable papers include:

  • CARM1 regulates replication fork speed and stress response by stimulating PARP1 (2021, Molecular Cell)
  • Characterization of the plant homeodomain (PHD) reader family for their histone tail interactions (2020, Epigenetics & Chromatin)
  • The intrinsic substrate specificity of the human tyrosine kinome (2024, Nature)
  • Discovery of First-in-Class Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) Degraders (2020, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)
  • SARS-CoV-2 Envelope (E) protein interacts with PDZ-domain-2 of host tight junction protein ZO1 (2021, PLoS ONE)

Mark T. Bedford frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Their most frequent co-authors include Lila M. Gierasch, F. Peter Guengerich, Ruma Banerjee, Roger Colbran, and Peter Cresswell.

The scientist's publications appear predominantly in venues such as the Journal of Biological Chemistry with 38 publications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 10 publications, UNC Libraries with 5 publications, Nucleic Acids Research with 4 publications, and Nature Communications with 4 publications.

Best Publications

  • Protein Arginine Methylation in Mammals: Who, What, and Why

    Mark T. Bedford;Steven G. Clarke

  • Arginine methylation an emerging regulator of protein function.

    Mark T. Bedford;Stéphane Richard

  • Protein arginine methyltransferases and cancer.

    Yanzhong Yang;Mark T. Bedford

  • p53 is regulated by the lysine demethylase LSD1

    Jing Huang;Roopsha Sengupta;Alexsandra B. Espejo;Min Gyu Lee

  • Developmental localization of the splicing alternatives of fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2).

    Avi Orr-Urtreger;Mark T. Bedford;Tatjana Burakova;Esther Arman

  • Tudor, MBT and chromo domains gauge the degree of lysine methylation

    Jeesun Kim;Jeremy Daniel;Alexsandra Espejo;Aimee Lake

  • Histone arginine methylation

    Alessandra Di Lorenzo;Mark T. Bedford

  • Recognition of Histone H3 Lysine-4 Methylation by the Double Tudor Domain of JMJD2A

    Ying Huang;Jia Fang;Mark T. Bedford;Yi Zhang

  • The arginine methyltransferase CARM1 regulates the coupling of transcription and mRNA processing.

    Donghang Cheng;Jocelyn Côté;Salam Shaaban;Mark T. Bedford

  • A chromatin-wide transition to H4K20 monomethylation impairs genome integrity and programmed DNA rearrangements in the mouse

    Gunnar Schotta;Roopsha Sengupta;Roopsha Sengupta;Stefan Kubicek;Stephen Malin

  • Immunoaffinity Enrichment and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Protein Methylation

    Ailan Guo;Hongbo Gu;Jing Zhou;Daniel Mulhern

  • Arginine methylation at a glance.

    Mark T. Bedford

  • The Novel Human Protein Arginine N-Methyltransferase PRMT6 Is a Nuclear Enzyme Displaying Unique Substrate Specificity *

    Adam Frankel;Neelu Yadav;Jaeho Lee;Tina L. Branscombe

  • Small molecule regulators of protein arginine methyltransferases.

    Donghang Cheng;Neelu Yadav;Randall W. King;Maurice S. Swanson

  • Structural basis for G9a-like protein lysine methyltransferase inhibition by BIX-01294

    Yanqi Chang;Xing Zhang;John R. Horton;Anup K. Upadhyay

  • Association of UHRF1 with methylated H3K9 directs the maintenance of DNA methylation

    Scott B Rothbart;Krzysztof Krajewski;Nataliya Nady;Wolfram Tempel

  • Proteome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies several PHD fingers as novel direct and selective binding modules of histone H3 methylated at either lysine 4 or lysine 36.

    Xiaobing Shi;Ioulia Kachirskaia;Kay L. Walter;Jen Hao A. Kuo

  • Specific protein methylation defects and gene expression perturbations in coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1-deficient mice.

    Neelu Yadav;Jaeho Lee;Jeesun Kim;Jianjun Shen

  • Arginine methylation inhibits the binding of proline-rich ligands to Src homology 3, but not WW, domains

    Mark T. Bedford;Adam Frankel;Michael B. Yaffe;Steven Clarke

  • Sam68 RNA Binding Protein Is an In Vivo Substrate for Protein Arginine N-Methyltransferase 1

    Jocelyn Côté;François Michel Boisvert;Marie Chloé Boulanger;Mark T. Bedford

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiaodong Cheng
Xiaodong Cheng The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Steven Clarke
Steven Clarke University of California, Los Angeles
Brian D. Strahl
Brian D. Strahl University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mien Chie Hung
Mien Chie Hung China Medical University
Marius Sudol
Marius Sudol Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Stephen V. Frye
Stephen V. Frye University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Xiaobing Shi
Xiaobing Shi Van Andel Institute
Sharon Y.R. Dent
Sharon Y.R. Dent The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jianjun Shen
Jianjun Shen The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith Structural Genomics Consortium

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in molecular biology, you might also want to explore allied healthcare professions and flexible online pathways. For example, understanding how to become nurse practitioner can open doors to advanced roles in clinical research, diagnostics, or patient care.

Fast-track options like accelerated bsn programs offer a shorter timeline for registered nurses to advance their qualifications, letting you apply molecular biology knowledge directly in practice.

Bridge programs, such as rn to np programs, are ideal for those with an ADN aiming to reach nurse practitioner status efficiently. These programs often include coursework in genetics and pharmacology, areas closely related to molecular biology.

For those without a nursing background, online direct entry msn programs enable a quick transition into advanced nursing careers—leveraging scientific skills that align with molecular biology training.

Best Scientists Citing Mark T. Bedford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles