World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14439 13596 603 576 371 33601

Martin Post publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Post between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Post published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2023. 21 of the 424 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2023. 1980: 4 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 4 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 11 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 6 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 5 publications
1980 2025

424 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Post: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 4
1981 1
1982 4
1983 3
1984 11
1985 4
1986 1
1987 6
1988 1
1989 0
1990 4
1991 10
1992 7
1993 9
1994 10
1995 14
1996 16
1997 2
1998 9
1999 13
2000 15
2001 7
2002 5
2003 6
2004 13
2005 14
2006 10
2007 11
2008 6
2009 7
2010 14
2011 9
2012 10
2013 13
2014 9
2015 17
2016 13
2017 14
2018 12
2019 11
2020 10
2021 11
2022 12
2023 25
2024 16
2025 5
Total 424
Download as CSV

Martin Post publications per year - data summary

  • Martin Post, a Medicine scholar from University of Toronto, has 424 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1986 and 1988, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 46 years in the span carries no publications at all (1989).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.4 per year counting only the 45 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 69 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 89 publications (5.6 per year); 1996-2011: 157 publications (9.8 per year); 2012-2025: 178 publications (12.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Martin Post publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Post sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 371 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 371
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Post publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Martin Post, a Medicine scholar from University of Toronto, records 371 publications - the 32nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 32% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Martin Post, and about 68% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Martin Post ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Martin Post D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Post sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Martin Post D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Martin Post, a Medicine scholar from University of Toronto, records 85 D-Index - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Martin Post, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Martin Post ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Martin Post is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, specializing in medicine with a focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, molecular biology, and emergency medicine.

Their research spans several interconnected topics, including:

  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Pregnancy and Preeclampsia Studies
  • Congenital Diapaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Extracellular Vesicles in Disease
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Martin Post has contributed extensively to academic literature, with notable publications appearing primarily in the following venues:

  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
  • Placenta
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Critical Care

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Post include:

  • Positive End-Expiratory Pressure, Pleural Pressure, and Regional Compliance during Pronation. An Experimental Study, 2021, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Impact of Reverse Triggering Dyssynchrony during Lung-Protective Ventilation on Diaphragm Function: An Experimental Model, 2021, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Increased Placental Mitochondrial Fusion in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Adaptive Mechanism to Optimize Feto-Placental Metabolic Homeostasis?, 2020, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • TP63 Basal Cells Are Indispensable during Endoderm Differentiation into Proximal Airway Cells on Acellular Lung Scaffolds, 2021, npj Regenerative Medicine
  • Role of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Regional Transpulmonary Pressure in Asymmetrical Lung Injury, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Isabella Caniggia
  • Laurent Brochard
  • Michael L. Litvack
  • Bhushan H. Katira
  • Sruthi Alahari

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 mediates the biological effects of oxygen on human trophoblast differentiation through TGFβ3

    Isabella Caniggia;Homa Mostachfi;Jennifer Winter;Max Gassmann

  • Essential function of Gli2 and Gli3 in the formation of lung, trachea and oesophagus

    Jun Motoyama;Jason Liu;Rong Mo;Qi Ding

  • Oxygen and placental development during the first trimester: implications for the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia.

    I. Caniggia;J. Winter;S.J. Lye;M. Post

  • Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass. A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure

    Jeffrey P. Gold;Mary E. Charlson;Pamela Williams-Russo;Ted P. Szatrowski

  • Molecular Evidence of Placental Hypoxia in Preeclampsia

    Nima Soleymanlou;Igor Jurisica;Igor Jurisica;Ori Nevo;Francesca Ietta

  • Inhibition of TGF-β3 restores the invasive capability of extravillous trophoblasts in preeclamptic pregnancies

    Isabella Caniggia;Sorina Grisaru-Gravnosky;Maciej Kuliszewsky;Martin Post

  • Dual-Hit Hypothesis Explains Pulmonary Hypoplasia in the Nitrofen Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

    Richard Keijzer;Jason Liu;Julie Deimling;Dick Tibboel

  • Induction of the heat shock response reduces mortality rate and organ damage in a sepsis-induced acute lung injury model

    J. Villar;S. P. Ribeiro;J. B. M. Mullen;M. Kuliszewski

  • Mechanical force-induced signal transduction in lung cells.

    Mingyao Liu;A. Keith Tanswell;Martin Post

  • The basic-helix-loop-helix protein pod1 is critically important for kidney and lung organogenesis.

    Susan E. Quaggin;Lois Schwartz;Shiying Cui;Peter Igarashi

  • Therapeutic Hypercapnia Reduces Pulmonary and Systemic Injury following In Vivo Lung Reperfusion

    John G. Laffey;Motoshi Tanaka;Doreen Engelberts;Xiaoping Luo

  • Atelectasis Causes Alveolar Injury in Nonatelectatic Lung Regions

    Shinya Tsuchida;Doreen Engelberts;Vanya Peltekova;Natalie Hopkins

  • Stimulation of fetal rat lung cell proliferation in vitro by mechanical stretch

    M. Liu;S. J. M. Skinner;J. Xu;R. N. N. Han

  • The effect of reflux and bile acid aspiration on the lung allograft and its surfactant and innate immunity molecules SP-A and SP-D.

    F. D'Ovidio;M. Mura;R. Ridsdale;H. Takahashi

  • Induction of heat stress proteins is associated with decreased mortality in an animal model of acute lung injury.

    Jesus Villar;Jeffrey D. Edelson;Martin Post;J. Brendan M. Mullen

  • Conversion of Mechanical Force into Biochemical Signaling

    Bing Han;Xiao-Hui Bai;Monika Lodyga;Jing Xu

  • Targeting the mevalonate cascade as a new therapeutic approach in heart disease, cancer and pulmonary disease.

    Behzad Yeganeh;Emmilia Wiechec;Sudharsana R Ande;Pawan Sharma

  • Mechanical strain induces pp60src activation and translocation to cytoskeleton in fetal rat lung cells.

    Mingyao Liu;Yi Qin;Jason Liu;A. Keith Tanswell

  • Pathogenesis of interstitial fibrosis in chronic purine aminonucleoside nephrosis

    Colin Lindsay Jones;Shilpa J. Buch;Martin D. Post;Lori McCulloch

Frequent Co-Authors

Mingyao Liu
Mingyao Liu University Health Network
Shilpa Buch
Shilpa Buch University of Nebraska Medical Center
Cameron Ackerley
Cameron Ackerley University of Toronto
Dick Tibboel
Dick Tibboel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Stephen J. Lye
Stephen J. Lye University of Toronto
Colin McKerlie
Colin McKerlie Hospital for Sick Children
Saeid Ghavami
Saeid Ghavami University of Manitoba
Shaf Keshavjee
Shaf Keshavjee University Health Network
Niall D. Ferguson
Niall D. Ferguson University of Toronto
Janet Rossant
Janet Rossant University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical careers beyond the traditional MD route, there are numerous online degree paths to explore. Health care administration is a growing field, and pursuing one of the cheapest mha programs online can provide students with the skills to manage hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations.

Advanced practice roles like nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist may require a doctorate. Students looking for flexibility can consider the most affordable dnp programs, allowing them to further their nursing careers while balancing work and life commitments.

Pharmacy is another evolving sector, and the online pharmacy school cost is a major consideration for those wanting to pursue a Doctorate in Pharmacy (PharmD) in a flexible, online format. For those interested in the intersection of technology and healthcare, a health information management degree online can lead to roles managing electronic health records, data security, and regulatory compliance.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities to make an impact in healthcare, with online options providing greater accessibility and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Post

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles