World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wolfgang E. Berdel

Wolfgang E. Berdel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 111 5324 4999 294 281 900 46575

Wolfgang E. Berdel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wolfgang E. Berdel between 1952 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wolfgang E. Berdel published across 75 years, from 1952 to 2026, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 92 publications in 2023. 14 of the 1,025 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 92. Peak 92 publications in 2023. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 30 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 35 publications 2004: 39 publications 2005: 44 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 48 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 92 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 2 publications
1952 2026

1,025 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wolfgang E. Berdel: publications per year, 1952 to 2026
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 4
1982 7
1983 9
1984 3
1985 3
1986 3
1987 13
1988 2
1989 5
1990 12
1991 12
1992 7
1993 7
1994 11
1995 6
1996 12
1997 5
1998 8
1999 7
2000 16
2001 30
2002 15
2003 35
2004 39
2005 44
2006 38
2007 48
2008 32
2009 36
2010 34
2011 35
2012 41
2013 26
2014 34
2015 38
2016 47
2017 54
2018 36
2019 13
2020 20
2021 31
2022 24
2023 92
2024 15
2025 12
2026 2
Total 1,025
Download as CSV

Wolfgang E. Berdel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang E. Berdel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 900 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 900
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Wolfgang E. Berdel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang E. Berdel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 111
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wolfgang E. Berdel is affiliated with the University of Münster in Germany and has an extensive research background predominantly focused on hematology and related biomedical fields. Their work spans the broader domains of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong emphasis on hematologic malignancies and molecular oncology.

The scientist's research contributions are documented across several main topics, including:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments

Frequent publication venues for their work include journals well-regarded in the field of hematology and oncology:

  • Blood
  • Leukemia
  • Cancers
  • HemaSphere
  • Blood Advances

Wolfgang E. Berdel has collaborated with several researchers in the hematology and leukemia research communities. Notable frequent co-authors are:

  • Christoph Schliemann
  • Georg Lenz
  • Utz Krug
  • Jan Braess
  • Karsten Spiekermann

The following recent papers illustrate key areas of their research focus, including genetic risk stratification, mutation impact on outcomes, and treatment timing in acute myeloid leukemia (AML):

  • "Validation and refinement of the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia", 2020, Leukemia
  • "CEBPA mutations in 4708 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: differential impact of bZIP and TAD mutations on outcome", 2021, Blood
  • "Does time from diagnosis to treatment affect the prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia?", 2020, Blood
  • "Validation and refinement of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia", 2023, Leukemia
  • "The clinical mutatome of core binding factor leukemia", 2020, Leukemia

The subfields of study that frame Wolfgang E. Berdel's research include:

  • Hematology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Best Publications

  • MALAT-1, a novel noncoding RNA, and thymosin beta4 predict metastasis and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

    Ping Ji;Sven Diederichs;Wenbing Wang;Sebastian Böing

  • Flt3 mutations from patients with acute myeloid leukemia induce transformation of 32D cells mediated by the Ras and STAT5 pathways.

    Masao Mizuki;Regina Fenski;Hartmut Halfter;Itaru Matsumura

  • A 17-gene stemness score for rapid determination of risk in acute leukaemia

    Stanley W. K. Ng;Amanda Mitchell;James A. Kennedy;James A. Kennedy;James A. Kennedy;Weihsu C. Chen

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 in paracrine tumor-stromal cell interactions in multiple myeloma

    Berno Dankbar;Teresa Padró;Regine Leo;Birgit Feldmann

  • A phase 1 study of SU11248 in the treatment of patients with refractory or resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or not amenable to conventional therapy for the disease.

    Walter Fiedler;Hubert Serve;Hartmut Döhner;Michael Schwittay

  • Increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

    Teresa Padró;Sandra Ruiz;Ralf Bieker;Horst Bürger

  • Osteosarcoma Relapse After Combined Modality Therapy: An Analysis of Unselected Patients in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS)

    Beate Kempf-Bielack;Stefan S. Bielack;Heribert Jürgens;Detlev Branscheid

  • The long noncoding MALAT-1 RNA indicates a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer and induces migration and tumor growth.

    Lars Henning Schmidt;Tilmann Spieker;Steffen Koschmieder;Julia Humberg

  • Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: I. Anatomic and histologic distribution, clinical features, and survival data of 371 patients registered in the German Multicenter Study GIT NHL 01/92.

    Peter Koch;Francisco del Valle;Wolfgang E. Berdel;Normann A. Willich

  • Spectrum and prognostic relevance of driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia

    Klaus H. Metzeler;Klaus H. Metzeler;Tobias Herold;Tobias Herold;Maja Rothenberg-Thurley;Susanne Amler

  • Addition of sorafenib versus placebo to standard therapy in patients aged 60 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (SORAML): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial

    Christoph Röllig;Hubert Serve;Andreas Hüttmann;Richard Noppeney

  • An 86-probe-set gene-expression signature predicts survival in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.

    Klaus H. Metzeler;Manuela Hummel;Clara D. Bloomfield;Karsten Spiekermann

  • Inherited and Somatic Defects in DDX41 in Myeloid Neoplasms.

    Chantana Polprasert;Isabell Schulze;Mikkael Sekeres;Hideki Makishima

  • An Innovative Phase I Clinical Study Demonstrates Inhibition of FLT3 Phosphorylation by SU11248 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

    Anne Marie O'Farrell;James M. Foran;Walter Fiedler;Hubert Serve

  • Age-Related Risk Profile and Chemotherapy Dose Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Study by the German Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cooperative Group

    Thomas Büchner;Wolfgang E. Berdel;Claudia Haferlach;Torsten Haferlach

  • Early blast clearance by remission induction therapy is a major independent prognostic factor for both achievement of complete remission and long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) 1992 Trial

    Wolfgang Kern;Torsten Haferlach;Claudia Schoch;Helmut Löffler

  • Effect of preoperative chemoradiation in addition to preoperative chemotherapy: a randomised trial in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

    Michael Thomas;Michael Thomas;Christian Rübe;Petra Hoffknecht;Hans N Macha

  • A phase 2 clinical study of SU5416 in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

    Walter Fiedler;Rolf Mesters;Heike Tinnefeld;Sonja Loges

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Biallelic CEBPA Gene Mutations and Normal Karyotype Represents a Distinct Genetic Entity Associated With a Favorable Clinical Outcome

    Annika Dufour;Friederike Schneider;Klaus H. Metzeler;Eva Hoster

  • GERMAN MULTICENTER STUDY GROUP. PRIMARY GASTROINTESTINAL NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA: I. ANATOMIC AND HISTOLOGIC DISTRIBUTION, CLINICAL FEATURES, AND SURVIVAL DATA OF 371 PATIENTS REGISTERED IN THE GERMAN MULTICENTER STUDY GIT NHL 01/92

    P Koch;F Del Valle;W E Berdel;N A Willich

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Müller-Tidow
Carsten Müller-Tidow University Hospital Heidelberg
Hubert Serve
Hubert Serve Goethe University Frankfurt
Wolfgang Hiddemann
Wolfgang Hiddemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Achim Heinecke
Achim Heinecke University of Münster
Stefan K. Bohlander
Stefan K. Bohlander University of Auckland
Martin Dugas
Martin Dugas Heidelberg University
Stefan W. Krause
Stefan W. Krause University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in medicine or healthcare, there are numerous online degree options and fast-track opportunities available. Online programs offer flexibility, making it easier for students to continue their education while managing other responsibilities.

If you are looking for the highest level of nursing credentials, exploring dnp programs online is a great next step. These programs are designed for advanced practice nurses seeking leadership and clinical expertise roles.

For students interested in entering the workforce quickly, a 6 month lpn program online can fast-track your career as a Licensed Practical Nurse. These programs are ideal for those wanting to gain essential nursing skills in a short timeframe.

Mental health is a growing field, and pursuing psych np programs online can prepare you for specialized roles in psychiatric nursing. These programs offer advanced clinical training for those committed to making an impact in mental healthcare.

Finally, if you are interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are several online healthcare administration programs to consider. These degrees can lead to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang E. Berdel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles