World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5106 4736 2808 2541 140 19608

Thomas A. Wright publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas A. Wright between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas A. Wright published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2009. 7 of the 224 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2009. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 10 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1972 2025

224 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas A. Wright: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 7
1990 6
1991 3
1992 1
1993 6
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 10
1998 4
1999 8
2000 8
2001 5
2002 6
2003 6
2004 4
2005 0
2006 6
2007 7
2008 2
2009 16
2010 14
2011 15
2012 8
2013 14
2014 6
2015 4
2016 4
2017 6
2018 7
2019 2
2020 8
2021 5
2022 5
2023 6
2024 3
2025 4
Total 224
Download as CSV

Thomas A. Wright publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas A. Wright, a Psychology scholar from Fordham University, has 224 publications recorded across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1972 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1972, 1975, 1986, 1988 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 14 of the 54 years in the span carry no publications at all (1973, 1974, 1976, 1977 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.6 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 23 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1972-1989: 13 publications (0.7 per year); 1990-2007: 82 publications (4.6 per year); 2008-2025: 129 publications (7.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas A. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Wright sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas A. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Thomas A. Wright, a Psychology scholar from Fordham University, records 140 publications - the 44th percentile of the discipline.
  • 44% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Thomas A. Wright, and about 56% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Thomas A. Wright ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Thomas A. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Wright sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Thomas A. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Thomas A. Wright, a Psychology scholar from Fordham University, records 51 D-Index - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Thomas A. Wright, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Thomas A. Wright ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Thomas A. Wright is affiliated with Fordham University in the United States. Their research lies predominantly in the field of Engineering, with significant contributions to Electrical and Electronic Engineering as well as Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Additional focus areas include Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, and Oncology.

Their scholarly output covers a range of scientific topics, including:

  • Optical Network Technologies
  • Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
  • Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
  • Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Phosphodiesterase function and regulation

Wright has published research articles in various academic journals with a number of recurring venues such as Organizational Dynamics, Optical Fiber Technology, International Journal of Drug Policy, Journal of Management Inquiry, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

The more recent publications authored or co-authored by Wright include:

  • "Character in crisis," 2020, published in Organizational Dynamics
  • "Cancer: Phosphodiesterase type 4C (PDE4C), the forgotten subfamily as a therapeutic target," 2023, published in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology

In addition, Wright has been linked to other important papers, including:

  • "Ultratunable Quantum Frequency Conversion in Photonic Crystal Fiber," 2022, published in Physical Review Letters
  • "Transmission properties of tapered optical fibres: Simulations and experimental measurements," 2021, published in Optical Fiber Technology
  • "Clinacanthus nutans extract lowers periodontal inflammation under high-glucose conditions via inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway," 2024, published in Frontiers in Pharmacology

Frequent co-authors associated with Wright's work include Stephanos Yerolatsitis, Piyamas Choochalerm, W. E. Martin, H. R. A. Jones, and Connor M. Blair. These collaborators reflect interdisciplinary expertise that supports Wright's broad research interests.

Best Publications

  • Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover.

    Thomas A. Wright;Russell Cropanzano

  • Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance.

    Thomas A. Wright;Russell Cropanzano

  • Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning

    Douglas G. Bonett;Thomas A. Wright

  • Sample size requirements for estimating pearson, kendall and spearman correlations

    Douglas G. Bonett;Thomas A. Wright

  • Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover

    Thomas A. Wright;Douglas G. Bonett

  • Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance.

    Unknown

  • The Moderating Role of Employee Positive Well Being on the Relation Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance

    Thomas A. Wright;Russell Cropanzano;Douglas G. Bonett

  • The contribution of burnout to work performance.

    Thomas A. Wright;Douglas G. Bonett

  • When a "happy" worker is really a "productive" worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis.

    Russell Cropanzano;Thomas A. Wright

  • The Moderating Effects of Employee Tenure on the Relation Between Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis

    Thomas A. Wright;Douglas G. Bonett

  • Affect and favorable work outcomes: two longitudinal tests of the happy–productive worker thesis

    Thomas A. Wright;Barry M. Staw

  • The Role of Psychological Well-Being in Job Performance:: A Fresh Look at an Age-Old Quest

    Thomas A. Wright;Russell Cropanzano

  • Positive organizational behavior: an idea whose time has truly come

    Thomas A. Wright

  • Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta-analysis

    Herman Aguinis;Ryan K. Gottfredson;Thomas A. Wright

  • Character Is Not “Dead” in Management Research: A Review of Individual Character and Organizational-Level Virtue†:

    Thomas A. Wright;Jerry Goodstein

  • A 5-year study of change in the relationship between well-being and job performance.

    Russell Cropanzano;Thomas A. Wright

  • Mental health and work performance: Results of a longitudinal field study

    Thomas A. Wright;Douglas G. Bonett;Dennis A. Sweeney

  • When a happy worker is a productive worker: A preliminary examination of three models

    Thomas A. Wright;Russell Cropanzano;Philip J. Denney;Gary L. Moline

  • Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover.

    Unknown

  • The many benefits of employee well-being in organizational research

    Thomas A. Wright;Ching-Chu Huang

  • The emergence of job satisfaction in organizational behavior

    Thomas A. Wright

  • The effect of turnover on work satisfaction and mental health: Support for a situational perspective

    Thomas A. Wright;Douglas G. Bonett

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas G. Bonett
Douglas G. Bonett University of California, Santa Cruz
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
Debra L. Nelson
Debra L. Nelson Oklahoma State University
James Campbell Quick
James Campbell Quick The University of Texas at Arlington
Barry M. Staw
Barry M. Staw University of California, Berkeley
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Wayne A. Hochwarter
Wayne A. Hochwarter Florida State University
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Mary M. Crossan
Mary M. Crossan University of Western Ontario
Sean T. Hannah
Sean T. Hannah Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA offers diverse pathways, from clinical work to counseling and therapy. Many choose to specialize in marriage and family therapy (MFT), a field with unique licensure requirements based on location. Interested students should be aware that becoming an MFT involves specific educational credentials and supervised clinical experience.

For example, if you are curious about mft requirements in Los Angeles, you’ll find local details on coursework, practicum hours, and state licensure exams. Similarly, explore step-by-step guidance on how to become an mft in Louisville, with insights into Kentucky’s specific process for new professionals.

If you have plans to practice in Texas, review how to become an mft in Lubbock to understand their distinct requirements. Meanwhile, those interested in Wisconsin can learn more about Madison mft certification requirements.

Choosing an online degree in psychology or counseling can help you meet most foundational requirements while offering flexibility for fieldwork and internships within your state.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas A. Wright

Trending Scientists