World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
6920
World Ranking
5416
National Ranking
2406

George D. Pollak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George D. Pollak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 108 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

George D. Pollak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George D. Pollak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

George D. Pollak is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with contributions spanning subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sensory Systems, and Neurology.

The scientist has published research covering a range of topics including:

  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders

George D. Pollak's recent scholarly output includes two papers published in 2020 at UNC Libraries:

  • "The dominance of inhibition in the inferior colliculus," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Inhibitory projections from the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and superior paraolivary nucleus create directional selectivity of frequency modulations in the inferior colliculus: A comparison of bats with other mammals," 2020, UNC Libraries

Their frequent collaborators consist of:

  • Ruili Xie
  • Joshua X. Gittelman
  • Sari Andoni
  • Na Li

George D. Pollak's work has been frequently published in UNC Libraries, indicating a consistent focus within this venue.

Best Publications

  • Disproportionate frequency representation in the inferior colliculus of doppler-compensating Greater Horseshoe bats: Evidence for an acoustic fovea

    Gerd Schuller;George D Pollak

  • GABA and glycine in the central auditory system of the mustache bat: Structural substrates for inhibitory neuronal organization

    Jeffery A. Winer;David T. Larue;George D. Pollak

  • The Neural Basis of Echolocation in Bats

    George D. Pollak;John H. Casseday

  • GABA shapes sensitivity to interaural intensity disparities in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus: implications for encoding sound location

    Thomas J. Park;George D. Pollak

  • Topology of the central nucleus of the mustache bat's inferior colliculus: correlation of single unit properties and neuronal architecture.

    J. M. Zook;J. M. Zook;J. A. Winer;George D Pollak;R. D. Bodenhamer

  • Syllable acoustics, temporal patterns, and call composition vary with behavioral context in Mexican free-tailed bats

    Kirsten M. Bohn;Barbara Schmidt-French;Sean T. Ma;George D. Pollak

  • GABA shapes a topographic organization of response latency in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus

    Thomas J. Park;George D. Pollak

  • Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Inferior Colliculus Revealing Selectivity for Spectral Motion in Conspecific Vocalizations

    Sari Andoni;Na Li;George D. Pollak

  • The effects of GABAergic inhibition on monaural response properties of neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus

    George D. Pollak;Thomas J. Park

  • Dissecting the circuitry of the auditory system

    Unknown

  • Neural Delays Shape Selectivity to Interaural Intensity Differences in the Lateral Superior Olive

    Thomas J. Park;Benedikt Grothe;George D. Pollak;Gerd Schuller

  • Reversible inactivation of the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus reveals its role in the processing of multiple sound sources in the inferior colliculus of bats

    R. Michael Burger;R. Michael Burger;George D. Pollak

  • Response selectivity for species-specific calls in the inferior colliculus of Mexican free-tailed bats is generated by inhibition.

    Achim Klug;Eric E. Bauer;Joshua T. Hanson;Laura Hurley

  • Time is traded for intensity in the bat's auditory system

    George D Pollak

  • Origin of ascending projections to an isofrequency region of the mustache bat's inferior colliculus.

    Linda S. Ross;George D. Pollak;John M. Zook

  • Specialized characteristics of single units in inferior colliculus of mustache bat: frequency representation, tuning, and discharge patterns.

    George D Pollak;R. D. Bodenhamer

  • Binaural response organization within a frequency-band representation of the inferior colliculus: implications for sound localization

    JJ Wenstrup;LS Ross;GD Pollak

  • Versatility and Stereotypy of Free-Tailed Bat Songs

    Kirsten M. Bohn;Kirsten M. Bohn;Barbara Schmidt-French;Christine Schwartz;Michael Smotherman

  • Glycine and GABA influence binaural processing in the inferior colliculus of the mustache bat

    Achim Klug;T. J. Park;G. D. Pollak

  • Analysis of the role of inhibition in shaping responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the inferior colliculus.

    Unknown

  • Determinants of sound location selectivity in bat inferior colliculus: a combined dichotic and free-field stimulation study.

    Z. M. Fuzessery;George D Pollak

  • Characteristics of phasic on neurons in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized bats with observations relating to mechanisms for echo ranging

    George D Pollak;D. S. Marsh;R. Bodenhamer;A. Souther

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey J. Wenstrup
Jeffrey J. Wenstrup Northeast Ohio Medical University
John H. Casseday
John H. Casseday University of Washington
Benedikt Grothe
Benedikt Grothe Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jeffery A. Winer
Jeffery A. Winer University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a wide range of related online degrees and career options are available. Many choose to pursue an online master's degree in psychology, which can open doors in research, clinical, or educational settings. Before enrolling, it’s important to consider how much does a masters in psychology cost, as tuition varies widely across institutions.

If you are looking for affordable undergraduate options, researching the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology is a practical starting point. Psychology and neuroscience often intersect, and online education makes these paths more accessible.

Specialized areas such as therapy or social work are also excellent complements to neuroscience studies. Consider an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy or explore the online master's in social work for broader career opportunities in mental health. Each program offers unique skills and can lead to roles in counseling, advocacy, or public health.

Best Scientists Citing George D. Pollak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles