World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 88 1161 558 358 30573

Austin L. Hughes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Austin L. Hughes between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Austin L. Hughes published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2004. 2 of the 408 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2004. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1980 2025

408 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Austin L. Hughes: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 2
1982 5
1983 2
1984 1
1985 4
1986 5
1987 3
1988 5
1989 3
1990 5
1991 11
1992 12
1993 13
1994 13
1995 11
1996 13
1997 12
1998 7
1999 14
2000 14
2001 14
2002 16
2003 14
2004 28
2005 23
2006 12
2007 24
2008 17
2009 13
2010 14
2011 16
2012 14
2013 13
2014 15
2015 10
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 2
Total 408
Download as CSV

Austin L. Hughes publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Austin L. Hughes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 355–364 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 358 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48 358
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Austin L. Hughes D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Austin L. Hughes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102 88
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Austin L. Hughes was affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focused on medicine, with significant contributions in public health, environmental and occupational health, molecular biology, immunology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.

The scientist published extensively on topics related to malaria research and control, mosquito-borne diseases and control, vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches, traditional and medicinal uses of Annonaceae, the complement system in diseases, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and alkaloids including their synthesis and pharmacology.

Some of their recent papers included the following:

  • Evidence of Artemisinin-Resistant Malaria in Africa, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Recovery and stable persistence of chloroquine sensitivity in Plasmodium falciparum parasites after its discontinued use in Northern Uganda, 2020, Malaria Journal
  • Global Repertoire of Human Antibodies Against Plasmodium falciparum RIFINs, SURFINs, and STEVORs in a Malaria Exposed Population, 2020, Frontiers in Immunology
  • First-in-human randomised trial and follow-up study of Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage malaria vaccine BK-SE36 with CpG-ODN(K3), 2020, Vaccine
  • Plasmodium falciparum RIFIN is a novel ligand for inhibitory immune receptor LILRB2, 2021, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

The scientist frequently collaborated with other researchers such as Nirianne Palacpac, Takahiro Tougan, Yusuke Hirasawa, Hiroshi Morita, and Alfarius Eko Nugroho.

Their work was published often in venues including Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Journal of Natural Medicines, Frontiers in Immunology, Parasitology International, and Malaria Journal.

Austin L. Hughes was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection

    Austin L. Hughes;Masatoshi Nei

  • The Evolution of Functionally Novel Proteins after Gene Duplication

    Austin L. Hughes

  • Nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class II loci: evidence for overdominant selection.

    Austin L. Hughes;Masatoshi Nei

  • Tat-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes select for SIV escape variants during resolution of primary viraemia.

    Todd M. Allen;David H. O'Connor;Peicheng Jing;John L. Dzuris

  • A new antigen receptor gene family that undergoes rearrangement and extensive somatic diversification in sharks

    Greenberg As;Avila D;Hughes M;Hughes A

  • Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates

    Austin L. Hughes;Meredith Yeager

  • The outcome of hepatitis C virus infection is predicted by escape mutations in epitopes targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

    Ann L Erickson;Yoichi Kimura;Suzu Igarashi;Jennifer Eichelberger

  • Virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses select for amino-acid variation in simian immunodeficiency virus Env and Nef.

    David T. Evans;David T. Evans;David H. O'Connor;Peicheng Jing;John L. Dzuris

  • Reversion of CTL escape-variant immunodeficiency viruses in vivo.

    Thomas C Friedrich;Elizabeth J Dodds;Levi J Yant;Lara Vojnov

  • Acute phase cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape is a hallmark of simian immunodeficiency virus infection.

    David H. O'Connor;Todd M. Allen;Thorsten U. Vogel;Peicheng Jing

  • Persistent hepatitis C virus infection in a chimpanzee is associated with emergence of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte escape variant.

    Amy Weiner;Ann L. Erickson;Joe Kansopon;Kevin Crawford

  • A genome-wide screen identifies a single β-defensin gene cluster in the chicken: implications for the origin and evolution of mammalian defensins

    Yanjing Xiao;Austin L. Hughes;Junko Ando;Yoichi Matsuda

  • Evolution of duplicate genes in a tetraploid animal, Xenopus laevis.

    Marianne K. Hughes;Austin L. Hughes

  • Looking for Darwin in all the wrong places: the misguided quest for positive selection at the nucleotide sequence level

    A L Hughes

  • Positive Darwinian selection promotes charge profile diversity in the antigen-binding cleft of class I major-histocompatibility-complex molecules.

    A L Hughes;T Ota;M Nei

  • Evolution of the major histocompatibility complex: independent origin of nonclassical class I genes in different groups of mammals.

    A L Hughes;M Nei

  • Natural selection on Plasmodium surface proteins

    Marianne K. Hughes;Austin L. Hughes

  • Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes.

    Robert Friedman;Austin L. Hughes

  • Small genomes for better flyers

    Austin L. Hughes;Marianne K. Hughes

  • New recombinant HLA-B alleles in a tribe of South American Amerindians indicate rapid evolution of MHC class I loci

    David I. Watkins;Stephen N. McAdam;Xiaomin Liu;Clarice R. Strang

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. O’Connor
David H. O’Connor University of Wisconsin–Madison
David I. Watkins
David I. Watkins George Washington University
Thomas C. Friedrich
Thomas C. Friedrich University of Wisconsin–Madison
Meredith Yeager
Meredith Yeager Hood College
Alessandro Sette
Alessandro Sette La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Roger W. Wiseman
Roger W. Wiseman University of Wisconsin–Madison
John Sidney
John Sidney La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Emma Gostick
Emma Gostick Cardiff University
Christopher M. Walker
Christopher M. Walker The Ohio State University
Stephen J. Chanock
Stephen J. Chanock National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of Genetics continues to expand, many students explore related healthcare degrees that offer flexible and efficient pathways into the workforce. Online programs make it possible to study key healthcare topics while balancing other life commitments.

For example, registered nurses seeking to advance their education can look for rn to bsn no clinical hours programs. These allow students to complete coursework online without the need for traditional clinical placements. Similarly, aspiring nurse leaders can pursue short dnp programs that are designed to accelerate the path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Those interested in entering healthcare quickly may consider earning medical assistant certification, which can be completed in as little as six weeks through fast-track online options. For working professionals, easiest online dnp programs offer accessibility and convenience, making advanced nursing credentials more attainable.

Exploring these diverse options can open further career avenues for those passionate about genetics and healthcare, providing flexible learning formats to match individual goals.

Best Scientists Citing Austin L. Hughes