World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
34222
World Ranking
12106
National Ranking
656

Uwe Zeymer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Zeymer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 748 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Uwe Zeymer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Zeymer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Uwe Zeymer is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work intersects multiple subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial" (2022), published in Nature Medicine
  • "Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock" (2023), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation" (2021), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A document of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology" (2020), published in European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • "Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial" (2022), published in European Heart Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Hölger Thiele
  • Steffen Desch
  • Steffen Schneider
  • Anne Freund
  • Taoufik Ouarrak

They commonly publish in the following venues:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation.

    Christopher P. Cannon;Deepak L. Bhatt;Jonas Oldgren;Gregory Y.H. Lip

  • PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock

    Holger Thiele;Ibrahim Akin;Marcus Sandri;Georg Fuernau

  • Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries

    Petr Widimsky;William Wijns;Jean Fajadet;Mark de Belder

  • Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial

    Holger Thiele;Uwe Zeymer;Franz-Josef Neumann;Miroslaw Ferenc

  • Prehospital Ticagrelor in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Gilles Montalescot;Arnoud W. van 't Hof;Frédéric Lapostolle;Johanne Silvain

  • Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock.

    Veli-Pekka Harjola;Johan Lassus;Alessandro Sionis;Lars Køber

  • Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study

    G Habib;P A Erba;P A Erba;B Iung;E Donal

  • β-Blocker Use and Clinical Outcomes in Stable Outpatients With and Without Coronary Artery Disease

    Sripal Bangalore;Gabriel Steg;Prakash Deedwania;Kevin Crowley

  • Bivalirudin Started during Emergency Transport for Primary PCI

    Philippe Gabriel Steg;Christian W. Hamm;Peter Clemmensen;Frédéric Lapostolle

  • Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019

    Holger Thiele;E Magnus Ohman;Suzanne de Waha-Thiele;Uwe Zeymer

  • Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)

    Gregory Y H Lip;Stephan Windecker;Kurt Huber;Paulus Kirchhof

  • Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

    Benedikt Schrage;Karim Ibrahim;Tobias Loehn;Nikos Werner

  • Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.

    P. G. Steg;K. Huber;F. Andreotti;H. Arnesen

  • The Na^+/H^+ exchange inhibitor eniporide as an adjunct to early reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction : Results of the evaluation of the safety and cardioprotective effects of eniporide in acute myocardial infarction (ESCAMI) trial

    Uwe Zeymer;Harry Suryapranata;Jean Pierre Monassier;Grzegorz Opolski

  • Intravenous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the international randomised open-label ATOLL trial.

    Gilles Montalescot;Uwe Zeymer;Johanne Silvain;Bertrand Boulanger

  • One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock

    Holger Thiele;Ibrahim Akin;Marcus Sandri;Suzanne de Waha-Thiele

  • Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

    Uwe Zeymer;Albrecht Vogt;Ralf Zahn;Michael A Weber

  • Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

    Janine Pöss;Jelena Köster;Georg Fuernau;Ingo Eitel

  • Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients'data

    S Yusuf;C Granger;J Eikelboom;S Mehta

  • Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial.

    Holger Thiele;Uwe Zeymer;Nathalie Thelemann;Franz-Josef Neumann

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger Thiele
Holger Thiele Leipzig University
Kurt Huber
Kurt Huber Sigmund Freud University Vienna
Steffen Desch
Steffen Desch Leipzig University
Gilles Montalescot
Gilles Montalescot Baim Institute for Clinical Research
Christian W. Hamm
Christian W. Hamm University of Giessen
Ingo Eitel
Ingo Eitel University of Lübeck
Héctor Bueno
Héctor Bueno Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Karl Werdan
Karl Werdan Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Jurriën M. ten Berg
Jurriën M. ten Berg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric Vicaut
Eric Vicaut Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare doesn’t always start with attending medical school. There are a variety of online degree options and evolving career pathways to consider. Many students are opting for specialized nursing degrees that offer more flexibility and speed.

For nurses who want to earn their bachelor’s degree without the need for clinicals, rn bsn online programs no clinicals are an efficient choice. Those who wish to advance their education even further can explore dnp online programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in healthcare.

Time-conscious professionals may be interested in accelerated options. Some 1 year dnp program online choices allow students to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in a shorter time frame. Additionally, lpn programs offer a fast-track route into practical nursing for those starting their careers.

These alternative online pathways can help individuals enter or advance in the healthcare field quickly, providing both flexibility and career growth opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Uwe Zeymer

Trending Scientists