World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 12105 11386 657 633 748 34222

Uwe Zeymer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Uwe Zeymer between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Uwe Zeymer published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 22.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2013. 49 of the 863 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2013. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 44 publications 2012: 43 publications 2013: 67 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 48 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 48 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

863 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Uwe Zeymer: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 4
1997 1
1998 4
1999 7
2000 4
2001 6
2002 5
2003 20
2004 24
2005 10
2006 13
2007 27
2008 21
2009 35
2010 40
2011 44
2012 43
2013 67
2014 26
2015 42
2016 33
2017 48
2018 41
2019 48
2020 45
2021 46
2022 29
2023 32
2024 41
2025 48
2026 1
Total 863
Download as CSV

Uwe Zeymer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Zeymer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 748 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 748
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Uwe Zeymer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Zeymer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Uwe Zeymer is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work intersects multiple subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial" (2022), published in Nature Medicine
  • "Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock" (2023), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation" (2021), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A document of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology" (2020), published in European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • "Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial" (2022), published in European Heart Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Hölger Thiele
  • Steffen Desch
  • Steffen Schneider
  • Anne Freund
  • Taoufik Ouarrak

They commonly publish in the following venues:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with Dabigatran after PCI in Atrial Fibrillation.

    Christopher P. Cannon;Deepak L. Bhatt;Jonas Oldgren;Gregory Y.H. Lip

  • PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock

    Holger Thiele;Ibrahim Akin;Marcus Sandri;Georg Fuernau

  • Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries

    Petr Widimsky;William Wijns;Jean Fajadet;Mark de Belder

  • Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial

    Holger Thiele;Uwe Zeymer;Franz-Josef Neumann;Miroslaw Ferenc

  • Prehospital Ticagrelor in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Gilles Montalescot;Arnoud W. van 't Hof;Frédéric Lapostolle;Johanne Silvain

  • Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock.

    Veli-Pekka Harjola;Johan Lassus;Alessandro Sionis;Lars Køber

  • Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study

    G Habib;P A Erba;P A Erba;B Iung;E Donal

  • β-Blocker Use and Clinical Outcomes in Stable Outpatients With and Without Coronary Artery Disease

    Sripal Bangalore;Gabriel Steg;Prakash Deedwania;Kevin Crowley

  • Bivalirudin Started during Emergency Transport for Primary PCI

    Philippe Gabriel Steg;Christian W. Hamm;Peter Clemmensen;Frédéric Lapostolle

  • Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019

    Holger Thiele;E Magnus Ohman;Suzanne de Waha-Thiele;Uwe Zeymer

  • Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)

    Gregory Y H Lip;Stephan Windecker;Kurt Huber;Paulus Kirchhof

  • Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

    Benedikt Schrage;Karim Ibrahim;Tobias Loehn;Nikos Werner

  • Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.

    P. G. Steg;K. Huber;F. Andreotti;H. Arnesen

  • The Na^+/H^+ exchange inhibitor eniporide as an adjunct to early reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction : Results of the evaluation of the safety and cardioprotective effects of eniporide in acute myocardial infarction (ESCAMI) trial

    Uwe Zeymer;Harry Suryapranata;Jean Pierre Monassier;Grzegorz Opolski

  • Intravenous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the international randomised open-label ATOLL trial.

    Gilles Montalescot;Uwe Zeymer;Johanne Silvain;Bertrand Boulanger

  • One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock

    Holger Thiele;Ibrahim Akin;Marcus Sandri;Suzanne de Waha-Thiele

  • Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

    Uwe Zeymer;Albrecht Vogt;Ralf Zahn;Michael A Weber

  • Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

    Janine Pöss;Jelena Köster;Georg Fuernau;Ingo Eitel

  • Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients'data

    S Yusuf;C Granger;J Eikelboom;S Mehta

  • Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial.

    Holger Thiele;Uwe Zeymer;Nathalie Thelemann;Franz-Josef Neumann

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger Thiele
Holger Thiele Leipzig University
Kurt Huber
Kurt Huber Sigmund Freud University Vienna
Steffen Desch
Steffen Desch Leipzig University
Gilles Montalescot
Gilles Montalescot Baim Institute for Clinical Research
Christian W. Hamm
Christian W. Hamm University of Giessen
Ingo Eitel
Ingo Eitel University of Lübeck
Héctor Bueno
Héctor Bueno Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Karl Werdan
Karl Werdan Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Jurriën M. ten Berg
Jurriën M. ten Berg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric Vicaut
Eric Vicaut Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or healthcare doesn’t always start with attending medical school. There are a variety of online degree options and evolving career pathways to consider. Many students are opting for specialized nursing degrees that offer more flexibility and speed.

For nurses who want to earn their bachelor’s degree without the need for clinicals, rn bsn online programs no clinicals are an efficient choice. Those who wish to advance their education even further can explore dnp online programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in healthcare.

Time-conscious professionals may be interested in accelerated options. Some 1 year dnp program online choices allow students to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in a shorter time frame. Additionally, lpn programs offer a fast-track route into practical nursing for those starting their careers.

These alternative online pathways can help individuals enter or advance in the healthcare field quickly, providing both flexibility and career growth opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Uwe Zeymer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles