World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 38 8507 8166 524 512 104 9801

Franz Buegger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franz Buegger between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franz Buegger published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2024. 11 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2024. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franz Buegger: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 8
2010 3
2011 10
2012 7
2013 7
2014 9
2015 7
2016 4
2017 6
2018 2
2019 3
2020 5
2021 8
2022 7
2023 8
2024 11
2025 9
2026 2
Total 133
Download as CSV

Franz Buegger publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Buegger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 104
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Franz Buegger D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franz Buegger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265 38
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Franz Buegger is affiliated with Helmholtz Zentrum München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with 59 publications in this field, and Environmental Science, which includes 27 publications.

The scientist's work extends into several subfields, notably Plant Science with 29 publications, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics with 11, Soil Science and Cell Biology each with 9, and Ecology with 8 publications. Their research encompasses various topics including Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (28 publications), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (18 publications), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (18 publications), Lichen and Fungal Ecology (14 publications), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (12 publications), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (12 publications), and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (10 publications).

Frequent co-authors in their research include Karin Pritsch (16 collaborations), Mohammad Bahram (12), Rein Drenkhan (11), Niloufar Hagh-Doust (11), and Vladimir Mikryukov (11).

Franz Buegger has published multiple articles in several key scientific journals. The most frequent venues include Global Change Biology with 7 publications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 5, Geoderma and Biology and Fertility of Soils with 3 each, and Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) also with 3 publications.

Selected recent papers by Franz Buegger include:

  • Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Regional-Scale In-Depth Analysis of Soil Fungal Diversity Reveals Strong pH and Plant Species Effects in Northern Europe, 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The Global Soil Mycobiome consortium dataset for boosting fungal diversity research, 2021, Fungal Diversity
  • Global patterns in endemicity and vulnerability of soil fungi, 2022, Global Change Biology
  • Origin of volatile organic compound emissions from subarctic tundra under global warming, 2020, Global Change Biology

Best Publications

  • Global diversity and geography of soil fungi

    Leho Tedersoo;Mohammad Bahram;Sergei Põlme;Urmas Kõljalg

  • Emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 from soil fertilized with nitrate: effect of compaction, soil moisture and rewetting

    Reiner Ruser;Heinz Flessa;Rolf Russow;Gustav Schmidt

  • Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon.

    Kristina Witzgall;Alix Vidal;David I. Schubert;Carmen Höschen

  • Submicron structures provide preferential spots for carbon and nitrogen sequestration in soils

    Cordula Vogel;Carsten W. Mueller;Carmen Höschen;Franz Buegger

  • Tree diversity and species identity effects on soil fungi, protists and animals are context dependent

    Leho Tedersoo;Mohammad Bahram;Tomáš Cajthaml;Sergei Põlme

  • Estimating N rhizodeposition of grain legumes using a 15N in situ stem labelling method

    Jochen Mayer;Franz Buegger;Erik Steen Jensen;Michael Schloter

  • Regional-scale in-depth analysis of soil fungal diversity reveals strong pH and plant species effects in Northern Europe

    Leho Tedersoo;Sten Anslan;Sten Anslan;Mohammad Bahram;Mohammad Bahram;Rein Drenkhan

  • The determination of δ13C in soil microbial biomass using fumigation-extraction

    Martin Potthoff;Norman Loftfield;Franz Buegger;Barbara Wick

  • Enzymatic activities and stable isotope patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungi in relation to phylogeny and exploration types in an afrotropical rain forest

    Leho Tedersoo;Leho Tedersoo;Triin Naadel;Mohammad Bahram;Karin Pritsch

  • Influence of a nitrification inhibitor and of placed N-fertilization on N2O fluxes from a vegetable cropped loamy soil

    Helena Pfab;Iris Palmer;Franz Buegger;Sabine Fiedler

  • The Global Soil Mycobiome consortium dataset for boosting fungal diversity research

    Leho Tedersoo;Vladimir Mikryukov;Sten Anslan;Mohammad Bahram

  • Residual nitrogen contribution from grain legumes to succeeding wheat and rape and related microbial process

    Jochen Mayer;Franz Buegger;Erik Steen Jensen;Michael Schloter

  • Clay mineral composition modifies decomposition and sequestration of organic carbon and nitrogen in fine soil fractions

    Cordula Vogel;Katja Heister;Franz Buegger;Irina Tanuwidjaja

  • Microbial response to exudates in the rhizosphere of young beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) after dormancy

    J. Esperschütz;F. Buegger;J.B. Winkler;J.C. Munch

  • Microbial immobilisation of 13C rhizodeposits in rhizosphere and root-free soil under continuous 13C labelling of oats

    Ilya Yevdokimov;Reiner Ruser;Franz Buegger;Marc Marx

  • Degradation kinetics of biochar from pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization in temperate soils

    Mo Bai;Burkhard Wilske;Franz Buegger;Jürgen Esperschütz

  • Changes in microbial community structure in soil as a result of different amounts of nitrogen fertilization

    Ilya Yevdokimov;Andreas Gattinger;Franz Buegger;Jean Charles Munch

  • Turnover of grain legume N rhizodeposits and effect of rhizodeposition on the turnover of crop residues

    Jochen Mayer;Franz Buegger;Erik Steen Jensen;Michael Schloter

  • Earthworm Cast Formation and Development: A Shift From Plant Litter to Mineral Associated Organic Matter

    Alix Vidal;Alix Vidal;Francoise Watteau;Laurent Remusat;Carsten W. Mueller

  • Effects of genetically modified starch metabolism in potato plants on photosynthate fluxes into the rhizosphere and on microbial degraders of root exudates.

    Silvia Gschwendtner;Jürgen Esperschütz;Franz Buegger;Michael Reichmann

  • Dynamics of microbial communities during decomposition of litter from pioneering plants in initial soil ecosystems

    J. Esperschütz;C. Zimmermann;A. Dümig;G. Welzl

  • Origin of volatile organic compound emissions from subarctic tundra under global warming

    Andrea Ghirardo;Frida Lindstein;Kerstin Koch;Franz Buegger

  • DNA-based stable isotope probing enables the identification of active bacterial endophytes in potatoes

    Frank Rasche;Tillmann Lueders;Michael Schloter;Sabine Schaefer

  • Ectomycorrhizal impacts on plant nitrogen nutrition: emerging isotopic patterns, latitudinal variation and hidden mechanisms

    Jordan Mayor;Mohammad Bahram;Terry Henkel;Franz Buegger

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Schloter
Michael Schloter Technical University of Munich
Andreas Gattinger
Andreas Gattinger University of Giessen
Jean Charles Munch
Jean Charles Munch Technical University of Munich
Carsten W. Mueller
Carsten W. Mueller University of Copenhagen
Leho Tedersoo
Leho Tedersoo University of Tartu
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
Ingrid Kögel-Knabner Technical University of Munich
Urmas Kõljalg
Urmas Kõljalg University of Tartu
Mohammad Bahram
Mohammad Bahram Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Torsten Müller
Torsten Müller University of Hohenheim
Erik Steen Jensen
Erik Steen Jensen Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, often intersecting with related fields like sociology and social work. For students interested in understanding human-environment interactions, exploring an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into social behaviors, which are crucial for effective environmental policy and advocacy.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise and leadership skills, earning an online Doctor of Education (EdD) can be a strategic move. Programs like online edd no dissertation offer flexible options, helping graduates focus on impactful research or practical applications without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Many educators or environmental program leaders consider seamless progression through advanced education with online eds to edd programs, allowing them to build credentials effectively while balancing work and life commitments.

Additionally, those interested in the social dimensions of environmental justice might find opportunities in fully funded dsw programs. These programs prepare graduates to address community well-being and advocate for sustainable, equitable solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Franz Buegger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles