World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nico P. Dantuma

Nico P. Dantuma

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
20328
World Ranking
18804
National Ranking
296

Nico P. Dantuma publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico P. Dantuma sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 106 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nico P. Dantuma D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico P. Dantuma sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nico P. Dantuma is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and specializes in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, focusing predominantly on Molecular Biology. Their research encompasses several subfields including Epidemiology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Oncology.

Their body of work primarily addresses key topics such as ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, autophagy in disease and therapy, endoplasmic reticulum stress and disease, mitochondrial function and pathology, genetic neurodegenerative diseases, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, and silk-based biomaterials and applications.

Recent notable publications by Nico P. Dantuma include:

  • K63-linked ubiquitylation induces global sequestration of mitochondria, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Reporter-Based Screens for the Ubiquitin/Proteasome System, 2020, Frontiers in Chemistry
  • MacroGreen, a simple tool for detection of ADP-ribosylated proteins, 2021, Communications Biology
  • Cytosolic stress granules relieve the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the nuclear compartment, 2022, The EMBO Journal
  • Functionalization of amyloid fibrils via the Bri2 BRICHOS domain, 2020, Scientific Reports

Their research has appeared frequently in publication venues such as Communications Biology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Autophagy, and Frontiers in Chemistry.

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Nico P. Dantuma's work. Frequent co-authors include Florian A. Salomons, Maria E. Gierisch, Laura K. Herzog, Shanshan Xu, and Tatiana A. Giovannucci.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Short-lived green fluorescent proteins for quantifying ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent proteolysis in living cells

    Nico P. Dantuma;Kristina Lindsten;Rickard Glas;Marianne Jellne

  • VCP/p97 is essential for maturation of ubiquitin-containing autophagosomes and this function is impaired by mutations that cause IBMPFD.

    Emilie Tresse;Florian A. Salomons;Jouni Vesa;Laura C. Bott

  • Aggregate formation inhibits proteasomal degradation of polyglutamine proteins

    Lisette G.G.C. Verhoef;Kristina Lindsten;Maria G. Masucci;Nico P. Dantuma

  • A dynamic ubiquitin equilibrium couples proteasomal activity to chromatin remodeling

    Nico P. Dantuma;Tom A.M. Groothuis;Florian A. Salomons;Jacques Neefjes

  • The ubiquitin-proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: precipitating factor, yet part of the solution.

    Nico P. Dantuma;Laura C. Bott

  • DNA damage triggers nucleotide excision repair-dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2A

    Steven Bergink;Florian A. Salomons;Deborah Hoogstraten;Tom A.M. Groothuis

  • Disease-Associated Prion Protein Oligomers Inhibit the 26S Proteasome

    Mark Kristiansen;Pelagia Deriziotis;Derek E. Dimcheff;Graham S. Jackson

  • The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks

    Klara Acs;Martijn S Luijsterburg;Martijn S Luijsterburg;Leena Ackermann;Florian A Salomons

  • Heterochromatin protein 1 is recruited to various types of DNA damage

    Martijn S. Luijsterburg;Martijn S. Luijsterburg;Christoffel Dinant;Hannes Lans;Jan Stap

  • Neuronal dysfunction in a polyglutamine disease model occurs in the absence of ubiquitin–proteasome system impairment and inversely correlates with the degree of nuclear inclusion formation

    Aaron B. Bowman;Seung-Yun Yoo;Nico P. Dantuma;Huda Y. Zoghbi

  • Endoplasmic reticulum stress compromises the ubiquitin–proteasome system

    Victoria Menéndez-Benito;Lisette G.G.C. Verhoef;Maria G. Masucci;Nico P. Dantuma

  • A transgenic mouse model of the ubiquitin/proteasome system.

    Kristina Lindsten;Victoria Menéndez-Benito;Maria G Masucci;Nico P Dantuma

  • Mutant ubiquitin found in neurodegenerative disorders is a ubiquitin fusion degradation substrate that blocks proteasomal degradation

    Kristina Lindsten;Femke M.S. de Vrij;Lisette G.G.C. Verhoef;David F. Fischer

  • Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response.

    Nico P Dantuma;Haico van Attikum

  • A Fluorescent Broad-Spectrum Proteasome Inhibitor for Labeling Proteasomes In Vitro and In Vivo

    Martijn Verdoes;Bogdan I. Florea;Victoria Menendez-Benito;Christa J. Maynard

  • Functional alterations of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in motor neurons of a mouse model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis†

    Cristina Cheroni;Marianna Marino;Massimo Tortarolo;Pietro Veglianese

  • Nucleotide excision repair-induced H2A ubiquitination is dependent on MDC1 and RNF8 and reveals a universal DNA damage response

    Jurgen A. Marteijn;Simon Bekker-Jensen;Niels Mailand;Hannes Lans

  • The ubiquitin receptor Rad23: at the crossroads of nucleotide excision repair and proteasomal degradation.

    Nico P. Dantuma;Christian Heinen;Deborah Hoogstraten

  • DDB2 promotes chromatin decondensation at UV-induced DNA damage

    Martijn S. Luijsterburg;Martijn S. Luijsterburg;Michael Lindh;Klara Acs;Mischa G. Vrouwe

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria G. Masucci
Maria G. Masucci Karolinska Institute
Jacques Neefjes
Jacques Neefjes Leiden University Medical Center
J. Paul Taylor
J. Paul Taylor St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Haico van Attikum
Haico van Attikum Leiden University Medical Center
Wim Vermeulen
Wim Vermeulen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hilkka Soininen
Hilkka Soininen University of Eastern Finland
Lars Bertram
Lars Bertram University of Lübeck
Jan Konvalinka
Jan Konvalinka Czech Academy of Sciences
Kenneth H. Fischbeck
Kenneth H. Fischbeck National Institutes of Health
Rudolph E. Tanzi
Rudolph E. Tanzi Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to various dynamic online degrees and rewarding health careers in the USA. Many students interested in healthcare can transition rapidly into advanced nursing roles through the shortest online nurse practitioner program, which is designed for those seeking fast, flexible professional advancement.

If you are passionate about nutrition and patient wellness, accelerating your studies is possible via an accelerated nutrition degree online. This may lead to careers in clinical nutrition, dietetics, or public health.

Nursing professionals can further advance by taking advantage of rn to bsn programs, designed to be accessible and flexible for working nurses seeking higher credentials.

Those interested in leadership and administration may opt for an online masters in healthcare management program. This degree empowers science graduates to transition into influential management and policy roles in healthcare.

Each of these pathways offers unique advantages for Biology and Biochemistry students aiming to broaden their career horizons in the growing healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Nico P. Dantuma

Trending Scientists