World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Maxwell Chickering

David Maxwell Chickering

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
21496
World Ranking
3546
National Ranking
1707

David Maxwell Chickering publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Maxwell Chickering sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Maxwell Chickering D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Maxwell Chickering sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Maxwell Chickering is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their career is primarily based in the United States, where they engage in research activities connected to this leading technology organization.

Information on their recent papers, including titles, year of publication, and venues, is not available. Similarly, no data about frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications has been documented.

Their research areas, including main fields of study, subfields, and primary topics, are not listed in the available data. Likewise, there are no records of awards won or year-specific honors attributed to their work.

This profile is based solely on the verified affiliation and geographical location, without available detail on specific academic contributions or scientific output.

Best Publications

  • Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data

    David Heckerman;Dan Geiger;David M. Chickering

  • Optimal structure identification with greedy search

    David Maxwell Chickering

  • Learning Bayesian Networks is NP-Complete

    David Maxwell Chickering

  • Learning equivalence classes of bayesian-network structures

    David Maxwell Chickering

  • Large-Sample Learning of Bayesian Networks is NP-Hard

    David Maxwell Chickering;David Heckerman;Christopher Meek

  • Dependency networks for inference, collaborative filtering, and data visualization

    David Heckerman;David Maxwell Chickering;Christopher Meek;Robert Rounthwaite

  • Systems and methods for allocating placement of content items on a rendered page based upon bid value

    David Chickering;Christopher Meek;David Heckerman;Brian Burdick

  • Collaborative filtering utilizing a belief network

    David E. Heckerman;John S. Breese;Eric Horvitz;David Maxwell Chickering

  • A Bayesian approach to learning Bayesian networks with local structure

    David Maxwell Chickering;David Heckerman;Christopher Meek

  • Apparatus and accompanying methods for visualizing clusters of data and hierarchical cluster classifications

    David E. Heckerman;Paul S. Bradley;David M. Chickering;Christopher A. Meek

  • Efficient Approximations for the MarginalLikelihood of Bayesian Networks with Hidden Variables

    David Maxwell Chickering;David Heckerman

  • A transformational characterization of equivalent Bayesian network structures

    David Maxwell Chickering

  • Using predictive user models for language modeling on a personal device with user behavior models based on statistical modeling

    Timothy S. Paek;David M. Chickering

  • Mixtures of bayesian networks

    Bo Thiesson;Christopher A. Meek;David Maxwell Chickering;David Earl Heckerman

  • ModelTracker: Redesigning Performance Analysis Tools for Machine Learning

    Saleema Amershi;Max Chickering;Steven M. Drucker;Bongshin Lee

  • Here or There

    Ben Carterette;Paul N. Bennett;David Maxwell Chickering;Susan T. Dumais

  • Here or there: preference judgments for relevance

    Ben Carterette;Paul N. Bennett;David Maxwell Chickering;Susan T. Dumais

  • Method and system for visualization of clusters and classifications

    David E. Heckerman;David Maxwell Chickering;Usama M. Fayyad;Christopher A. Meek

  • Using temporal data for making recommendations

    Andrew Zimdars;David Maxwell Chickering;Christopher Meek

  • Dialog repair based on discrepancies between user model predictions and speech recognition results

    Timothy S. Paek;David M. Chickering

  • Large-sample learning of bayesian networks is NP-hard

    David Maxwell Chickering;Christopher Meek;David Heckerman

  • Preference Judgments for Relevance

    Ben Carterette;Paul N. Bennett;David Maxwell Chickering;Susan T. Dumais

Frequent Co-Authors

David Heckerman
David Heckerman Microsoft (United States)
Christopher A. Meek
Christopher A. Meek Microsoft (United States)
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Robert L. Rounthwaite
Robert L. Rounthwaite Microsoft (United States)
Kamal Jain
Kamal Jain Microsoft (United States)
Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
Lili Cheng
Lili Cheng Microsoft (United States)
Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Paul N. Bennett
Paul N. Bennett Microsoft (United States)
Dan Geiger
Dan Geiger Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in computer science opens doors to many online degree options. For those looking to quickly jumpstart their careers, associate degrees offer a fast, practical foundation in computing and IT—making them a great starting point before transferring to a bachelor’s program or entering the workforce.

If affordability is a concern, you’ll find many reputable schools prioritizing accessible tuition. Professionals aspiring to leadership or academic roles may be interested in the cheapest online edd programs no gre—providing advanced credentials without the traditional barriers, like GRE requirements or high costs.

When choosing a program, ensure it’s from the most respected online university to maximize your degree’s recognition with employers. Specialized paths, such as video game design, are also increasingly popular. Discover the flexibility and career potential of an online video game design degree as a way to blend creativity with technology.

Best Scientists Citing David Maxwell Chickering

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles