World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
21842
World Ranking
9014
National Ranking
554

Charles Blundell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Blundell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 75 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Charles Blundell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Blundell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles Blundell is a researcher affiliated with DeepMind in the United Kingdom. Their work spans the domain of computer science with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and its applications.

The main fields of study for Charles Blundell include:

  • Computer Science

Within computer science, their research emphasizes several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Geometry and Topology
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

Charles Blundell's research covers a range of topics such as:

  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Topic Modeling
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Their publication record includes papers in notable venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Representation Theory of the American Mathematical Society
  • Machine Learning Science and Technology

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Charles Blundell include:

  • Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI, 2021, Nature
  • Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmark, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A model of egocentric to allocentric understanding in mammalian brains, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PonderNet: Learning to Ponder, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Charles Blundell include:

  • Petar Veličković
  • Andrea Banino
  • Adrià Puigdomènech Badia
  • Lars Buesing
  • Borja Ibarz

Best Publications

  • Matching networks for one shot learning

    Oriol Vinyals;Charles Blundell;Timothy Lillicrap;Koray Kavukcuoglu

  • Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles

    Balaji Lakshminarayanan;Alexander Pritzel;Charles Blundell

  • Weight Uncertainty in Neural Network

    Charles Blundell;Julien Cornebise;Koray Kavukcuoglu;Daan Wierstra

  • Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networks

    Charles Blundell;Julien Cornebise;Koray Kavukcuoglu;Daan Wierstra

  • Deep exploration via bootstrapped DQN

    Ian Osband;Charles Blundell;Alexander Pritzel;Benjamin Van Roy

  • PathNet: Evolution Channels Gradient Descent in Super Neural Networks

    Chrisantha Fernando;Dylan Banarse;Charles Blundell;Yori Zwols

  • Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents

    Andrea Banino;Caswell Barry;Benigno Uria;Charles Blundell

  • Reinforcement Learning, Fast and Slow.

    Matthew Botvinick;Sam Ritter;Jane X. Wang;Zeb Kurth-Nelson

  • Noisy Networks For Exploration

    Meire Fortunato;Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar;Bilal Piot;Jacob Menick

  • Learning to reinforcement learn

    Jane X. Wang;Zeb Kurth-Nelson;Dhruva Tirumala;Hubert Soyer

  • Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI.

    Alex Davies;Petar Veličković;Lars Buesing;Sam Blackwell

  • DARLA: improving zero-shot transfer in reinforcement learning

    Irina Higgins;Arka Pal;Andrei Rusu;Loic Matthey

  • Deep AutoRegressive Networks

    Karol Gregor;Ivo Danihelka;Andriy Mnih;Charles Blundell

  • Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmark

    Adrià Puigdomenech Badia;Bilal Piot;Steven Kapturowski;Pablo Sprechmann

  • Modelling Reciprocating Relationships with Hawkes Processes

    Charles Blundell;Jeff Beck;Katherine A. Heller

  • Neural Episodic Control

    Alexander Pritzel;Benigno Uria;Sriram Srinivasan;Adrià Puigdomènech Badia

  • Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmark

    Adrià Puigdomènech Badia;Bilal Piot;Steven Kapturowski;Pablo Sprechmann

  • Model-Free Episodic Control

    Charles Blundell;Benigno Uria;Alexander Pritzel;Yazhe Li

  • Bayesian Recurrent Neural Networks

    Meire Fortunato;Charles Blundell;Oriol Vinyals

  • Computations Underlying Social Hierarchy Learning: Distinct Neural Mechanisms for Updating and Representing Self-Relevant Information.

    Dharshan Kumaran;Dharshan Kumaran;Andrea Banino;Charles Blundell;Demis Hassabis

  • Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration Strategies

    Adrià Puigdomènech Badia;Pablo Sprechmann;Alex Vitvitskyi;Daniel Guo

  • Representation Learning via Invariant Causal Mechanisms

    Jovana Mitrovic;Brian McWilliams;Jacob C Walker;Lars Holger Buesing

Frequent Co-Authors

Demis Hassabis
Demis Hassabis Google (United States)
Yee Whye Teh
Yee Whye Teh University of Oxford
Daan Wierstra
Daan Wierstra DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Matthew Botvinick
Matthew Botvinick Yale University
Razvan Pascanu
Razvan Pascanu DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Oriol Vinyals
Oriol Vinyals DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Dharshan Kumaran
Dharshan Kumaran Google (United States)
Katherine A. Heller
Katherine A. Heller Google (United States)
Koray Kavukcuoglu
Koray Kavukcuoglu DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Michael C. Mozer
Michael C. Mozer Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a Computer Science degree? The field offers many online alternatives that can broaden your skill set and career options. For those interested in fundamental sciences, a bachelor of science in physics online provides analytical and problem-solving foundations valuable in tech careers.

Data-driven roles are in high demand, making the cheapest data science masters in usa a smart investment for career changers or upskillers. Electrical engineering is another core discipline driving innovation. An online master’s in electrical engineering degree can complement computer science skills in areas like embedded systems and hardware design.

If you prefer a quicker path to employment or want to boost your qualifications, consider certificate programs that pay well. These programs can provide job-ready skills without years of study.

By exploring these related online degrees and career pathways, you can tailor your learning to fit your ambitions and the changing needs of the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Blundell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles