World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
16428
World Ranking
3384
National Ranking
1640

Michael C. Mozer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael C. Mozer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael C. Mozer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael C. Mozer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael C. Mozer is affiliated with Google in the United States and has an extensive research record in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their work spans multiple subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Cognitive Neuroscience, among others.

The scientist's research topics exhibit significant breadth, covering Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Neural Networks and Applications, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Topic Modeling, Advanced Graph Neural Networks, and Machine Learning and Data Classification.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Neural Networks Trained on Natural Scenes Exhibit Gestalt Closure (2021), Computational Brain & Behavior
  • SAVi++: Towards End-to-End Object-Centric Learning from Real-World Videos (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • von Mises-Fisher Loss: An Exploration of Embedding Geometries for Supervised Learning (2021), 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimation (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Learning to Combine Top-Down and Bottom-Up Signals in Recurrent Neural Networks with Attention over Modules (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)

Michael C. Mozer has coauthored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators. Among these are Anirudh Goyal, Yoshua Bengio, Alex Lamb, Nan Rosemary Ke, and Tyler R. Scott.

The scientist's work has been published predominantly in arXiv (Cornell University), with over 50 publications, as well as in venues such as Nature Communications, Computational Brain & Behavior, the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), and Cognitive Science.

Best Publications

  • Bayesian community-wide culture-independent microbial source tracking

    Dan Knights;Justin Kuczynski;Emily S. Charlson;Jesse Zaneveld

  • Skeletonization: A Technique for Trimming the Fat from a Network via Relevance Assessment

    Michael C. Mozer;Paul Smolensky

  • The Neural Network House: An Environment that Adapts to its Inhabitants

    Michael C. Mozer

  • Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians.

    Robert V. Lindsey;Aaron Daluiski;Sumit Chopra;Alexander Lachapelle

  • Predicting subscriber dissatisfaction and improving retention in the wireless telecommunications industry

    M.C. Mozer;R. Wolniewicz;D.B. Grimes;E. Johnson

  • Neural net architectures for temporal sequence processing

    Michael C. Mozer

  • Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications.

    Nicholas J Cepeda;Noriko Coburn;Doug Rohrer;John T Wixted

  • Using Relevance to Reduce Network Size Automatically

    Michael C. Mozer;Paul Smolensky

  • An Intelligent Environment Must Be Adaptive

    M.C. Mozer

  • The Perception of Multiple Objects: A Connectionist Approach

    Michael C. Mozer

  • Optimizing classifier performance via an approximation to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic

    Lian Yan;Robert Dodier;Michael C. Mozer;Richard Wolniewicz

  • Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model

    Marlene Behrmann;Richard S. Zemel;Michael C. Mozer

  • Improving Students’ Long-Term Knowledge Retention Through Personalized Review

    Robert V. Lindsey;Jeffery D. Shroyer;Harold Pashler;Michael C. Mozer

  • Neural network music composition by prediction: exploring the benefits of psychoacoustic constraints and multi-scale processing

    Michael C. Mozer

  • Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5

    Richard S Zemel;Christopher Williams;Michael C Mozer

  • Lessons from an Adaptive Home

    Michael C. Mozer

  • Induction of Multiscale Temporal Structure

    Michael C Mozer

  • A Focused Backpropagation Algorithm for Temporal Pattern Recognition.

    Michael C. Mozer

  • Evidence-based static branch prediction using machine learning

    Brad Calder;Dirk Grunwald;Michael Jones;Donald Lindsay

  • How Deep is Knowledge Tracing

    Mohammad Khajah;Robert V. Lindsey;Michael C. Mozer

  • Learning to generate images with perceptual similarity metrics

    Jake Snell;Karl Ridgeway;Renjie Liao;Brett D. Roads

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Richard S. Zemel
Richard S. Zemel University of Toronto
Yoshua Bengio
Yoshua Bengio University of Montreal
Paul Smolensky
Paul Smolensky Microsoft (United States)
Marlene Behrmann
Marlene Behrmann Carnegie Mellon University
Sepp Hochreiter
Sepp Hochreiter Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Shaun P. Vecera
Shaun P. Vecera University of Iowa
Dan Knights
Dan Knights University of Minnesota
Samy Bengio
Samy Bengio Apple (United States)
Tim Curran
Tim Curran University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open up diverse educational and career opportunities. Many students explore best degrees for the future to ensure their qualifications are in high demand. Computer Science consistently ranks among top choices, but related majors such as Data Science, Cybersecurity, and Software Engineering are also excellent options to consider.

For those interested in advancing quickly, students often look for what is the easiest masters degree within technology and related disciplines. These programs can offer streamlined curricula, letting you boost your credentials without an extensive time commitment.

If affordability is a priority, exploring the cheapest doctoral programs in Computer Science and its allied fields can help you achieve advanced qualifications without incurring significant debt. Many online programs now offer flexible, cost-effective paths to a doctorate.

Finally, if you're considering an education-focused trajectory, there are shortest edd program online options available. These fast-track programs are ideal for those looking to move quickly into leadership roles in education, technology policy, or curriculum development.

Best Scientists Citing Michael C. Mozer

Trending Scientists