World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geert M.J. Ramakers

Geert M.J. Ramakers

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5629
World Ranking
9163
National Ranking
250

Geert M.J. Ramakers publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert M.J. Ramakers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Geert M.J. Ramakers D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert M.J. Ramakers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geert M.J. Ramakers is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work encompasses several key topics, including:

  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Geert M.J. Ramakers has contributed to multiple publications, frequently collaborating with co-authors such as Roger A.H. Adan, A. Maryse Minnaard, Louk J. M. J. Vanderschuren, Heidi M. B. Lesscher, and Johanna A. S. Smeets.

The scientist's research has appeared consistently in several publication venues, notably:

  • Psychopharmacology
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Behavioural Pharmacology

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Cue and Reward Evoked Dopamine Activity Is Necessary for Maintaining Learned Pavlovian Associations" (2021, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "On the interrelation between alcohol addiction-like behaviors in rats" (2022, Psychopharmacology)
  • "Baclofen and naltrexone, but not N-acetylcysteine, affect voluntary alcohol drinking in rats regardless of individual levels of alcohol intake" (2020, Behavioural Pharmacology)
  • "Increased elasticity of sucrose demand during hyperdopaminergic states in rats" (2022, Psychopharmacology)
  • "Seeking under threat of adversity: assessing control over reward pursuit in rats" (2024, Psychopharmacology)

The work is positioned at the intersection of experimental neuroscience and pharmacology, addressing mechanisms of receptor signaling and their influence on behaviors related to addiction, reward, and psychiatric conditions. This aligns with their focus on substance use disorders, alcohol consumption, and compulsive behaviors.

Best Publications

  • Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

    Janna Marie Hoogendam;Geert M.J. Ramakers;Vincenzo Di Lazzaro

  • Insulin signaling in the central nervous system: learning to survive.

    Lars P. van der Heide;Geert M.J. Ramakers;Marten P. Smidt

  • Place learning and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

    Biessels Gj;Kamal A;Ramakers Gm;Urban Ij

  • Insulin modulates hippocampal activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor and phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase-dependent manner.

    Lars P. Van Der Heide;Amer Kamal;Alain Artola;Willem Hendrik Gispen

  • Absence of Ret signaling in mice causes progressive and late degeneration of the nigrostriatal system.

    Edgar R Kramer;Liviu Aron;Geert M. J Ramakers;Sabine Seitz

  • A postsynaptic transient K+ current modulated by arachidonic acid regulates synaptic integration and threshold for LTP induction in hippocampal pyramidal cells

    Geert M. J. Ramakers;Johan F. Storm

  • Effects of streptozotocin‐diabetes on the hippocampal NMDA receptor complex in rats

    F. Gardoni;A. Kamal;C. Bellone;G. J. Biessels

  • Slow progressive degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons in postnatal Engrailed mutant mice.

    Paola Sgadò;Lavinia Albéri;Daniel Gherbassi;Sherri L. Galasso

  • Neonatal exposure to brominated flame retardant BDE-47 reduces long-term potentiation and postsynaptic protein levels in mouse hippocampus.

    Milou M.L. Dingemans;Geert M.J. Ramakers;Fabrizio Gardoni;Regina G.D.M. van Kleef

  • Diabetes mellitus concomitantly facilitates the induction of long‐term depression and inhibits that of long‐term potentiation in hippocampus

    A. Artola;A. Kamal;G. M. J. Ramakers;G. J. Biessels

  • Temporal differences in the phosphorylation state of pre- and postsynaptic protein kinase C substrates B-50/GAP-43 and neurogranin during long term potentiation

    Geert M.J. Ramakers;Pierre N.E. De Graan;Ivan J.A. Urban;Dick Kraay

  • Long-term potentiation and synaptic protein phosphorylation

    P. Pasinelli;G.M.J. Ramakers;I.J.A. Urban;J.J.H. Hens

  • Synaptic transmission changes in the pyramidal cells of the hippocampus in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in rats.

    Amer Kamal;Geert-Jan Biessels;Willem Hendrik Gispen;Geert M.J. Ramakers

  • Protein kinase C in synaptic plasticity: changes in the in situ phosphorylation state of identified pre- and postsynaptic substrates

    Geert M.J. Ramakers;Piera Pasinelli;Jacques J.H. Hens;Willem Hendrik Gispen

  • Neutral antagonism at the cannabinoid 1 receptor: a safer treatment for obesity

    F J Meye;V Trezza;L J M J Vanderschuren;G M J Ramakers

  • Social isolation stress reduces hippocampal long-term potentiation: effect of animal strain and involvement of glucocorticoid receptors.

    A. Kamal;G.M.J. Ramakers;B. Altinbilek;M.J.H. Kas

  • Differential changes in the phosphorylation of the protein kinase C substrates myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate and growth-associated protein-43/B-50 following Schaffer collateral long-term potentiation and long-term depression.

    G. M. J. Ramakers;R. K. Mcnamara;R. H. Lenox;P. N. E. De Graan

  • Modulation of cue-induced firing of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons by leptin and ghrelin

    G van der Plasse;R van Zessen;M C M Luijendijk;H Erkan

  • Increased GABAergic input to ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons associated with decreased cocaine reinforcement in μ-opioid receptor knockout mice

    D.S. Mathon;H.M.B. Lesscher;M.A.F.M. Gerrits;A. Kamal

  • Hyperinsulinemia in rats causes impairment of spatial memory and learning with defects in hippocampal synaptic plasticity by involvement of postsynaptic mechanisms.

    Amer Kamal;Amer Kamal;Geert M. J. Ramakers;Willem Hendrik Gispen;Geert Jan Biessels

Frequent Co-Authors

Marten P. Smidt
Marten P. Smidt University of Amsterdam
Geert Jan Biessels
Geert Jan Biessels Utrecht University
W.H. Gispen
W.H. Gispen Utrecht University
Roger A.H. Adan
Roger A.H. Adan Utrecht University
Berry M. Spruijt
Berry M. Spruijt Utrecht University
Fabrizio Gardoni
Fabrizio Gardoni University of Milan
Martien J H Kas
Martien J H Kas University of Groningen
R. Jeroen Pasterkamp
R. Jeroen Pasterkamp Utrecht University
John E. Pintar
John E. Pintar Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are several online educational pathways to consider. Enrolling in an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited program may help you earn your credentials more quickly and flexibly, which is ideal for students balancing work or family commitments.

When choosing a major or degree, it’s also important to consider future earning potential. Neuroscience ties into fields that are often listed among the highest paying degrees and the highest paying majors. This ensures your hard work translates into strong career prospects after graduation.

For those concerned about affordability, look for accredited online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions make it easier to access federal financial aid, helping you minimize student debt as you pursue your Neuroscience goals online.

Best Scientists Citing Geert M.J. Ramakers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles