World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6636 6369 518 500 119 9964

Tamsin C. O'Connell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tamsin C. O'Connell between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tamsin C. O'Connell published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2016. 11 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2016. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tamsin C. O'Connell: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 0
2004 4
2005 4
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 9
2010 3
2011 6
2012 10
2013 4
2014 7
2015 13
2016 16
2017 8
2018 6
2019 6
2020 6
2021 5
2022 3
2023 4
2024 6
2025 5
Total 140
Download as CSV

Tamsin C. O'Connell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamsin C. O'Connell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 119 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 119
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Tamsin C. O'Connell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamsin C. O'Connell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Tamsin C. O'Connell is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on subfields including Paleontology, Genetics, Ecology, Archaeology, and Geography, Planning and Development.

Their scientific contributions cover a range of topics such as Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies, Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies, Forensic and Genetic Research, Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research, and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Tamsin C. O'Connell include:

  • Genetic history of Cambridgeshire before and after the Black Death, 2024, Science Advances
  • Isotope data from amino acids indicate Darwin's ground sloth was not an herbivore, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Lipid residues in pottery from the Indus Civilisation in northwest India, 2020, Journal of Archaeological Science
  • Feeding the herds: Stable isotope analysis of animal diet and its implication for understanding social organisation in the Indus Civilisation, Northwest India, 2020, Archaeological Research in Asia
  • Crop water status from plant stable carbon isotope values: A test case for monsoonal climates, 2021, The Holocene

Tamsin C. O'Connell frequently publishes in outlets such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Archaeological Science, PLoS ONE, Nature Human Behaviour, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include:

  • Sarah A. Inskip
  • Craig Cessford
  • Alice Rose
  • John Robb
  • Cameron A. Petrie

Best Publications

  • Collagen turnover in the adult femoral mid‐shaft: Modeled from anthropogenic radiocarbon tracer measurements

    Robert E.M. Hedges;John G. Clement;C. David L. Thomas;Tamsin C. O'Connell;Tamsin C. O'Connell

  • Nitrogen balance and δ15N: why you're not what you eat during nutritional stress

    Benjamin T. Fuller;James L. Fuller;Nancy E. Sage;David A. Harris

  • The diet-body offset in human nitrogen isotopic values: A controlled dietary study

    T.C. O'Connell;C.J. Kneale;N. Tasevska;G.G.C. Kuhnle;G.G.C. Kuhnle

  • Investigations into the effect of diet on modern human hair isotopic values.

    T.C. O'Connell;R.E.M. Hedges

  • Isotopic Comparison of Hair, Nail and Bone: Modern Analyses

    T.C. O'Connell;R.E.M. Hedges;M.A. Healey;A.H.R.W. Simpson

  • Nitrogen balance and δ15N: why you're not what you eat during pregnancy

    Benjamin T. Fuller;James L. Fuller;Nancy E. Sage;David A. Harris

  • Ancient Hybridization and an Irish Origin for the Modern Polar Bear Matriline

    Ceiridwen J. Edwards;Marc A. Suchard;Philippe Lemey;John J. Welch

  • Documenting the diet in ancient human populations through stable isotope analysis of hair.

    Stephen A. Macko;Michael H. Engel;Vladimir Andrusevich;Gert Lubec

  • Interpreting the expansion of sea fishing in medieval Europe using stable isotope analysis of archaeological cod bones

    James H. Barrett;David Orton;Cluny Johnstone;Jennifer Harland

  • Stable Isotope Analysis of Human and Faunal Remains from the Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Berinsfield, Oxfordshire: Dietary and Social Implications

    Karen L. Privat;Tamsin C. O'connell;Michael P. Richards

  • On the Use of Biomineral Oxygen Isotope Data to Identify Human Migrants in the Archaeological Record: Intra-Sample Variation, Statistical Methods and Geographical Considerations.

    Emma Lightfoot;Tamsin C. O’Connell

  • Isotopic Comparison of Hair and Bone: Archaeological Analyses

    T.C. O’Connell;R.E.M. Hedges

  • ‘Trophic’ and ‘source’ amino acids in trophic estimation: a likely metabolic explanation

    Tamsin O'Connell

  • Ancient mitochondrial DNA from hair.

    M.Thomas P Gilbert;M.Thomas P Gilbert;Andrew S Wilson;Michael Bunce;Anders J Hansen

  • Trans-Atlantic Slavery: Isotopic Evidence for Forced Migration to Barbados

    Hannes Schroeder;Tamsin C. O'Connell;Jane A. Evans;Kristrina A. Shuler

  • Stable isotopic evidence for diet at the Imperial Roman coastal site of Velia (1st and 2nd Centuries AD) in Southern Italy

    Oliver E. Craig;Marco Biazzo;Tamsin C. O'Connell;Peter Garnsey

  • The distinction between freshwater- and terrestrial-based diets: methodological concerns and archaeological applications of sulphur stable isotope analysis

    Karen L. Privat;Tamsin C. O'Connell;Robert E.M. Hedges

  • Ancient human parallel lineages within North America contributed to a coastal expansion

    Unknown

  • The earliest evidence of millet as a staple crop: New light on neolithic foodways in North China

    Xinyi Liu;Martin K. Jones;Martin K. Jones;Zhijun Zhao;Guoxiang Liu

  • Hydrogen isotope ratios in animal body protein reflect trophic level

    Jennifer Birchall;Tamsin C. O'connell;Tamsin C. O'connell;Tim H. E. Heaton;Robert E. M. Hedges

  • Sex-specific foraging strategies and resource partitioning in the southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina).

    Rebecca Lewis;Tamsin C O'Connell;Tamsin C O'Connell;Mirtha Lewis;Claudio Campagna;Claudio Campagna

  • From necessity to choice: dietary revolutions in west China in the second millennium BC

    Xinyi Liu;Emma Lightfoot;Tamsin C. O’Connell;Hui Wang

  • Diet and mobility in early medieval bavaria: a study of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes.

    Susanne Hakenbeck;Ellen McManus;Hans Geisler;Gisela Grupe

  • New chronology for Ksâr 'Akil (Lebanon) supports Levantine route of modern human dispersal into Europe

    Marjolein D. Bosch;Marcello A. Mannino;Amy L. Prendergast;Tamsin C. O’Connell

  • Research data supporting: "On the Use of Biomineral Oxygen Isotope Data to Identify Human Migrants in the Archaeological Record: Intra-Sample Variation, Statistical Methods and Geographical Considerations"

    Emma Lightfoot;Tamsin C. O'Connell

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme Barker
Graeme Barker University of Cambridge
Gunter G.C. Kuhnle
Gunter G.C. Kuhnle University of Reading
Jean-Jacques Hublin
Jean-Jacques Hublin Collège de France
Johannes van der Plicht
Johannes van der Plicht University of Groningen
Paola Iacumin
Paola Iacumin University of Parma
Chris Hunt
Chris Hunt Liverpool John Moores University
Frank P. Wesselingh
Frank P. Wesselingh Naturalis Biodiversity Center
Matthew J. Collins
Matthew J. Collins University of Cambridge
Christopher J. Howe
Christopher J. Howe University of Cambridge
Nita G. Forouhi
Nita G. Forouhi University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and skill sets. Many students start with cheapest online general studies degree programs to gain foundational knowledge affordably before specializing.

If you prefer a more straightforward entry into higher education, some options are known as the easiest bachelors degree programs, offering a smoother academic path while still preparing you for environmental roles.

Specialized fields like geology are closely linked to Environmental Sciences, making a geology online degree a valuable choice for studying earth processes and environmental impact assessment.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental data analysis. Many learners pursue degrees through renowned colleges with GIS programs to develop expert skills in mapping, spatial data management, and environmental modeling.

Best Scientists Citing Tamsin C. O'Connell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles