World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 38 10100 9814 128 128 195 7559

Vanessa Evers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vanessa Evers between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vanessa Evers published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 9 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
1977 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vanessa Evers: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 4
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 10
2009 16
2010 12
2011 14
2012 18
2013 17
2014 12
2015 15
2016 13
2017 15
2018 9
2019 8
2020 10
2021 7
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
2025 5
Total 211
Download as CSV

Vanessa Evers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vanessa Evers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 195 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 195
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Vanessa Evers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vanessa Evers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 38
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Vanessa Evers is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. Their research spans several fields including psychology, computer science, and neuroscience, with a focus on intersecting areas such as social psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics of their work cover a range of areas related to human-robot interaction and developmental research. These include:

  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Vanessa Evers has contributed to numerous publications across prominent venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Evers encompass studies mainly from 2020 and 2021, such as:

  • Differences in Spontaneous Interactions of Autistic Children in an Interaction With an Adult and Humanoid Robot, 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • Making Appearances, 2020, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Words of encouragement: how praise delivered by a social robot changes children's mindset for learning, 2020, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
  • "I See What You Did There", 2021, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Predictable Robots for Autistic Children-Variance in Robot Behaviour, Idiosyncrasies in Autistic Children's Characteristics, and Child-Robot Engagement, 2021, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Collaboration forms a significant aspect of their research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Khiet P. Truong
  • Bob R. Schadenberg
  • Dennis Reidsma
  • Thomas Beelen
  • Roeland Ordelman

Best Publications

  • Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model

    Marcel Heerink;Ben J. A. Kröse;Vanessa Evers;Bob J. Wielinga

  • The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender

    Henriette Cramer;Vanessa Evers;Satyan Ramlal;Maarten Someren

  • The Role of Culture in Interface Acceptance

    Vanessa Evers;Donald Day

  • Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit

    Marcel Heerink;Ben Krose;Vanessa Evers;Bob Wielinga

  • SPENCER: A Socially Aware Service Robot for Passenger Guidance and Help in Busy Airports

    Rudolph Triebel;Kai Oliver Arras;Rachid Alami;Lucas Beyer

  • Machine Ethics: The Design and Governance of Ethical AI and Autonomous Systems

    Alan F. Winfield;Katina Michael;Jeremy Pitt;Vanessa Evers

  • Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people

    Marcel Heerink;Ben Kröse;Bob Wielinga;Vanessa Evers

  • The Influence of a Robot's Social Abilities on Acceptance by Elderly Users

    Marcel Heerink;Ben Krose;Vanessa Evers;Bob Wielinga

  • When in Rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations

    Lin Wang;Pei-Luen Patrick Rau;Vanessa Evers;Benjamin Krisper Robinson

  • Relational vs. group self-construal: untangling the role of national culture in HRI

    Vanessa Evers;Heidy C. Maldonado;Talia L. Brodecki;Pamela J. Hinds

  • Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users

    M. Heerink;B.J.A. Kröse;B.J. Wielinga;V. Evers

  • Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot

    Marcel Heerink;Ben Kröse;Vanessa Evers;Bob Wielinga

  • What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality

    Michiel Joosse;Manja Lohse;Jorge Gallego Perez;Vanessa Evers

  • Influence of social presence on acceptance of an assistive social robot and screen agent by elderly users

    Marcel Heerink;Ben J. A. Kröse;Vanessa Evers;Bob J. Wielinga

  • Towards Speech Emotion Recognition "in the wild" using Aggregated Corpora and Deep Multi-Task Learning

    Jaebok Kim;Gwenn Englebienne;Khiet P. Truong;Vanessa Evers

  • VR-OOM: Virtual Reality On-rOad driving siMulation

    David Goedicke;Jamy Li;Vanessa Evers;Wendy Ju

  • ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people's responses to embodied social agents

    Henriette Cramer;Nicander Kemper;Alia Amin;Bob Wielinga

  • Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language

    Stephanie Embgen;Matthias Luber;Christian Becker-Asano;Marco Ragni

  • Cultural aspects of user interface understanding : an empirical evaluation of an e-learning website by international user groups

    Vanessa Evers

  • Human-Robot User Studies in Eldercare: Lessons Learned

    M. Heerink;B.J.A. Kröse;B.J. Wielinga;V. Evers

  • Don't stand so close to me: users' attitudinal and behavioral responses to personal space invasion by robots

    Aziez Sardar;Michiel Joosse;Astrid Weiss;Vanessa Evers

Frequent Co-Authors

Bob Wielinga
Bob Wielinga University of Amsterdam
Ben Kröse
Ben Kröse Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
Dirk Heylen
Dirk Heylen University of Twente
Frans C. A. Groen
Frans C. A. Groen University of Amsterdam
Tony J. Prescott
Tony J. Prescott University of Sheffield
Maja Pantic
Maja Pantic Imperial College London
Elizabeth Pellicano
Elizabeth Pellicano University College London
Paul F. M. J. Verschure
Paul F. M. J. Verschure Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Roger K. Moore
Roger K. Moore University of Sheffield
Pamela J. Hinds
Pamela J. Hinds Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Computer Science? There are several flexible pathways beyond traditional campus study. Many students now start with 1 year associate degree programs online, which offer a fast, affordable entry into the field and can help jump-start your tech career.

For those seeking advanced opportunities, pursuing one of the most in demand masters degrees can provide access to high-paying roles and industry leadership positions. Online programs make it easier than ever to work while you further your education.

Cost is a concern for many. Luckily, there are a range of affordable online degree programs available, helping you minimize student debt while gaining valuable credentials in Computer Science or related fields.

Worried about past academic performance? Some best online colleges that accept low gpa can provide you with a second chance to pursue your dreams. No matter your background, there are flexible online options to fit your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Vanessa Evers

Trending Scientists