World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
11812
World Ranking
2961
National Ranking
1161

David J. Stensrud publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Stensrud sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 191 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

David J. Stensrud D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Stensrud sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Stensrud is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a specific focus on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Environmental Engineering, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies

David J. Stensrud has published extensively in multiple academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Monthly Weather Review
  • Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by Stensrud feature research on various aspects of meteorology and atmospheric sciences, such as:

  • "Challenges and Opportunities in Numerical Weather Prediction" (2023), published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of Assimilating a Network of Ground-Based Remote Sensing Profilers for Forecasts of Nocturnal Convection Initiation during PECAN" (2020), published in Monthly Weather Review
  • "The Orinoco Low-Level Jet: An Investigation of Its Mechanisms of Formation Using the WRF Model" (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Correlation Structures between Satellite All-Sky Infrared Brightness Temperatures and the Atmospheric State at Storm Scales" (2021), published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
  • "Benefits of the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) for Ensemble-Based Analysis and Prediction of Severe Thunderstorms" (2020), published in Monthly Weather Review

Throughout their career, Stensrud has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Yunji Zhang
  • Matthew R. Kumjian
  • Braedon C. Stouffer
  • Eugene E. Clothiaux
  • C. Lyn Comer

Best Publications

  • Parameterization Schemes: Keys to Understanding Numerical Weather Prediction Models

    David J. Stensrud

  • Using Initial Condition and Model Physics Perturbations in Short-Range Ensemble Simulations of Mesoscale Convective Systems

    David J. Stensrud;Jian Wen Bao;Thomas T. Warner

  • Importance of Low-Level Jets to Climate: A Review.

    David J. Stensrud

  • Convective-scale warn-on-forecast system: A vision for 2020

    David J. Stensrud;Ming Xue;Louis J. Wicker;Kevin E. Kelleher

  • Parameterization Schemes: Soil–vegetation–atmosphere parameterizations

    Unknown

  • Observed Effects of Landscape Variability on Convective Clouds

    Robert M. Rabin;Steven Stadler;Peter J. Wetzel;David J. Stensrud

  • Using Ensembles for Short-Range Forecasting

    David J. Stensrud;Harold E. Brooks;Jun Du;M. Steven Tracton

  • Progress and challenges with Warn-on-Forecast

    David J. Stensrud;Louis J. Wicker;Ming Xue;Daniel T. Dawson;Daniel T. Dawson

  • Assimilation of Reflectivity Data in a Convective-Scale, Cycled 3DVAR Framework with Hydrometeor Classification

    Jidong Gao;David J. Stensrud

  • Model Climatology of the Mexican Monsoon

    David J. Stensrud;Robert L. Gall;Steven L. Mullen;Kenneth W. Howard

  • Toward Improved Prediction: High-Resolution and Ensemble Modeling Systems in Operations

    Paul J. Roebber;David M. Schultz;Brian A. Colle;David J. Stensrud

  • Effects of Upper-Level Shear on the Structure and Maintenance of Strong Quasi-Linear Mesoscale Convective Systems

    Michael C. Coniglio;David J. Stensrud;Louis J. Wicker

  • Surges over the Gulf of California during the Mexican Monsoon

    David J. Stensrud;Robert L. Gall;Mel K. Nordquist

  • Evaluation of a Short-Range Multimodel Ensemble System

    Matthew S. Wandishin;Steven L. Mullen;David J. Stensrud;Harold E. Brooks

  • Probabilistic Precipitation Forecast Skill as a Function of Ensemble Size and Spatial Scale in a Convection-Allowing Ensemble

    Adam J. Clark;John S. Kain;David J. Stensrud;Ming Xue

  • Surface Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Approach with Initial Condition and Model Physics Uncertainties

    Tadashi Fujita;David J. Stensrud;David C. Dowell

  • Surface Characteristics of Observed Cold Pools

    Nicholas A. Engerer;David J. Stensrud;Michael C. Coniglio

  • Climatology of Heavy Rain Events in the United States from Hourly Precipitation Observations

    Harold E. Brooks;David J. Stensrud

  • An Observational Study of Derecho-Producing Convective Systems

    Michael C. Coniglio;David J. Stensrud;Michael B. Richman

  • The Ensemble Kalman Filter Analyses and Forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm Using Single- and Double-Moment Microphysics Schemes

    Nusrat Yussouf;Edward R. Mansell;Louis J. Wicker;Dustan M. Wheatley

  • Numerical diagnosis of a small, quasi-tropical cyclone over the western Mediterranean: Dynamical vs. boundary factors

    V. Homar;R. Romero;D. J. Stensrud;C. Ramis

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold E. Brooks
Harold E. Brooks National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ming Xue
Ming Xue University of Oklahoma
David M. Schultz
David M. Schultz University of Manchester
J. Michael Fritsch
J. Michael Fritsch Pennsylvania State University
Lance M. Leslie
Lance M. Leslie University of Technology Sydney
Thomas T. Warner
Thomas T. Warner National Center for Atmospheric Research
Charles A. Doswell
Charles A. Doswell University of Oklahoma
Patrick Minnis
Patrick Minnis Langley Research Center
Brian A. Colle
Brian A. Colle Stony Brook University
Dusan S. Zrnic
Dusan S. Zrnic National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis and resource management. Students interested in technical skills can explore the best gis schools that offer specialized programs online, providing flexibility while equipping learners with spatial data expertise.

For those drawn to leadership and policy development in environmental contexts, pursuing a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is an excellent choice. Several programs allow completion in a short time frame, and you can find the 1 year mpa online designed for professionals seeking to fast-track their administrative careers in government and nonprofits.

Understanding social dynamics is also vital when addressing environmental issues. An online degree in sociology offers insights into community behavior, sustainability, and social justice. The best online bachelor degree in sociology programs provide a strong foundation for students aiming to impact social aspects of environmental work.

Lastly, professionals interested in advancing education or leadership within environmental organizations may consider doctoral studies. Flexible options like online edd no dissertation programs offer advanced credentials without the traditional dissertation hurdle, making it easier to complete while balancing work and life.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Stensrud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles