World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 49 14947 13465 328 311 165 7494

Paul A. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul A. Smith between 1995 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul A. Smith published across 30 years, from 1995 to 2024, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 2 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1995 2024

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul A. Smith: publications per year, 1995 to 2024
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 4
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 5
2008 5
2009 7
2010 11
2011 16
2012 10
2013 13
2014 14
2015 13
2016 15
2017 9
2018 11
2019 16
2020 11
2021 6
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
Total 193
Download as CSV

Paul A. Smith publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 165 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 165
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul A. Smith D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 49
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul A. Smith is affiliated with the Australian Wine Research Institute in Australia. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on Food Science, Plant Science, Sensory Systems, Biochemistry, and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management.

The main topics covered in Paul A. Smith's work include:

  • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Wine Industry and Tourism
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Publications by Paul A. Smith have been frequently featured in several academic journals. The venues with the most publications are:

  • Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research (5 publications)
  • Food Hydrocolloids (4 publications)
  • Foods (2 publications)
  • Carbon (1 publication)
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 publication)

Among the recent papers associated with Paul A. Smith are:

  • Oxygen functionalized porous activated biocarbons with high surface area derived from grape marc for enhanced capture of CO2 at elevated-pressure (2020) published in Carbon
  • Astringency sub-qualities drying and pucker are driven by tannin and pH - Insights from sensory and tribology of a model wine system (2020) published in Food Hydrocolloids
  • Tribology and QCM-D approaches provide mechanistic insights into red wine mouthfeel, astringency sub-qualities and the role of saliva (2021) published in Food Hydrocolloids
  • Effect of dissolved carbon dioxide on the sensory properties of still white and red wines (2020) published in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
  • Comparison of water addition and early-harvest strategies to decrease alcohol concentration in Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz wine: impact on wine phenolics, tannin composition and colour properties (2020) published in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Frequent collaborators working with Paul A. Smith include:

  • Keren A. Bindon (8 joint works)
  • Shaoyang Wang (5 joint works)
  • Sandra M. Olarte Mantilla (5 joint works)
  • Jason R. Stokes (5 joint works)
  • Heather E. Smyth (5 joint works)

Best Publications

  • Quantification of condensed tannins by precipitation with methyl cellulose: development and validation of an optimised tool for grape and wine analysis

    C.J. Sarneckis;C.J. Sarneckis;R.G. Dambergs;R.G. Dambergs;P. Jones;P. Jones;M. Mercurio;M. Mercurio

  • High throughput analysis of red wine and grape phenolics-adaptation and validation of methyl cellulose precipitable tannin assay and modified Somers color assay to a rapid 96 well plate format.

    Meagan D. Mercurio;Robert G. Dambergs;Markus J. Herderich;Paul A. Smith

  • Predicting Human Drug Glucuronidation Parameters: Application of In Vitro and In Silico Modeling Approaches

    John O Miners;Paul A Smith;Michael J Sorich;Ross A McKinnon

  • Multivariate data analysis applied to spectroscopy: Potential application to juice and fruit quality

    D. Cozzolino;W.U. Cynkar;N. Shah;P. Smith

  • Interaction between grape-derived proanthocyanidins and cell wall material. 1. Effect on proanthocyanidin composition and molecular mass.

    Keren A. Bindon;Paul A. Smith;James A. Kennedy

  • Wine Protein Haze: Mechanisms of Formation and Advances in Prevention

    Steven C. Van Sluyter;Steven C. Van Sluyter;Steven C. Van Sluyter;Jacqui M. McRae;Robert J. Falconer;Paul A. Smith

  • Classification of Tempranillo wines according to geographic origin: Combination of mass spectrometry based electronic nose and chemometrics

    Wies Cynkar;Robert Dambergs;Paul Smith;Daniel Cozzolino

  • Interaction between grape-derived proanthocyanidins and cell wall material. 2. Implications for vinification.

    Keren A. Bindon;Paul A. Smith;Helen Holt;James A. Kennedy

  • Analysis of grape and wine tannins: Methods, applications and challenges

    M.J. Herderich;P.A. Smith

  • Tannin Quantification in Red Grapes and Wine: Comparison of Polysaccharide- and Protein-Based Tannin Precipitation Techniques and Their Ability to Model Wine Astringency

    Meagan D Mercurio;Paul A Smith

  • Comparison of linear and nonlinear classification algorithms for the prediction of drug and chemical metabolism by human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms.

    Michael J. Sorich;John O. Miners;Ross A. McKinnon;David A. Winkler

  • Mid infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis: a tool to discriminate between organic and non-organic wines grown in Australia

    Daniel Cozzolino;Matt Holdstock;Robert G. Dambergs;Wies U. Cynkar

  • Relationship between red wine grades and phenolics.1. tannin and total phenolics concentrations

    Meagan D Mercurio;Robert G Dambergs;Daniel Cozzolino;Markus J Herderich

  • Impact of winemaking practices on the concentration and composition of tannins in red wine

    P.A. Smith;P.A. Smith;J.M. McRae;K.A. Bindon

  • Degradation of white wine haze proteins by Aspergillopepsin I and II during juice flash pasteurization.

    Matteo Marangon;Steven C. Van Sluyter;Steven C. Van Sluyter;Ella M.C. Robinson;Richard A. Muhlack

  • Factors affecting skin tannin extractability in ripening grapes.

    Keren A Bindon;S Hadi Madani;Phillip Pendleton;Paul A Smith

  • Measurement of condensed tannins and dry matter in red grape homogenates using near infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares.

    Daniel Cozzolino;Wies U Cynkar;Robert G Dambergs;Meagan D Mercurio

  • Can spectroscopy geographically classify Sauvignon Blanc wines from Australia and New Zealand

    D. Cozzolino;W.U. Cynkar;N. Shah;P.A. Smith

  • A brief introduction to multivariate methods in grape and wine analysis

    Daniel Cozzolino;W.U. Cynkar;N Shah;R.G. Dambergs

  • Phenolic compositions of 50 and 30 year sequences of Australian red wines: the impact of wine age

    Jacqui M McRae;Robert G Dambergs;Robert G Dambergs;Stella Kassara;Mango Parker

  • Pharmacophore and Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Modeling: Complementary Approaches for the Rationalization and Prediction of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A4 Substrate Selectivity

    Paul A. Smith;Michael J. Sorich;Ross A. Mckinnon;John O. Miners

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Cozzolino
Daniel Cozzolino University of Queensland
Markus Herderich
Markus Herderich Australian Wine Research Institute
John O. Miners
John O. Miners Flinders University
Krasimir Vasilev
Krasimir Vasilev University of South Australia
James A. Kennedy
James A. Kennedy Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
David A. Winkler
David A. Winkler La Trobe University
Peter I. Mackenzie
Peter I. Mackenzie Flinders University
Jason R. Stokes
Jason R. Stokes University of Queensland
Paul K. Boss
Paul K. Boss Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Isak S. Pretorius
Isak S. Pretorius Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various related fields and career pathways that often begin with specific educational routes. For those interested in transitioning to law enforcement support roles, pursuing the best online associates in criminal justice can provide foundational knowledge and practical skills for entry-level positions.

Another potential avenue is the legal sector, where understanding the salary prospects is crucial. Individuals aiming to become paralegals can benefit from insights into paralegal salary ranges to make informed decisions about their education and career investments.

For those drawn to the pharmaceutical industry, roles such as pharmaceutical sales representatives offer dynamic career opportunities. Understanding how much do drug reps make is vital for gauging the financial potential in this career path.

Meanwhile, becoming a pharmacist requires a comprehensive educational journey. Prospective students should look into pharmacist education requirements to prepare adequately for this respected profession in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles