World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jana Safrankova

Jana Safrankova

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
5958
World Ranking
8091
National Ranking
28

Jana Safrankova publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Safrankova sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 512 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jana Safrankova D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Safrankova sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jana Safrankova is affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic and has contributed extensively to the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a particular focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics. Their scholarly output includes a significant number of publications spanning multiple subfields and research topics.

Safrankova's research encompasses a diverse set of main topics, including:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis

Their recent publications highlight contributions to understanding space plasma phenomena, heliospheric magnetic fields, and planetary boundary models. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Pre-flight Calibration and Near-Earth Commissioning Results of the Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment (MPPE) Onboard MMO (Mio)" (2021), published in Space Science Reviews
  • "Turbulence Upstream and Downstream of Interplanetary Shocks" (2021), published in Frontiers in Physics
  • "What is the Solar Wind Frame of Reference?" (2020), published in The Astrophysical Journal
  • "Evolution of Magnetic Field Fluctuations and Their Spectral Properties within the Heliosphere: Statistical Approach" (2023), published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • "Martian Bow Shock and Magnetic Pileup Boundary Models Based on an Automated Region Identification" (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Safrankova has frequently collaborated with several researchers, reflecting an active engagement in collaborative scientific research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Zdeněk Němeček
  • F. Němec
  • Gilbert Pi
  • Alexander Pitňa
  • Tereza Ďurovcová

Their work appears regularly in prominent publication venues such as:

  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • Atmosphere
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets

Overall, Safrankova's research contributes to the understanding of dynamic processes in space environments, planetary atmospheres, and plasma interactions within the heliosphere. Their expertise bridges several intersecting domains in space and planetary sciences supported by extensive publication records and collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive study of the magnetospheric response to a hot flow anomaly

    D. G. Sibeck;N. L. Borodkova;S. J. Schwartz;C. J. Owen

  • Transient flux enhancements in the magnetosheath

    Z. Němeček;J. Šafránková;L. Přech;D. G. Sibeck

  • Small scale observation of magnetopause motion: preliminary results of the INTERBALL project

    J. Safrankova;G. Zastenker;Z. Nemecek;A. Fedorov

  • Fast Solar Wind Monitor (BMSW): Description and First Results

    Jana Šafránková;Zdeněk Němeček;Lubomír Přech;Georgy Zastenker

  • A new approach to magnetopause and bow shock modeling based on automated region identification

    K. Jelínek;Z. Němeček;J. Šafránková

  • Ion kinetic scale in the solar wind observed.

    Jana Šafránková;Zdeněk Němeček;Lubomír Přech;Georgy N. Zastenker

  • Improved bow shock model with dependence on the IMF strength

    M. Jeřáb;Z. Němeček;J. Šafránková;K. Jelínek

  • Magnetopause Expansions for Quasi-Radial Interplanetary Magnetic Field: THEMIS and GEOTAIL Observations

    A. V. Suvorova;A. V. Suvorova;J.-H. Shue;A. V. Dmitriev;A. V. Dmitriev;D. G. Sibeck

  • Super fast plasma streams as drivers of transient and anomalous magnetospheric dynamics

    S. Savin;E. Amata;L. Zelenyi;V. Lutsenko

  • The magnetopause shape and location: a comparison of the Interball and Geotail observations with models

    J. Šafránková;Z. Nĕmeček;Š. Dušík;L. Přech

  • Numerical MHD modeling of propagation of interplanetary shock through the magnetosheath

    A. A. Samsonov;Z. Němeček;J. Šafránková

  • Earth's bow shock and magnetopause in the case of a field-aligned upstream flow: Observation and model comparison

    J. Merka;J. Merka;A. Szabo;J. Šafránková;Z. Němeček

  • IMF cone angle control of the magnetopause location: Statistical study

    Š. Dušík;G. Granko;J. Šafránková;Z. Němeček

  • High energy jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath: Implications for plasma dynamics and anomalous transport

    S. Savin;E. Amata;L. Zelenyi;V. Budaev

  • Dusty Plasma Effects in Near Earth Space and Interplanetary Medium

    Ingrid Mann;Asta Pellinen-Wannberg;Edmond Murad;Olga Popova

  • Magnetopause motion driven by interplanetary magnetic field variations

    D. G. Sibeck;K. Kudela;R. P. Lepping;R. Lin

  • SOLAR WIND DENSITY SPECTRA AROUND THE ION SPECTRAL BREAK

    J. Šafránková;Z. Němeček;F. Němec;L. Přech

  • Multispacecraft measurements of plasma and magnetic field variations in the magnetosheath: Comparison with Spreiter models and motion of the structures

    G.N. Zastenker;M.N. Nozdrachev;Z. Němeček;J. Šafránková

  • Analysis of the 3-D shape of the terrestrial bow shock by interball/magion 4 observations

    M.I. Verigin;G.A. Kotova;J. Slavin;A. Szabo

  • POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY OF FLUCTUATIONS OF BULK AND THERMAL SPEEDS IN THE SOLAR WIND

    J. Šafránková;Z. Němeček;F. Němec;L. Přech

  • Interball tail probe measurements in outer cusp and boundary layers

    S. P. Savin;N. L. Borodkova;E. Yu. Budnik;A. O. Fedorov

  • High and low frequency large amplitude variations of plasma and magnetic field in the magnetosheath: Radial profile and some features

    N.N Shevyrev;G.N Zastenker;M.N Nozdrachev;Z Němeček

  • Cusp-like plasma in high altitudes: a statistical study of the width and location of the cusp from Magion-4

    J. Mĕrka;J. Šafránková;Z. Nĕmeček

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Sibeck
David G. Sibeck Goddard Space Flight Center
J. A. Sauvaud
J. A. Sauvaud Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ronald P. Lepping
Ronald P. Lepping Goddard Space Flight Center
Michel Parrot
Michel Parrot Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Susumu Kokubun
Susumu Kokubun Nagoya University
Rickard Lundin
Rickard Lundin Swedish Institute of Space Physics
J. P. McFadden
J. P. McFadden University of California, Berkeley
Christopher T. Russell
Christopher T. Russell University of California, Los Angeles
Howard J. Singer
Howard J. Singer National Weather Service
William S. Kurth
William S. Kurth University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide additional skills and broaden career opportunities. Many learners prioritize affordability, making an affordable online general studies degree an attractive option for balancing cost with education in complementary subjects.

Another consideration for some students is program difficulty and workload. An easy bachelor's degree might offer a less intensive path, which can be helpful for those balancing other responsibilities or seeking foundational knowledge before specializing further.

Specialized degrees such as a geologist degree online are excellent for those interested in earth sciences and fieldwork, linking well with environmental conservation careers. Meanwhile, technical skills in spatial data analysis can be developed through the best GIS schools, which prepare graduates for roles managing geographic information systems critical to environmental planning and management.

Choosing the right program depends on your career goals, learning style, and budget. Combining Environmental Sciences with these related degrees can enhance employability and impact in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Jana Safrankova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles