World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6566 6339 216 207 154 7077

Jan Benick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Benick between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Benick published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 9 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
2008 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Benick: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 6
2009 5
2010 13
2011 9
2012 10
2013 9
2014 15
2015 20
2016 9
2017 20
2018 10
2019 4
2020 7
2021 7
2022 3
2023 4
2024 4
2025 5
Total 160
Download as CSV

Jan Benick publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Benick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 154 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457 154
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Benick D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Benick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Benick is affiliated with the Fraunhofer Society in Germany and works primarily within the field of Engineering, with a focus on Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Their research also spans related subfields such as Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Their work concentrates on topics including Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies, Semiconductor materials and interfaces, Semiconductor materials and devices, Thin-Film Transistor Technologies, solar cell performance optimization, Nanowire Synthesis and Applications, and Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence.

Benick has contributed to several recent publications across leading journals in the field. Some notable papers include:

  • Design rules for high-efficiency both-sides-contacted silicon solar cells with balanced charge carrier transport and recombination losses, 2021, Nature Energy
  • Two-terminal III-V//Si triple-junction solar cell with power conversion efficiency of 35.9% at AM1.5g, 2021, Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications
  • Two-Terminal Direct Wafer-Bonded GaInP/AlGaAs//Si Triple-Junction Solar Cell with AM1.5g Efficiency of 34.1%, 2020, Solar RRL
  • Epitaxial GaInP/GaAs/Si Triple-Junction Solar Cell with 25.9% AM1.5g Efficiency Enabled by Transparent Metamorphic AlxGa1−xAsyP1−y Step-Graded Buffer Structures, 2021, Solar RRL
  • III-V//CuxIn1−yGaySe2 multijunction solar cells with 27.2% efficiency fabricated using modified smart stack technology with Pd nanoparticle array and adhesive material, 2021, Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications

Frequent publication venues for Benick include:

  • Solar RRL
  • Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications
  • Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
  • SiliconPV Conference Proceedings
  • Nature Energy

Benick's collaborations have involved several researchers with whom they have published repeatedly. Key frequent co-authors include:

  • Armin Richter
  • Christian Reichel
  • Martin Hermle
  • Stefan W. Glunz
  • Ralph Müller

The combination of research topics and selected publication venues indicates Benick's focus on the advancement of solar cell technologies, particularly in silicon-based and multi-junction solar cells, as well as the underlying semiconductor materials and device engineering required for improving solar energy conversion efficiencies.

Best Publications

  • n-Type Si solar cells with passivating electron contact: Identifying sources for efficiency limitations by wafer thickness and resistivity variation

    Armin Richter;Jan Benick;Frank Feldmann;Frank Feldmann;Andreas Fell

  • High efficiency n-type Si solar cells on Al2O3-passivated boron emitters

    Jan Benick;Bram Hoex;M. C. M. van de Sanden;W. M. M. Kessels

  • Design rules for high-efficiency both-sides-contacted silicon solar cells with balanced charge carrier transport and recombination losses

    Armin Richter;Ralph Müller;Jan Benick;Frank Feldmann

  • Very low surface recombination velocity on p-type c-Si by high-rate plasma-deposited aluminum oxide

    Pierre Saint-Cast;Daniel Kania;Marc Hofmann;Jan Benick

  • III–V-on-silicon solar cells reaching 33% photoconversion efficiency in two-terminal configuration

    Romain Cariou;Romain Cariou;Jan Benick;Frank Feldmann;Frank Feldmann;Oliver Höhn

  • Tunnel oxide passivated carrier-selective contacts based on ultra-thin SiO2 layers

    Anamaria Moldovan;Frank Feldmann;Martin Zimmer;Jochen Rentsch

  • High-Efficiency c-Si Solar Cells Passivated With ALD and PECVD Aluminum Oxide

    Pierre Saint-Cast;Jan Benick;Daniel Kania;Lucas Weiss

  • High-Efficiency n-Type HP mc Silicon Solar Cells

    Jan Benick;Armin Richter;Ralph Muller;Hubert Hauser

  • The Irresistible Charm of a Simple Current Flow Pattern – 25% with a Solar Cell Featuring a Full-Area Back Contact

    M. Hermle;J. Benick;H. Steinkemper;C. Reichel

  • Fabrication of GaInP/GaAs//Si Solar Cells by Surface Activated Direct Wafer Bonding

    Karen Derendorf;Stephanie Essig;Eduard Oliva;Vera Klinger

  • Four-junction spectral beam-splitting photovoltaic receiver with high optical efficiency

    Bernhard Mitchell;Gerhard Peharz;Gerald Siefer;Marius Peters

  • Thermal stability of the Al2O3 passivation on p-type silicon surfaces for solar cell applications

    Jan Benick;Armin Richter;Martin Hermle;Stefan W. Glunz

  • Monolithic Two-Terminal III–V//Si Triple-Junction Solar Cells With 30.2% Efficiency Under 1-Sun AM1.5g

    Romain Cariou;Jan Benick;Paul Beutel;Nasser Razek

  • Excellent silicon surface passivation with 5 Å thin ALD Al2O3 layers: Influence of different thermal post‐deposition treatments

    Armin Richter;Jan Benick;Martin Hermle;Stefan W. Glunz

  • Tunnel oxide passivating electron contacts as full-area rear emitter of high-efficiency p-type silicon solar cells

    Armin Richter;Jan Benick;Ralph Müller;Ralph Müller;Frank Feldmann;Frank Feldmann

  • Wafer-Bonded GaInP/GaAs//Si Solar Cells With 30% Efficiency Under Concentrated Sunlight

    Stephanie Essig;Jan Benick;Michael Schachtner;Alexander Wekkeli

  • Boron Emitter Passivation With Al $_{f 2}$ O $_{f 3}$ and Al $_{f 2}$ O $_{f 3}$ /SiN $_{m x}$ Stacks Using ALD Al $_{f 2}$ O $_{f 3}$

    A. Richter;J. Benick;M. Hermle

  • Two‐terminal III–V//Si triple‐junction solar cell with power conversion efficiency of 35.9 % at AM1.5g

    Patrick Schygulla;Ralph Müller;David Lackner;Oliver Höhn

  • n-type black silicon solar cells

    Päivikki Repo;Jan Benick;Ville Vähänissi;Jonas Schön

  • HIGH-EFFICIENCY N-TYPE SILICON SOLAR CELLS WITH FRONT SIDE BORON EMITTER

    J Benick;B Bram Hoex;G Gijs Dingemans;Wmm Erwin Kessels

  • Industrially Feasible Rear Passivation and Contacting Scheme for High-Efficiency n-Type Solar Cells Yielding a $V_{ m oc}$ of 700 mV

    Dominik Suwito;Ulrich Jäger;Jan Benick;Stefan Janz

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Hermle
Martin Hermle Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems
Stefan W. Glunz
Stefan W. Glunz Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems
Armin Richter
Armin Richter Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems
Frank Dimroth
Frank Dimroth Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems
Martin C. Schubert
Martin C. Schubert Fraunhofer Society
Andreas W. Bett
Andreas W. Bett Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems
Gerald Siefer
Gerald Siefer Fraunhofer Society
Ralph Müller
Ralph Müller ETH Zurich
Jan Christoph Goldschmidt
Jan Christoph Goldschmidt Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems
Wilhelm Warta
Wilhelm Warta Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Engineering and Technology education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with a range of online degree options unlocking new career opportunities. Innovative programs, such as those offered in crypto degree studies, empower students to enter cutting-edge fields like blockchain and fintech, which are in high demand globally.

Students interested in incorporating technology into sports can explore the best online sports management degrees, which blend management principles with emerging tech skills. Urban development is another growing sector—an online degree urban planning offers a flexible way to prepare for roles in smart city planning and sustainable design.

For those looking to accelerate their careers, there are options like the 6 month masters degree programs which help professionals quickly upskill for in-demand tech roles. By exploring these pathways, students can find online degrees tailored to their interests—helping them keep pace with the fast-changing world of Engineering and Technology.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Benick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles