World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
13137
World Ranking
3156
National Ranking
1470

Corey T. McMillan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corey T. McMillan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 365 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Corey T. McMillan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corey T. McMillan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Corey T. McMillan is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Neurology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their recent publications include impactful papers across prominent journals and venues in neuroscience and related disciplines. Notable works encompass:

  • "TDP-43 loss and ALS-risk SNPs drive mis-splicing and depletion of UNC13A," 2022, published in Nature
  • "Distribution patterns of tau pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy," 2020, published in Acta Neuropathologica
  • "Disentangling Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Using Data-Driven Methods," 2020, published in Biological Psychiatry
  • "Autosomal dominant VCP hypomorph mutation impairs disaggregation of PHF-tau," 2020, published in Science
  • "International Multicenter Analysis of Brain Structure Across Clinical Stages of Parkinson's Disease," 2021, published in Movement Disorders

Their collaboration network includes frequent coauthors such as David J. Irwin, David A. Wolk, Murray Grossman, Edward B. Lee, and Lauren Massimo. These collaborations indicate interdisciplinary engagement within neurology and neuroscience research communities.

McMillan's research contributions are widely disseminated through several publication venues where they have multiple papers, notably:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Brain

Their principal research topics span key areas of neurological disease and brain function, including:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

This distribution of research areas reflects a focus on understanding neurodegenerative diseases, their mechanisms, diagnostics, and potential therapeutic approaches. The studies encompass both clinical-stage analyses and molecular pathology insights, contributing to the knowledge base in neuroscience and neurology.

Best Publications

  • Neurodegenerative disease concomitant proteinopathies are prevalent, age-related and APOE4-associated

    John L Robinson;Edward B Lee;Sharon X Xie;Lior Rennert

  • Genome-wide Analyses Identify KIF5A as a Novel ALS Gene.

    Aude Nicolas;Kevin P. Kenna;Alan E. Renton;Alan E. Renton;Nicola Ticozzi

  • Distribution patterns of tau pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy

    Gabor G. Kovacs;Gabor G. Kovacs;Gabor G. Kovacs;Milica Jecmenica Lukic;Milica Jecmenica Lukic;David J. Irwin;Thomas Arzberger

  • What's in a Name: Voxel-Based Morphometric Analyses of MRI and Naming Difficulty in Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia and Corticobasal Degeneration.

    Murray Grossman;Corey McMillan;Peachie Moore;Lijun Ding

  • Age at symptom onset and death and disease duration in genetic frontotemporal dementia: an international retrospective cohort study.

    Katrina M. Moore;Jennifer Nicholas;Murray Grossman;Corey T. McMillan

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: defining phenotypic diversity through personalized medicine

    David J. Irwin;Nigel J. Cairns;Murray Grossman;Corey T. McMillan

  • Deep clinical and neuropathological phenotyping of Pick disease.

    David J. Irwin;Johannes Brettschneider;Corey T. McMillan;Felicia Cooper

  • Cognitive decline and reduced survival in C9orf72 expansion frontotemporal degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    David J. Irwin;Corey T. McMillan;Johannes Brettschneider;Johannes Brettschneider;David J. Libon;David J. Libon

  • 18F-flortaucipir tau positron emission tomography distinguishes established progressive supranuclear palsy from controls and Parkinson disease: A multicenter study

    Daniel R. Schonhaut;Daniel R. Schonhaut;Daniel R. Schonhaut;Corey T. McMillan;Salvatore Spina;Bradford C. Dickerson

  • Differentiating primary progressive aphasias in a brief sample of connected speech

    Sharon Ash;Emily Evans;Jessica O'Shea;John Powers

  • Non-Fluent Speech in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

    Sharon Ash;Peachie Moore;Luisa Vesely;Delani Gunawardena

  • Hypermethylation of repeat expanded C9orf72 is a clinical and molecular disease modifier

    Jenny Russ;Elaine Y. Liu;Kathryn Wu;Donald Neal

  • Disentangling Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Using Data-Driven Methods.

    Mohamad Habes;Michel J. Grothe;Birkan Tunc;Corey McMillan

  • Pathological combinations in neurodegenerative disease are heterogeneous and disease-associated

    Unknown

  • Clinical marker for Alzheimer disease pathology in logopenic primary progressive aphasia

    Lucia A.A. Giannini;David J. Irwin;Corey T. McMillan;Sharon Ash

  • The neural basis for categorization in semantic memory.

    Murray Grossman;Edward E. Smith;Phyllis Koenig;Guila Glosser

  • Speech errors in progressive non-fluent aphasia.

    Sharon Ash;Corey McMillan;Delani Gunawardena;Brian Avants

  • Cognitive and Pathological Influences of Tau Pathology in Lewy Body Disorders

    David Coughlin;Sharon X. Xie;Mendy Liang;Andrew Williams

  • Neurocognitive contributions to verbal fluency deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    D. J. Libon;C. McMillan;D. Gunawardena;C. Powers

  • Autosomal dominant VCP hypomorph mutation impairs disaggregation of PHF-tau.

    Nabil F. Darwich;Jessica M. Phan;Boram Kim;EunRan Suh

  • Sentence comprehension and voxel-based morphometry in progressive nonfluent aphasia, semantic dementia, and nonaphasic frontotemporal dementia

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Vanessa Troiani;James Gee;Peachie Moore

  • Dissociable patterns of brain activity during comprehension of rapid and syntactically complex speech: evidence from fMRI.

    Jonathan E. Peelle;Corey McMillan;Peachie Moore;Murray Grossman

  • Why are patients with progressive nonfluent aphasia nonfluent

    D. Gunawardena;S. Ash;C. McMillan;B. Avants

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
David J. Irwin
David J. Irwin University of Pennsylvania
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
David A. Wolk
David A. Wolk University of Pennsylvania
Vivianna M. Van Deerlin
Vivianna M. Van Deerlin University of Pennsylvania
James C. Gee
James C. Gee University of Pennsylvania
Edward B. Lee
Edward B. Lee University of Pennsylvania
Virginia M.-Y. Lee
Virginia M.-Y. Lee University of Pennsylvania
Brian B. Avants
Brian B. Avants University of Virginia
Peachie Moore
Peachie Moore University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Corey T. McMillan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles