World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carlo H. R. Heip

Carlo H. R. Heip

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 71 1303 16 218 19308

Carlo H. R. Heip publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carlo H. R. Heip between 1972 and 2013, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carlo H. R. Heip published across 42 years, from 1972 to 2013, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2002. 10 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2013. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2002. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 5 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 6 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications
1972 2013

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carlo H. R. Heip: publications per year, 1972 to 2013
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 5
1975 1
1976 3
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 1
1981 3
1982 5
1983 6
1984 6
1985 4
1986 5
1987 2
1988 7
1989 1
1990 6
1991 3
1992 11
1993 2
1994 0
1995 7
1996 6
1997 3
1998 6
1999 6
2000 9
2001 9
2002 16
2003 15
2004 8
2005 8
2006 9
2007 3
2008 5
2009 11
2010 5
2011 8
2012 5
2013 5
Total 222
Download as CSV

Carlo H. R. Heip publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo H. R. Heip sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 217–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 218 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124 218
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Carlo H. R. Heip D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo H. R. Heip sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68 71
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Oceanography

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Oceanography, Benthic zone, Ecology, Biomass and North sea. His Oceanography research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Organic matter and Fauna. His research in Benthic zone intersects with topics in Hydrology, Intertidal zone, Canonical correspondence analysis and Polyhaline.

The Biomass study combines topics in areas such as Benthos, Salinity, Estuary, Indicator species and Trophic level. His Trophic level research includes elements of Total organic carbon and Detritus. His study in Phytodetritus is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Carbon cycle, Botany and Meiobenthos.

His most cited work include:

  • Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos (309 citations)
  • Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe (202 citations)
  • A New Index Measuring Evenness (199 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Oceanography, Ecology, Meiobenthos, Benthic zone and Marine biodiversity. His Oceanography study frequently involves adjacent topics like Fishery. His Meiobenthos study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Continental shelf, Copepod and Brackish water.

His Benthic zone research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Organic matter, Total organic carbon and Fauna. His work focuses on many connections between Marine biodiversity and other disciplines, such as Aquatic biodiversity research, that overlap with his field of interest in Ecosystem services. His work carried out in the field of Biomass brings together such families of science as Trophic level and Crustacean.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Oceanography (40.63%)
  • Ecology (37.50%)
  • Meiobenthos (20.83%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2001-2011)?

  • Ecology (37.50%)
  • Oceanography (40.63%)
  • Marine biodiversity (12.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

C.H.R. Heip mainly focuses on Ecology, Oceanography, Marine biodiversity, Benthic zone and Environmental resource management. His work in Biodiversity, Habitat, Plankton, Phytoplankton and Nutrient are all subfields of Ecology research. His Meiobenthos, Deep sea, Estuary and Macrobenthos study, which is part of a larger body of work in Oceanography, is frequently linked to Silt, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His Estuary research includes themes of Hydrology, Ecology, Salinity and Intertidal zone. His research integrates issues of Environmental planning, Aquatic biodiversity research and Environmental protection in his study of Marine biodiversity. His studies deal with areas such as Organic matter and Fauna as well as Benthic zone.

Between 2001 and 2011, his most popular works were:

  • Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe (202 citations)
  • Effect of ocean acidification on the early life stages of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis (182 citations)
  • Similar rapid response to phytodetritus deposition in shallow and deep-sea sediments (105 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Oceanography

Benthic zone, Oceanography, Ecology, Hydrology and Estuary are his primary areas of study. In the field of Benthic zone, his study on Benthos overlaps with subjects such as Orange roughy. His Oceanography study incorporates themes from Environmental chemistry and Organic matter.

C.H.R. Heip combines subjects such as Salinity, Polyhaline and Nutrient with his study of Hydrology. His Salinity research incorporates themes from Biomass, Phytoplankton and Indicator species. C.H.R. Heip has researched Estuary in several fields, including Sediment transport and Bioturbation.

Best Publications

  • Essential biodiversity variables

    H M Pereira;S Ferrier;M Walters;G N Geller

  • Impact of elevated CO2 on shellfish calcification

    Frédéric Gazeau;Christophe Quiblier;Jeroen M. Jansen;Jean‐Pierre Gattuso;Jean‐Pierre Gattuso

  • Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea

    Filip J.R. Meysman;Jack J. Middelburg;Carlo H.R. Heip

  • The fate of intertidal microphytobenthos carbon: An in situ 13C-labeling study

    Jack J. Middelburg;Christiane Barranguet;Henricus T. S. Boschker;Peter M. J. Herman

  • Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos

    P.M.J. Herman;J.J. Middelburg;J. van de Koppel;C.H.R. Heip

  • Linking diagenetic alteration of amino acids and bulk organic matter reactivity

    Birgit Dauwe;Jack J. Middelburg;Peter M. J. Herman;Carlo H. R. Heip

  • Indices of diversity and evenness

    C.H.R. Heip;P.M.J. Herman;K.E.R. Soetaert

  • Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study

    Jack J. Middelburg;Karline Soetaert;Peter M. J. Herman;Carlo H. R. Heip

  • Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe

    T. Ysebaert;P.M.J. Herman;P. Meire;J.A.M. Craeymeersch

  • A New Index Measuring Evenness

    C. Heip

  • Stable isotopes' as trophic tracers: combining field sampling and manipulative labelling of food resources for macrobenthos

    Peter M. J. Herman;Jack J. Middelburg;John Widdows;Cathy H. Lucas

  • Do alternate stable states occur in natural ecosystems?: Evidence from a tidal flat

    Johan van de Koppel;Peter M. J. Herman;Pauline Thoolen;Carlo H. R. Heip

  • Effect of ocean acidification on the early life stages of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis

    F.P.H. Gazeau;J.P. Gattuso;C. Dawber;A.E. Pronker

  • Community structure and bioturbation potential of macrofauna at four North Sea stations with contrasting food supply

    B. Dauwe;P.M.J. Herman;C.H.R. Heip

  • Benthic community structure and sediment processes on an intertidal flat: results from the ECOFLAT project

    Peter M.J. Herman;Jack J. Middelburg;Carlo H.R. Heip

  • Long-term change in dissolved inorganic nutrients in the heterotrophic Scheldt estuary (Belgium, The Netherlands)

    Karline Soetaert;Jack J. Middelburg;Carlo Heip;Patrick Meire

  • Ecological significance of benthic foraminifera: 13C labelling experiments

    L. Moodley;H.T.S. Boschker;J.J. Middelburg;R. Pel

  • Bacteria and Foraminifera: key players in a short-term deep-sea benthic response to phytodetritus

    Leon Moodley;Jack J. Middelburg;Hendricus T. S. Boschker;Gerard C. A. Duineveld

  • Nematode Assemblages of Deep-Sea and Shelf Break Sites in the North-Atlantic and Mediterranean-Sea

    K.E.R. Soetaert;C.H.R. Heip

  • The benthic infauna of the North Sea: species distribution and assemblages

    A. Künitzer;D. Basford;J.A. Craeymeersch;J.-M. Dewarumez

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. J. Herman
Peter M. J. Herman Delft University of Technology
Jack J. Middelburg
Jack J. Middelburg Utrecht University
Karline Soetaert
Karline Soetaert Utrecht University
Magda Vincx
Magda Vincx Ghent University
Gerard C.A. Duineveld
Gerard C.A. Duineveld Utrecht University
Jean-Pierre Gattuso
Jean-Pierre Gattuso Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Christos Arvanitidis
Christos Arvanitidis Hellenic Centre for Marine Research
Maria Włodarska-Kowalczuk
Maria Włodarska-Kowalczuk Polish Academy of Sciences
Paul J. Somerfield
Paul J. Somerfield Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Frédéric Gazeau
Frédéric Gazeau Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse career opportunities across science, education, and health. As the demand for flexible learning grows, more students are choosing online degrees to begin or advance their careers.

For those interested in the psychological aspects of human-environment interactions, online clinical psychology programs offer insight into mental health – a vital skill for positions in conservation, education, and community outreach.

If you are looking for a broad foundation supporting people and communities, a human services online degree provides a fast track toward roles involving advocacy, support services, and nonprofit environmental work.

Educators with a science background may wish to pursue a career change for teachers into areas like environmental communication or speech pathology, applying their teaching skills in new, impactful ways.

Those passionate about design and sustainability might consider an architecture online degree, merging ecological principles with the creation of green, resilient spaces.

Each pathway offers unique ways to make a difference in environmental science, using online learning to balance career goals and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Carlo H. R. Heip

Recently Published Articles