World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
18247
World Ranking
8032
National Ranking
4295

Timothy C. Brock publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy C. Brock sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Timothy C. Brock D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy C. Brock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy C. Brock is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. The available data does not include detailed information about their recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues. There is no specific information regarding book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or topics of research associated with their profile.

Although comprehensive details on their academic contributions are limited, Timothy C. Brock's association with a major research institution like The Ohio State University indicates involvement in scholarly activities within their area of expertise.

The lack of listed awards or distinctions suggests that no notable accolades have been documented in the available data. Likewise, there is no record of citations or significant impact metrics provided.

Without explicit references to research themes, co-authorship networks, or publication outlets, a precise outline of their scholarly footprint cannot be furnished. Nonetheless, Timothy C. Brock remains an active scientist based on the current data set indicating they are not deceased.

Best Publications

  • The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.

    Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock

  • Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds

    Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock;Geoff F. Kaufman

  • In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion

    Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock

  • Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort Justification

    Richard E. Petty;Gary L. Wells;Timothy C. Brock

  • Cognitive Responses in Persuasion

    Richard E. Petty;Thomas M. Ostrom;Timothy C. Brock

  • Psychological Foundations of Attitudes.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;Timothy C. Brock;Thomas M. Ostrom

  • 10 – Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change1

    Timothy C. Brock

  • Narrative Impact : Social and Cognitive Foundations

    Melanie C. Green;Jeffrey J. Strange;Timothy C. Brock

  • COMMUNICATOR-RECIPIENT SIMILARITY AND DECISION CHANGE.

    Timothy C. Brock

  • Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback

    Deborah Davis;Timothy C Brock

  • The Nature of Attitudes and Cognitive Responses and Their Relationships to Behavior

    Richard Petty;T. M. Ostrom;T. C. Brock

  • Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production

    Timothy C. Brock

  • Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives

    Sharon Shavitt;Timothy C. Brock

  • Distraction Increases Yielding to Propaganda by Inhibiting Counterarguing.

    Robert A. Osterhouse;Timothy C. Brock

  • The Power of Fiction: Determinants and Boundaries

    Melanie C. Green;Jennifer Garst;Timothy C. Brock

  • Fictional narratives change beliefs: replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration.

    S. Christian Wheeler;Melanie C. Green;Timothy C. Brock

  • Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information.

    Timothy C. Brock;Joe L. Balloun

  • Debriefing and susceptibility to subsequent experimental manipulations.

    Timothy C Brock;Lee Alan Becker

  • Emotions and the Story Worlds of Fiction

    Melanie C. Green;Jeffrey J. Strange;Timothy C. Brock

  • Liberalization of Commodity Theory

    Timothy C. Brock;Laura A. Brannon

  • Effects of Source Characteristics on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion

    Richard Petty;T. M. Ostrom;T. C. Brock

Frequent Co-Authors

Melanie C. Green
Melanie C. Green University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Richard E. Petty
Richard E. Petty The Ohio State University
Sharon Shavitt
Sharon Shavitt University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Daniel Romer
Daniel Romer University of Pennsylvania
S. Christian Wheeler
S. Christian Wheeler Stanford University
Gary L. Wells
Gary L. Wells Iowa State University
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania
Kristina R. Olson
Kristina R. Olson University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree can open doors to a variety of psychology career paths in the USA. Graduates often explore roles such as counselor, clinical psychologist, or psychometrist, depending on their interests and qualifications.

It’s important to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of being a psychologist. While this field can be highly rewarding—helping individuals and communities—some positions may involve emotional challenges or extensive education and licensing requirements.

Career options are diverse. For instance, a psychometrist specializes in administering and analyzing psychological tests. The psychometrist salary varies based on experience, education, and sector, making it a compelling path for those interested in data and assessment.

When considering graduate education, students should understand the difference between PhD and PsyD in psychology. Each offers a unique focus—PhDs often emphasize research, while PsyDs prioritize clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy C. Brock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles