World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4301 3974 2397 2165 120 21024

Constance A. Flanagan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Constance A. Flanagan between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Constance A. Flanagan published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 8 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1971 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Constance A. Flanagan: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 4
1991 1
1992 0
1993 6
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 3
2006 4
2007 9
2008 5
2009 4
2010 16
2011 11
2012 10
2013 6
2014 9
2015 5
2016 4
2017 2
2018 2
2019 6
2020 4
2021 5
2022 4
2023 3
2024 4
2025 4
Total 158
Download as CSV

Constance A. Flanagan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constance A. Flanagan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 120
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Constance A. Flanagan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constance A. Flanagan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Constance A. Flanagan is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans social sciences and environmental science, with a focus on subfields such as management, monitoring, policy and law, education, safety research, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work engages deeply with thematic areas including environmental education and sustainability, youth development and social support, diverse educational innovation studies, service-learning and community engagement, climate change communication and perception, urban green space and health, and indigenous and place-based education.

Flanagan's recent publications demonstrate a consistent engagement with the intersection of youth, civic engagement, and environmental issues. Selected papers include:

  • "Place-based civic science-collective environmental action and solidarity for eco-resilience," 2021, Child and Adolescent Mental Health
  • "Place-Based Environmental Civic Science: Urban Students Using STEM for Public Good," 2021, Frontiers in Education
  • "Urban youth and the environmental commons: rejuvenating civic engagement through civic science," 2021, Journal of Youth Studies
  • "Urban youth preserving the environmental commons: student learning in place-based stewardship education as citizen scientists," 2020, Sustainable Earth Reviews
  • "Civic science: Addressing racial inequalities in environmental and science, technology, engineering, and math education," 2022, Child Development Perspectives

Frequent coauthors in Flanagan's scholarly work include Erin Gallay, Alisa Pykett, Eva Vivian, Miriam Furlan Brighente, and Ethan Lowenstein. This collaboration network reflects a multidisciplinary approach to the study of civic science, youth engagement, and environmental education.

The researcher's frequent publication venues highlight a focus on interdisciplinary journals related to development, education, and mental health. These venues include Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Theory Into Practice, Frontiers in Education, Journal of Youth Studies, and Sustainable Earth Reviews.

Best Publications

  • Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families.

    Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Carol Midgley;Allan Wigfield;Christy Miller Buchanan

  • Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families.

    Unknown

  • Civic Engagement and the Transition to Adulthood

    Constance Flanagan;Peter Levine

  • Self‐Concepts, Domain Values, and Self‐Esteem: Relations and Changes at Early Adolescence

    Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Allan Wigfield;Constance A. Flanagan;Christy Miller

  • Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective.

    Roderick J. Watts;Constance A. Flanagan

  • TIES THAT BIND : CORRELATES OF ADOLESCENTS' CIVIC COMMITMENTS IN SEVEN COUNTRIES

    Constance A. Flanagan;Jennifer M. Bowes;Britta Jonsson;Beno Csapo

  • Dimensions of Citizenship and Opportunities for Youth Development: The What, Why, When, Where, and Who of Citizenship Development

    Lonnie R. Sherrod;Constance Flanagan;James Youniss

  • Youth Civic Development: Implications of Research for Social Policy and Programs

    Constance A. Flanagan;Nakesha Faison

  • Examining Trends in Adolescent Environmental Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Across Three Decades

    Laura Wray-Lake;Constance A. Flanagan;D. Wayne Osgood

  • Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth

    Lonnie R. Sherrod;Judith Torney-Purta;Constance A. Flanagan

  • School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students.

    Constance A. Flanagan;Patricio Cumsille;Sukhdeep Gill;Leslie S. Gallay

  • Youth Political Development: An Introduction

    Constance A. Flanagan;Lonnie R. Sherrod

  • Volunteerism, Leadership, Political Socialization, and Civic Engagement

    Constance A. Flanagan

  • Control versus autonomy during early adolescence.

    Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Christy Miller Buchanan;Constance Flanagan;Andrew Fuligni

  • Teenage Citizens: The Political Theories of the Young

    Constance A. Flanagan

  • Civic Measurement Models: Tapping Adolescents' Civic Engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55.

    Constance A. Flanagan;Amy K. Syvertsen;Michael D. Stout

  • Civic Measurement Models: Tapping Adolescents' Civic Engagement

    Constance A. Flanagan;Amy K. Syvertsen;Michael D. Stout

  • Adolescents' explanations for political issues: concordance with their views of self and society.

    Constance A. Flanagan;Corinna Jenkins Tucker

  • Parents' and teachers' beliefs about adolescents: Effects of sex and experience

    Christy Miller Buchanan;Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Constance Flanagan;Carol Midgley

  • Developmental Roots of Political Engagement

    Constance Flanagan

  • Developmental Patterns of Social Trust Between Early and Late Adolescence: Age and School Climate Effects

    Constance A. Flanagan;Michael Stout

  • Youth activism : an international encyclopedia

    Lonnie R. Sherrod;Constance A. Flanagan;Ron Kassimir;Amy K. Syvertsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine
Judith Torney-Purta
Judith Torney-Purta University of Maryland, College Park
D. Wayne Osgood
D. Wayne Osgood Pennsylvania State University
Carol Midgley
Carol Midgley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Allan Wigfield
Allan Wigfield University of Maryland, College Park
Andrew J. Fuligni
Andrew J. Fuligni University of California, Los Angeles
Brian D. Christens
Brian D. Christens Vanderbilt University
Corinna Jenkins Tucker
Corinna Jenkins Tucker University of New Hampshire
Janis E. Jacobs
Janis E. Jacobs Pennsylvania State University
Robert W. Roeser
Robert W. Roeser Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA offers a wealth of choices, both in terms of study options and career pathways. Online psychology degrees are increasingly popular, giving students flexibility to balance studies with work or other commitments.

Cost is a major factor for many students. Consider looking into affordable psychology programs in Vermont if you’re seeking high-quality education at lower tuition rates. For those interested in thriving metropolitan areas, the popular psychology degrees in Charlotte offer vibrant learning communities and local job opportunities.

In the nation’s capital, popular psychology programs in Washington, D.C. provide access to unique internships and networking possibilities, thanks to proximity to federal agencies and mental health organizations. Meanwhile, the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Delaware are recognized for academic excellence and varied specializations.

Graduates can pursue diverse roles, from counseling and organizational psychology to research and healthcare. By choosing an accredited program, students can build a strong foundation for licensure, advanced studies, or immediate entry into a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Constance A. Flanagan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles