World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
12131
World Ranking
10706
National Ranking
5594

Janis E. Jacobs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janis E. Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 45 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janis E. Jacobs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janis E. Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janis E. Jacobs was affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Over the course of their career, they contributed to the academic community primarily through their research and scholarly activities.

Although specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work were not listed, the affiliation itself places Janis E. Jacobs within a significant research environment known for fostering diverse academic disciplines.

The absence of detailed publication or research data limits the ability to elaborate on particular scientific contributions or areas of specialization. Nevertheless, the connection to Pennsylvania State University suggests engagement with substantial academic networks and resources.

Information regarding awards or recognitions was also not present, which constrains insights into their professional distinctions or honors received.

Janis E. Jacobs is deceased, and thus this profile reflects on the completed trajectory of their academic presence.

Best Publications

  • Changes in Children’s Self-Competence and Values: Gender and Domain Differences across Grades One through Twelve

    Janis E. Jacobs;Stephanie Lanza;D. Wayne Osgood;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Children's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction

    Janis E. Jacobs;Scott G. Paris

  • Gender Role Stereotypes, Expectancy Effects, and Parents' Socialization of Gender Differences

    Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Janis E. Jacobs;Rena D. Harold

  • Social Forces Shape Math Attitudes and Performance.

    Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Janis E. Jacobs

  • The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills.

    Scott G. Paris;Janis E. Jacobs

  • The Impact of Mothers' Gender-Role Stereotypic Beliefs on Mothers' and Children's Ability Perceptions

    Janis E. Jacobs;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Achievement in Math and Science: Do Mothers' Beliefs Matter 12 Years Later?.

    Martha M. Bleeker;Janis E. Jacobs

  • Influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child mathematics attitudes

    Janis E. Jacobs

  • Six Paths to Adulthood: Fast Starters, Parents without Careers, Educated Partners, Educated Singles, Working Singles, and Slow Starters.

    D. Wayne Osgood;Gretchen Ruth;Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Janis E. Jacobs

  • Childhood and Adolescent Sports Participation as Predictors of Participation in Sports and Physical Fitness Activities During Young Adulthood

    Daniel F. Perkins;Janis E. Jacobs;Bonnie L. Barber;Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Parents, task values, and Real-Life achievement-related choices

    Janis E. Jacobs;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Gender-role socialization in the family: A longitudinal approach.

    Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Carol Freedman-Doan;Pam Frome;Janis Jacobs

  • Gender Differences in Math Ability: The Impact of Media Reports on Parents

    Janis E. Jacobs;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • The Development of Judgment and Decision Making During Childhood and Adolescence

    Janis E. Jacobs;Paul A. Klaczynski

  • The use of judgment heuristics to make social and object decisions: a developmental perspective

    Janis E. Jacobs;Maria Potenza

  • “I can, but I don't want to”: The Impact of Parents, Interests, and Activities on Gender Differences in Math

    Janis E. Jacobs;Pamela Davis-Kean;Martha Bleeker;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Girls' and boys' developing interests in math and science: do parents matter?

    Janis E. Jacobs;Martha M. Bleeker

  • The Career Plans of Science-Talented Rural Adolescent Girls

    Janis E. Jacobs;Laura L. Finken;Nancy Lindsley Griffin;Janet D. Wright

  • Twenty‐five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in math and science career choices: What have we learned?

    Janis E. Jacobs

  • The self-system during childhood and adolescence: Development, influences, and implications.

    Janis E. Jacobs;Martha M. Bleeker;Michael J. Constantino

  • The Development of Judgment and Decision Making in Children and Adolescents

    Janis E. Jacobs;Paul A. Klaczynski

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine
Scott G. Paris
Scott G. Paris University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
D. Wayne Osgood
D. Wayne Osgood Pennsylvania State University
Bonnie L. Barber
Bonnie L. Barber Griffith University
Sandra D. Simpkins
Sandra D. Simpkins University of California, Irvine
Allan Wigfield
Allan Wigfield University of Maryland, College Park
James P. Byrnes
James P. Byrnes Temple University
Ross A. Thompson
Ross A. Thompson University of California, Davis
Constance A. Flanagan
Constance A. Flanagan University of Wisconsin–Madison
Pamela E. Davis-Kean
Pamela E. Davis-Kean University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees online opens up a variety of career pathways, including clinical practice, counseling, research, and education. Many graduates aim to become licensed therapists, but the specific requirements can vary from city to city. For example, aspiring professionals can review the licensed therapist requirements in Stockton or check out the different steps involved with the Tampa licensed therapist requirements.

Additionally, it's important to understand regional variations in education, supervised clinical hours, examinations, and application procedures. If you’re interested in practicing in Ohio, learn more about how to become a licensed therapist in Toledo. Similarly, for those considering a career in Arizona, review the Tucson licensed therapist requirements.

Whether you’re pursuing a general psychology degree or a specialized counseling track, understanding local certification rules is essential. Being well-informed helps you map your educational journey with your desired career outcome.

Best Scientists Citing Janis E. Jacobs

Recently Published Articles